similar to: Chromium browser for C6

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Johnny, > > > > Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 > > > > cheers > > > > > > bump > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Johnny,

On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps,

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> wrote:

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:01:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

Johnny, Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 cheers On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >> I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for > number > >> keys. > > > > This is a known issue, I

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark

On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM,

On 21/01/15 21:12, Connie Sieh wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Johnny, >>> >>> Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 >>> >>> cheers >>> >>>

Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > Any new information here? maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort. Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/spot/chromium/ thought ... --

https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an old version of gtk2. If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was planning on using C6 for a long time. Does anyone know of a repo that intends to keep Chromium working

On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Johnny, > > Should we give up hope on this issue? > After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works. > > > On

on updated C6 x86_64 Firefox ESR 45.1.0 is seg faulting on various sites, mainly media sites. Tried uninstalling flash-plugin 11.2.202.616 but problem persists. Work around: installed Seamonkey from epel repo Anyone else experiencing unstable behaviour of FF 45.1 on C6?

> Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 15:24:50 -0700 > From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Richard wrote: >> >> >> > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 14:57:22 -0700 >> > From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> >> > >> > I was able to get h.264 support on

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > does anyone running C6 have h.264 check box on www.youtube.com/html5 ? > > if yes, can you please post the output of My understanding, which may be incorrect, was that the firefox in EL6 wasn't built with gstreamer support, so adding that library isn't sufficient. jh

On 09/11/2015 08:11 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> > wrote: <snip> > > > does anyone running C6 have h.264 check box on www.youtube.com/html5 ? > > if yes, can you please post the output of > > rpm -qa | grep -i 'gst\|libva' Yes I do in seamonkey, the browser I use.

I was able to get h.264 support on www.youtube.com/html5 on fedora 21 by installing gstreamer1-libav but that package does not exist in C6 (or it's popular third party repos) What is the name of the package which adds h.264 to firefox on youtube/html5 in C6?