similar to: Filesystem writes unexpectedly slow (CentOS 6.4)

I had a rather large ext4 partition on an Areca RAID shut down uncleanly while it was writing. When I mount it again, it recommends fsck, which I do, and I get the following error: Failed to optimize directory ... EXT2 directory corrupted This error shows up every time I run fsck.ext4 on this partition. How can I fix this? The file system seems to work ok otherwise, I can mount it and it

I have a recently installed Mellanox VPI interface in my server. This is an InfiniBand interface, which, through the use of adapters, can also do 10GbE over fiber. I have one of the adapter's two ports configured for 10GbE in this way, with a point to point link to a Mac workstation with a Myricom 10GbE card. I've configured this interface on the Linux box (eth2) using

I'm on a Supermicro server, X9DA7 motherboard, Intel C602 chipset, 2x 2.4GHz Intel Xeon E5-2665 8-core CPU, 96GB RAM, and I'm running CentOS 6.4. I just tried to use yum to upgrade the kernel from 2.6.32-358 to 2.6.32-431.29.2. However, I get a kernel panic on boot. The first kernel panic I got included stuff about acpi, so I tried adding noacpi noapic to the kernel boot parameters,

I'm having an occasional problem with a box. It's a Supermicro 16-core Xeon, running CentOS 6.3 with kernel 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64, 96 gigs of RAM, and an Areca 1882ix-24 RAID controller with 24 disks, 23 in RAID6 plus a hot spare. The RAID is divided into 3 partitions, two of 25 TB plus one for the rest. Lately, I've noticed sporadic hangs on writing to the RAID, which

I have an 8-core SuperMicro Xeon server with CentOS 6.3. The OS is installed on a 120 GB SSD connected by SATA, the machine also contains an Areca SAS controller with 24 drives connected. The motherboard is a SuperMicro X9DA7. When I installed the OS, I used the default options, which creates an LVM volume group to contain / and /home, and keeps /boot and /boot/efi outside the volume group.

I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually sets DISPLAY to :0.0, which I know is not a good idea, and I can fix. However, this still doesn't explain why my default X DISPLAY is suddenly :3.0. -- Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducci?n - Terminal joakim at terminalmx.com

I'm trying to work out the kinks of a proprietary, old, and clunky application that runs on CentOS. One of its main problems is that it writes image sequences extremely non-linearly and in several passes, using many CPUs, so the sequences get very fragmented. The obvious solution to this seems to be to use SSDs for its output, and some scripts that will pick up and copy our the sequences

Hello listmates, I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc? Thanks. Boris.

Hi list, Due to possible budget cuts, I am looking at finding alternatives to the Netapp filers we currently have. Obviously, one of the key drivers is the performance required for our specific application. On https://www.fotoloog.org/fs.png you can see the load on our main filer. The key question I have is: looking at that graph, do you think it is worthwhile looking into Samba further as a

Hello: I am looking for a recommendation for a PCI-e RAID card for my server. The server has a PCI-e x16 low profile slot so the card has to be at most 6.6 inches long x 2.536 inches high. I would like to use RAID 5 with 3 drives so I have to have those capabilities. It has to be CentOS 5.4 compatible (Of course!). I took a look at the offerings from 3Ware, but their cards are too long. If

Hi gluster users, I've spent several months trying to get any kind of high performance out of gluster. The current XFS/samba array is used for video editing and 300-400MB/s for at least 4 clients is minimum (currently a single windows client gets at least 700/700 for a single client over samba, peaking to 950 at times using blackmagic speed test). Gluster has been getting me as low as

Is anyone running either the newish Adaptec 5805 or the new LSI (3ware) 9750 sas raid controllers in a production environment with Centos 5.3/5.4? The low price of these cards makes me suspicious, compared to the more expensive pre-merger 3ware cards and considerably more expensive Areca ARC-1680. I've been 'burned' by the low cost of Promise raid cards (just as this group pointed

It is sequential write with file size 2GB. Same behavior observed with 3.11.3 too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. >> 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.

Hi Brandon, Can you please turn OFF client-io-threads as we have seen degradation of performance with io-threads ON on sequential read/writes, random read/writes. Server event threads is 1 and client event threads are 2 by default. Thanks & Regards On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Brandon Bates <brandon at brandonbates.com> wrote: > Hi gluster users, > I've spent several

Hello? We have used glusterfs3.4 with the lasted samba-glusterfs-vfs lib to test samba performance in windows client. two glusterfs server nodes export share with name of "gvol": hardwares: brick use a raid 5 logic disk with 8 * 2T SATA HDDs 10G network connection one linux client mount the "gvol" with cmd: [root at localhost current]# mount.cifs //192.168.100.133/gvol

Why don?t you set LSI to passtrough mode and set one brick per HDD? Regards, Bartosz > Wiadomo?? napisana przez Brandon Bates <brandon at brandonbates.com> w dniu 27.10.2017, o godz. 08:47: > > Hi gluster users, > I've spent several months trying to get any kind of high performance out of gluster. The current XFS/samba array is used for video editing and 300-400MB/s for

Hi. I have asterisk (cvs build from tonight) running fine on a RedHat9 box, with zaptel hardware. On a second RedHat9 box (with no zaptel hardware) I've built the same version, apparently with no errors, but immediately upon invoking asterisk I get: Illegal instruction. running under gdb, it shows that its failing in ast_ulaw_init as shown below: [New Thread 16384 (LWP 1097)] Program

Hi all. We just put a relative large server in operation (for our measures ;-) ), a 4x Dual Core / Intel with 16GB Ram and a 3ware 9550SX SATA-RAID with 4 drives. Operating system for the Dom0 is an up-to-date gentoo linux. Everything runs really fine, there are 4 Domu''s running, 1x gentoo and 2x debian and 1x Windows Server 2003. DomU''s are running blazing fast in normal

Hello everyone, This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage volume would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any recommendations as far as hardware? Thanks. Boris. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:18 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:03 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund >