similar to: Bash still vulnerable

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Bash still vulnerable"

2014 Sep 30
2
Bash package for CentOS5
Hi! I have noticed, that our mirror has this package bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm, but a lot of other mirror still have bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm. Since bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm was issued on 26-Sep-2014 04:28, could this be the product of slower mirror update cycles? Regards, Mitja -- -- Mitja Miheli? ARNES, Tehnolo?ki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia tel: +386
2015 Sep 03
0
CESA-2015:1706 Important CentOS 5 bind Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1706 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1706.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: bba46a116e6b5186632655032db42a9ff77c7b0ef3076e21cb4805d8c1c88a8b bind-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.4.i386.rpm
2015 Dec 16
0
CESA-2015:2658 Important CentOS 5 bind97 Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:2658 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2658.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0dc7e37c9a0bfb8cfbe4ed0f47b8a2a7203c8e0827f1c1c3e58ad2e89acbceda bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.4.i386.rpm
2015 Sep 03
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 127, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2014 Sep 26
4
URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
Good afternoon! After applying the latest bash RPM listed at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020594.html : The fixed RPM (bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm) DOES work just fine on CentOS 5.10. However, it DOES NOT work on CentOS 5.4. That is, bash runs fine, but IS STILL VULNERABLE TO SHELLSHOCK! Scary screenie at: http://i.imgur.com/yR7sBjV.png It looks like
2016 Aug 23
0
CEBA-2016:1658 CentOS 5 cman BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1658 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1658.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 7e60ccf2518f1d21f09b8dd19edb4130d43fe0442b3d0a9446aa78ec16d62763 cman-2.0.115-124.el5_11.4.i386.rpm
2015 Dec 17
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 130, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2014 Nov 25
0
CEEA-2014:1898 CentOS 5 dovecot Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1898 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1898.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 04c48a90c887dc9f7334dbc1b80bda482a5ad3ed7b41b313e374397ca1a93b0a dovecot-1.0.7-9.el5_11.4.i386.rpm x86_64:
2010 Jun 20
6
[Bug 1785] New: configurable timeout for x11 cookies
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1785 Summary: configurable timeout for x11 cookies Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
2014 Nov 25
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 14
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2016 Aug 24
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 138, Issue 8
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2004 Aug 04
6
DCC rule set
I have been given a set of "firewall rules" to open my firewall for DCC to support my spam filtering. (I have done many web searches trying to find info relating to DCC with Shorewall, to no avail. The problem is that I am clueless on how these "rules" translate into the shorewall rule format. Could someone please help me translate these? allow udp local gt 1023 to remote
2008 May 03
3
Fonts cut off (Dawn of War, wine 0.9.45 +)
I'm using wine 0.9.44 to run Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War 1.51 (http://appdb.winehq.org/screenshots.php?iAppId=1918&iVersionId=2576) on Kubuntu 8.04 This works just fine: [Image: http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/6568/screen1hq9.th.jpg ] (full size (http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/6568/screen1hq9.jpg)) However, if I use wine 0.9.45 or any later version, the topmost pixel of the fonts
2015 May 28
0
X-UID in mail header is removed?
Dear Dovecot Mailing List, I have 2 questions regarding dovecot and would very much appreciate if you would kindly give me helps. <Question 1> Is 'X-UID' no longer shown in mail header via pop3? I have checked with the following 3 version of dovecot packages in order to make sure if a message sent by dovecot have 'X-UID' in its mail header, and the result is that only
2006 May 02
2
dnd error message in the log
Is this a problem? What is dnd anyway? Thanks, Jim. May 2 10:44:08 DEBUG[6277] db.c: Unable to find key 'SIP/201' in family 'dnd' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060502/7bf1f8ae/attachment.htm
2003 Apr 17
3
mpg123 hangs on close, but plays fine.
I am running Asterisk CVS-04/16/03-18:57:13, and mpg123-0.59r It all sounds great and it plays at the correct pitch and speed. However at the end of the file it simply does nothing. It does not go on the the next step in the extension.conf nor does it hang up. It just sits there. During play I have two processes running for the mp3 stream: root 6300 6299 8 22:32 ?
2014 Nov 28
2
What's up with Firefox/Thundrebird
On 11/24/14 21:17, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> Has anyone had trouble with Firefox/Thunderbird? >> >> When I log on if I start Thunderbird first then I can't start Firefox. >> Clicking on a link in an email fails to start Firefox. >> >> If I
2014 Nov 28
0
What's up with Firefox/Thundrebird
On 28/11/14 16:42, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 11/24/14 21:17, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hey All, >>> >>> Has anyone had trouble with Firefox/Thunderbird? >>> >>> When I log on if I start Thunderbird first then I can't start Firefox. >>>
2014 Nov 28
3
What's up with Firefox/Thundrebird
On 11/28/14 00:47, Philip Manuel wrote: > > On 28/11/14 16:42, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> On 11/24/14 21:17, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>> Has anyone had trouble with Firefox/Thunderbird? >>>> >>>>
2014 Nov 25
6
What's up with Firefox/Thundrebird
Hey All, Has anyone had trouble with Firefox/Thunderbird? When I log on if I start Thunderbird first then I can't start Firefox. Clicking on a link in an email fails to start Firefox. If I start Firefox before Thunderbird then hyperlinks in emails open a page in the existing Firefox instance. Other users on this same machine are having the same problems. This has been happening for that