similar to: patching bash 2.05b for Shellshock

For those of us still in shell shock, the following was sent several days ago under a misleading subject/thread mixed in with a bunch of other nonsense. (Message-ID: <54291071.7010209 at centos.org>) According to Johnny the second bash patch addressed all of the known issues. I had been waiting for a third patch to come through and missed this important information sent on Monday. On

Hello all, Sorry about going a bit off-topic (the question is not really Linux-related) but here it goes nonetheless: 1) How does one create a webpage with a Greasemonkey script that is installable? 2) Why does it happen that a Firefox installation in a user's account (i.e., the configuration which amongst other things contains Greasemonkey scripts) would all of a sudden lose them? Thanks.

According to the vulnerability test script from shellshocker.net, the latest bash versions on CentOS5 and CentOS6, 3.2-33.el5_11.4 and 4.1.2-15.el6_5.2, resp., are still vulnerable to CVE-2014-6277. In fact, on CentOS6, abrtd will send you a nice report about it. Does anyone know if upstream is working on a fix? [root at host ~]# bash ~/shellshock_test.sh CVE-2014-6271 (original shellshock):

Hello Julius, Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. I installed sg3_utils and ran #scsi-rescan but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. Cheers, Boris. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tnjulius <tnjulius at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Boris, > Just rescan the scsi host. > #scsi-rescan #if you have sg3_utils package > #lsscsi > Or > #echo "- - -"

It should work fine. What esxi version you are using? Eero 4.11.2015 6.27 ip. "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > > > > > > > > was the controller you added the virtual disk to an IDE or scsi > controller? > > > > -- > > public gpg key id: 1362BA1A > > > > _______________________________________________

Good afternoon! After applying the latest bash RPM listed at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020594.html : The fixed RPM (bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm) DOES work just fine on CentOS 5.10. However, it DOES NOT work on CentOS 5.4. That is, bash runs fine, but IS STILL VULNERABLE TO SHELLSHOCK! Scary screenie at: http://i.imgur.com/yR7sBjV.png It looks like

OK, thanks again for all your help. I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets. For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Julius, > > Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. > > I installed sg3_utils and ran > #scsi-rescan > > but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. > Dumb question: did dmesg even bother to notice *something* was attached? > Cheers, > > Boris. >

Lucian, So far here is the best we could find out: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084747 Testing to see if this is the solution; so far it seems to be. Cheers, Boris. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) > > PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. > >

Hello all, If I were looking for a load balancer to run on a Linux - specifically, CentOS - machine - what would you recommend? Thanks. Boris.

Less, You are 100% right. Of course I brought up my eth0 - but, like you said, with no IP. Meanwhile, I brought up eth0.48 with 192.168.48.100. However, until I would bring up eth0 with an IP address (any in the network) I would have no connection. Why? That's what I fail to understand. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On

Hello all, Is there a way to recognize a hot-plugged disk (i.e., to get the system to recognize it and build the appropriate /dev/sd* device for the new device) without a reboot? Thanks. Boris.

Thanks for getting back with the "solution". You might want to give that bugzilla entry a jolt, it's been stagnating since last year. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at

Thank you everyone. OK, the mystery deepens, I guess. The machine does need to support several VLAN's, it is currently on a trunkport (8021q encapsulated), it made it into the ARP table - which I specifically tested for by physically unplugging the table, clearing the ARP table and plugging it back in. The ARP table currently looks like this: hq#show arp Protocol Address Age (min)

On 11/04/2015 10:27 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Julius, >> >> Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. >> >> I installed sg3_utils and ran >> #scsi-rescan >> >> but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. >> > Dumb question:

On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? > Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan. A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but

Hello all, I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns ) running on CentOS 7. So far I have wirtten the djbdns.service and djbdns.socket files. The sockets (TCP and UDP 53) for some reason would not start and I don't know how to debug that; the service does start but only when I start it manually by running systemctl start djbdns So, I am a real noob when it comes to

And additionally here are the detailed port configs on the switch end: hq>show interface Gi1/0/3 switchport Name: Gi1/0/3 Switchport: Enabled Administrative Mode: trunk Operational Mode: trunk Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Negotiation of Trunking: On Access Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Administrative

Hello listmates, I am wondering if there is a set of scripts/utilities for automatically starting and running headless (no X11) VM's using VirtualBox omn a CentOS 6 server. VNC/RDP access to the VM's would be fine. Any help much appreciated. Cheers, Boris.

Hello listmates, I can't find the 32 bit version of Centos 7. Would it be because I am not looking in the right place or does it not exist at all? Thanks. Boris.