similar to: Pjsip and regcontext (for DUNDi)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Pjsip and regcontext (for DUNDi)"

2007 Oct 06
1
DUNDi, regcontext, softphones.. fail.
> I'm having an issue deploying softphones into my DUNDi/regcontext > setup. My current design is that all SIP users get registered into a > sipregistration context in the sip.conf. I then have a dialplan > function that includes that and does the dial: > > include => sipregistration > exten => _XXXX,2,Answer() > exten => _XXXX,3,Wait(1) > exten =>
2007 Oct 05
0
DUNDi, regcontext, softphones.. fail. :(
All, I'm having an issue deploying softphones into my DUNDi/regcontext setup. My current design is that all SIP users get registered into a sipregistration context in the sip.conf. I then have a dialplan function that includes that and does the dial: include => sipregistration exten => _XXXX,2,Answer() exten => _XXXX,3,Wait(1) exten => _XXXX,4,NoOp(sipregistration call - Name:
2006 Dec 05
0
Re: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload, WORKING
OK this was an easy one to fix. All I had to do is RTFM. Note on the wiki: ATTENTION: Make sure you take a look at bug report 7144 Just do what Kevin said, include the regcontext in whatever static context you have the priority 2 extension and don't make a static regcontext in extension.conf. Let sip module do the rest. Works great. Thanks Guys. JR On 12/5/06, JR Richardson
2006 Dec 05
0
RE: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload
> > Let me guess: The context in which you have the 2 thru n priorities is > the same one as you're using for regcontext right? > > Don't do that, bad things will happen (as you've noticed). > > I'd have to review the code again, but I think what you're seeing is as > a result of this. > > Regards, > - Brad > No, not exactly, I have a
2006 Dec 05
0
RE: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > JR Richardson > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:49 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] RE: regcontext,NoOp extension > vanishes when extension reload > > > > > Let me guess: The
2006 Mar 16
0
Regcontext, only 1 context available?
Hi All, I'm working with regcontext and sip users/peers. In the wiki, the example shows you can put this parameter in the [sipuser] context, like so: [general] lots of general parameters [sipuser] regcontext=siptest regexten=1234 Now this does not create the Noop exten priority 1 in the dial plan when the sip user registers. Now if I put regcontext in the [general] section, the sip user
2006 Jun 08
1
Using regcontext
Hello List Ive been trying to use regcontext, but I cant get it to work. Ive setup my sip peers to have the regexten _[0-9]., so that I can capture all registrations in a single extension. But when they register, I can see that the dynamic extension is created, but none of the rest of the code is executed, priority 2-4. Can anyone explain how I should use the regcontext parameter, etc. am I using
2009 Aug 07
1
regcontext regexten
Hi Anyone know how to use regcontext et regexten parameter from sip.conf and can give an example ? thx regards Harry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090807/ef9ba45e/attachment.htm
2005 Oct 08
0
Regcontext/regexten broken??
Recently I've noticed two bits of odd behavior with respect to regcontext/regexten in CVS HEAD & 1.2 Beta1, and I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on this. I've set up a regcontext in sip.conf. I've set up two users with regexten entries, one in sip.conf and one in a mysql realtime table. The first bit of oddness is that regexten seems to work somewhat as described
2006 Jun 08
0
SV: Using regcontext
Hello Thanks for the answer... Just realized it myself, as your mail arrived :) Could be a nice feature though. Jon -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Olle E Johansson Sendt: 8. juni 2006 12:09 Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Emne: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Using
2006 Dec 05
2
regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload and doesn't come back
Hi All, I just noticed something interesting. When a sip device registers and regcontext is setup in sip.conf, a NoOp priority 1 extension is dynamically created in the dialplan within the specified regcontext. Works great. If for some reason, modification is made to the extension.conf and a >reload extension is performed, those dynamically created extensions in the regcontext vanish. Now
2006 Mar 13
0
Re: Regexten & Regcontext, working now
Just figured it out, I think. I put regcontext=mycontext into the [general] section in sip.conf instead of the the [user] section and when the sip user registered, the NoOp extension priority 1 came right up in the dial plan. All is well again, so far. Clarity of sight becomes infinitely greater with head removed from rectum. >> > Hi All, > > I've been trying to get
2006 Mar 13
0
Regexten & Regcontext
Hi All, I've been trying to get regexten and regcontext going for some sip peers but following the examples on the wiki is not working, as far as I can tell, nothing is happening. the phone registers, sip show peers is ok, but the NoOp priority 1 extension never gets created or added to the dialplan. Has anyone got this working? Thanks. JR JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses
2006 Oct 06
3
regexten & regcontext broken for SIP?
Hi ho, is there anyone out here that is making use of the regcontext and regexten settings in sip.conf? I've tried this on two Asterisk boxes (1.2.10 and 1.2.12.1) and in both cases I don't see the Noop priority 1 being created upon SIP client registration, "show dialplan xxx" reveals no change. And yes, I have also read and checked bug 7144; if I go down that route and no
2008 Oct 07
1
regcontext
hi all, just wondering what's happening here: i have a pap2 and an spa941. everytime i call my spa from my pap2 i can see it being added dynamically on the regcontext: [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Saved useragent "Linksys/SPA942-5.2.8" for peer 100100 [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Added extension '100100' priority 1 to sipregcontext but from spa to pap2 i dont see it, i looked
2015 Jun 19
1
Asterisk Tech/Eng Positions Open In Dallas TX
We have a couple of positions open, please contact me off-list if interested. http://www.ntegratedsolutions.com/voice-engineer-dallas/ These are full time positions in Dallas, no telecommuters please. Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses Chasing the Azeotrope
2006 Nov 01
2
Realtime, DUNDi and regexten
It seems that when you use Realtime static and possibly realtime realtime for sip users, that Asterisk fails to create the regexten context for DUNDi. Someone else had the same problem back in July. Doesn't look like they ever had a resolution. <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-July/160105.html>
2006 Jan 16
5
Dundi Examples
Can someone show me how to set up DUNDi, I will be using it to connect 14 asterisk servers internally. I don't want to use it on the external world. If anyone has any examples of connecting 2 or 3 (if their is a difference) machines in a DUNDi co-operation that would be helpful. Johnathan Falk Network Administrator Clinton Community Schools
2006 Mar 16
0
RE: DUNDi .... Halfway and CLUSTERING
Doug, I feel your pain. I have, since 3 days ago, all but giving up on dundi in a enterprise/carrier core scalable environment, mostly due to no ability to summarize dial plan routes across several servers that may or may not have contiguous extensions registered across the cluster. Example server 1 has exten 1234, 1235, 1001, 1002 registered and server 2 has 1236, 1237, 1003, 1004. But also in
2008 Feb 23
1
dundi lookup
Pardon my ignorance but I understand that DUNDi lookups (*CLI> dundi lookup xxx at yyy) reveal if a given extension is "served" by some host, ie. if it's present in its dialplan. It does not say if it's registered or not. Is this correct? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home