similar to: Rejecting spam

I wish to add options to sendmail INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock, F=T, T=C:5m;S:4m;R:4m;E:5m')dnl dnl MAILER(cyrusv2)dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist', `S=local:/var/run/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT', `j, {if_addr}') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_HELO', `{verify},

I have a problem getting spamd and sendmail (both stock CentOS4 rpms) to work together on a couple of smtp relay machines. This is clearly a configuration issue and no doubt revolves around my lack of comprehension of how this is to work. Basically, the setup consists of two frontend public smtp transports that redirect all email through a firewall to an internal imap server for final

Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',

Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources are behaving fine. Instead I'm just seing Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01 postfix/smtpd[107746]: Anonymous TLS connection established from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.25.159]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits) Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01

I've just set up a new mailserver using Centos5.2 (sendmail+clamav-milter+spamass-milter). I'm using the spamass-milter package from rpmforge (spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf). I notice that the default setup is to run it as root. I set up my previous mailserver on Centos4, and I can't remember if I did anything special, but on that machine it runs as user "sa-milt". Is

Fixed, we had smtp_security_level=verify, which I forgot to remove when we removed the relay server we used. Now it should work. Aki On 28.3.2019 13.59, Christian Anthon via dovecot wrote: > Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving > mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources > are behaving fine. > > Instead I'm just

Hi, I have a problem with my postfix/dovecot configuration, I can't receive mail from outside, i can send a mail from my mail to myself and others, but i can only receive one i send from myself, but when it comes from outside my domains, it dosn't work. Thaks for your help ! Here is my conf : ----------------------------------------------------------------- DOVECOT

Does anybody have a good method for disabling SA checks on outbound email under sendmail running the spamass milter? Some of our Vhost accounts are getting flagged as spam on the way out due to being on a dirty ISP network. John Hinton

I'm trying to clarify the various ways in which I could set up Postfix + Dovecot + SpamAssassin under CentOS-7, and I'd welcome any comments on the following remarks. As far as I can see there are 3 standard ways of setting this up: 1. Use amavisd 2. Use dovecot + pigeonhole/sieve 3. Use spamass-milter At present I'm following (2), but am thinking of going over to (1), since

I've everything running fine under CentOS-7, as far as I can tell, except that spam is not being diverted to my spam folder ~/Maildir/.Spam . I'm running postfix + spamass-milter + spamass-milter-postfix + dovecot (+ spamassassin), and spam is being duly marked before ending in my inbox . As far as I can see, the current advice is to leave filtering to dovecot, using the

I am following this tutorial: https://www.linuxbabe.com/redhat/spamassassin-centos-rhel-block-email-spam. I followed the steps in "Move Spam into the Junk Folder". When I send an email from a blacklisted e-mail address, I get a bounce e-mail from my e-mail server. Here is what is in my spamass-milter file: EXTRA_FLAGS="-m -r 8 -R NO_SPAM -i 127.0.0.1 -g sa-milt --

I'm trying to clarify the various ways in which I could set up Postfix + Dovecot + SpamAssassin under CentOS-7, and I'd welcome any comments on the following remarks. As far as I can see there are 3 standard ways of setting this up: 1. Use amavisd 2. Use dovecot + pigeonhole/sieve 3. Use spamass-milter At present I'm following (2), but am thinking of going over to (1), since

On 9/3/07, Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> wrote: > > > Now, I can find some files @ /etc/mail > > > > below are files. > > > > mimedefang-filter > > sa-mimedefang.cf <http://sa-mimedefang.cf> > > sa-mimedefang.cf.example > > > > I first want to block Bcc and limit Cc to about 5 users. I googled a > > lot. But, I am still

Hello all, I finally got spamass-milter and clamav-milter running, but have one error I've not been able to determine what is happening. From the log entry I see this line: SYSERR(sa-milt): hash map "Alias0": unsafe map file /etc/aliases.db: Permission denied: 39 Time(s) any pointers here? The 2nd item is with yum. I attempted to update, and wound up getting a fail on a

HI, > You could set > > syslog_facility = local5 > > and have all the log messages in the messages file. According to the output of command # doveadm log find every type of message goes to the file I was looking at, "/var/spool/maillog". >> So, is it postfix doing the local mail delivery, not dovecot? >> > To answer this question please post relevant

All, Thank you for having this list, and I have a question regarding why postfix is not handing off delivery to Dovecot to virtual users. Here is all I can offer since I am not at my server: *Here is the debug information for my postfix setup:* [code] Mar 13 20:23:55 andromeda postfix/smtpd[15316]: name_mask: ipv4 Mar 13 20:23:55 andromeda postfix/smtpd[15316]: inet_addr_local: configured 2

Hi, I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm currently using * Clam-SMTP and * SpamAssassin to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd directly. But I more and more wonder wether AmaViS is even worth it?! It currently looks to me as if AmaViS is eating LOTS of

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date > on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no >

--On Saturday, September 21, 2019 9:59 PM +1200 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >> I use spamassassin via amavisd-new, with messages going postfix -> >> amavisd -> second postfix (all via SMTP). > > This is a good setup, but you may find that you can eliminate the second > postfix step there and go postfix -> amavisd-new -> dovecot lmtp. Unless

Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no smart host stuff_). I've got Sendmail 8.14 installed on a CentOS 7.3