similar to: Best distro to use samba AD DC

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

Hello Min Wai Chan, ? Can you explain more about,, the DC1 will remove any emptey directory on DC1. tested it here, but that does not occure here. i can create empty directories on DC1, and these are synced to DC2. empty or not. ? ?DC1 will overwrite any users/group change on DC2? if setup correctly, your sysvol rights on DC1 and DC2 are the same.. ? i suggest you to the following. get the

Dear All, I've some question. When I create new users/groups in AD DC. It seem that I still need to add UID and GID in unix attribute. Possible my setup on rfc2370. So I would like to check if there is any other way to do this without configuring UID and GID? Thank you. Regards, Chan Min Wai

Dear All, I'm thinking of implementing Samba CTDB as a Files server which join to DC. Would like to have your advise on which distro get the setup example and the package ready? Also anythings that I should be know... Thank You Regards, Min Wai

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greeting, ~ I've setup my Red Hat 7.3 With samba 2.2.5 to be a PDC. Which at the same time, I'm having the same problem like *problems on windows part <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103675771200004&r=1&w=2>*. Accessing from windows to Linux always not a problem. But I'm having a problem to access it reverse. (from Linux

Dear Louis, I think I found something interesting on the script... https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Let say we removed the "--delete-after" which caused DC2 folder to be removed on the next sync... It seem that the location of the folder are part of the cause. If it is the 3rd or above... on the folder we sync... /AD.DOMAIN.NET/Policies/YourNewfolder

Hi All, I'm conducting a meta-analysis and have taken a data.frame with multiple rows per study (for each effect size) and performed a weighted average of effect size for each study. This results in a reduced # of rows. I am particularly interested in simply reducing the additional variables in the data.frame to the first row of the corresponding id variable. For example:

Dear all, Would need some of your advise. As I was the trying to get postfix sasl working with samba AD. I've try to search online for a few examples some use ldap, kerberos or pam. I'm using winbind on that system and I wonder if we can use winbind with sasl. Or anyone have a more correct on how it should be done. My existing setup was working with ldap before moving to samba4.

Dear R Community, I am attempting to transpose a dataset from rows to columns but am stuck. I have tried using reshape() with little luck, possibly due to the categorical nature of the data. For example: id<-c(1,2,2,3,3,3) author<-c("j","k","k","l","l","l")

2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > Dear Daniel, Klaus > > I've try that before > But because of how samba work on the files. > > The Advise is No > Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... > > > Maybe i'm wrong, but we are talking about the sysvol and the databases are out that folder. Sysvol only have the

Just some notes: For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster filesystem. I have no idea how far this is supported w/ samab (ACLs, ...) Maybe a old tool related to drbd might be worth some testing too: http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/ Klaus ________________________________________ Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [samba-bounces at

Hello, Just to share I've updated the guide to use osync. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Enjoy Regards, Min Wai On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Belle, > > That produce the similar situation. > > Thus I'm trying osync > > And the result are much present according to my test

Dear Louis, Just to check... Would it be possible to have more than 2 DC using Unison to sync? I was trying to make this to the samba wiki. But when reading the list I see Rowland talking about the SID and RID issue Because of built-in group SID is not sync across domain. Which I think samba should have their own way of dealing this or it will just be a mess in a long run. Did we have any

Hai Min Wai Chan, ? I have tested it as shown in your example, and your correct. I?did a few test, but im very buzy atm. Few things i noticed. ? ? I?compaired the rights in linux and these are the same, but when i look at the rights in windows, these are different.. :-/ but wait.. Sync DC1 => DC2 , files and folder rights are ok, in windows and in linux Sync DC2 => DC1, files and

Dear All, I've found a strange behavior on Winbind + getent group If there are AD/winbind group didn't have any unix gid... getent group will only show local group. If all the AD/winbind group have unix gid getent will reply with all the group I have included the AD/winbind group. Did we have any bugs reported on this? Thank You.

Hello all, Just to ask have anyone try osync before? https://github.com/deajan/osync And would you think that this will fix our issue on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Where DC2 files or folder will be removed? Thank You.

What Samba version are you using? I have seen a similar problem triggered by connectivity issues between the DCs. What's the output from samba-tool drs showrepl? Still, I haven't found a solution... On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Just to ask. > Anyone can shard some light on that wrong is that? > > Thank you. > > Min