similar to: Samba 4.1.11 RPM building tools for RHEL 6 available

I've been spending some time backporting Samba 4.0.3 from Fedora 19 to RHEL 6, partly as proof of concept, partly to make it available to others. I've published my work at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ The key RPM building tools are at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba-4.0.3-srpm/ And there are dependencies listed for libtalloc, libtevent,

Good evening: I've been trying to build up Samba on RHEL 8. My work is at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/tree/nkadel-rhel8 I've run into a number of issues. One is that RHEL 8 does not have an uptodate mocka. I've add a git submodule for that. Another is that various python modules are missing: Again, I've added modules for that. Another is that RHEL 8 introduced a very

Thanks for that suggestion, however that piece is a 'work in progress', but not the actual problem I am facing right now. FYI - domain controller piece works flawlessly on the 4.4.180 kernel build based around CentOS6 including many integration tests to Windows DC / replication and the like that I have configured. -----Original Message----- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nkadel at

Hi, I managed to compile 4.10.0 under CentOS 7.6. I did the following: - update the yum package repository cache: sudo yum makecache - install yum-utils: sudo yum install yum-utils - add the IUS package repository: sudo yum install https://centos7.iuscommunity.org/ius-release.rpm - update the yum package repository cache again: sudo yum makecache - install Python 3.6 including PIP: sudo yum

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > You do realize I've been publishing .spec files and build tools for > all of this for a while now, with hooks to build for CentOS 7, 8, and > Fedora 30 with full AD features enabled for a few years now? My source > repo is over at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo . Yes, I am aware of your efforts. Your project is much more

I was never able to build it in a way I feel comfortable on Fedora. I would want to build it using an RPM build process. I think I want an MIT build but I don't know what all I would need to build either way. I thought it was pretty close when I saw an MIT build in Fedora 23 with AD support. I was hoping it would have existed in Fedora Rawhide, but I still haven't seen it yet. Personally I

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:29 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 10:38 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > > Interesting. I'd not tried to bundle an upgraded compatibility > > gnutls. > > I think I understand how you did that, but I'm unclear on why you > > selected the "hobbled" tarballs and where

I would like to start testing this? I saw a few months back Alexander Bokovoy Released a build for F23 and I started using that. Now that F24 is out I have to look for a way to upgrade. Is there a build for rawhide with this? The standard samba-ad package for rawhide that install still doesn't come with samba-tool. And compiling samba 4.4.5 with-mit-krb5 automatically disables ad support it

Hi Nico, that's amazing! Let me digest it because I am not sure if I can perform the installation properly. I will get back to you once done. Thanks very much, Metin Mobile! ________________________________ From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2023 1:03:52 PM To: Metin Koc <metkoc at outlook.com> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at

As we wanted to test last Samba version we had to compile Samba manually once 4.3.0 went out. As we wanted to continue to deploy Samba using system's package manager, we decided to built our own RPM. As I hate RPM, I had to learn. As I'm lazy, I tried to not waste too much time learning RPM. So I downloaded .spec from Sernet's package 4.2.x, I modified that .spec to match new Samba

Hi Nico, Glad to hear you're feeling better. So now we've got several builds of samba-4.10.x for centos7/rhel7: - Your 4.10.2 build (requires python36 from EPEL but is more future-proof) - Sergio's (don't know the details on those). - My modest builds (based on python2.7 and which don't require addons). As much as I agree that doing anything python2 these days in pretty much

On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > > Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported > updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL and > CentOS? > > If you'd like the tools to enable domain controller access. I publish > a set of them, pdated a few days ago to 4.13.0rc2., at > > *

On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 21:38 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > You do realize I've been publishing .spec files and build tools for > > all of this for a while now, with hooks to build for CentOS 7, 8, > > and > > Fedora 30 with full AD features enabled for a few years now? My > > source > >

updating Fedora-rawhide this morning I see 4.5.0rc1 has arrived. And still no samba-tool so I looked at installing from source with dnf download --source samba rpm -i samba*src.rpm looking at the spec file I see a section %if ! %with_dc --without-ad-dc \ %endif How do I tell rpmbuild with_dc? On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:27 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote:

I've been doing some work backporting the Fedora rawshid version of Samba 4.0.3 to work with RHEL 6. The latest updates (with some suggested changes from others) are at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo The full suite for building Samba 4.0.3 on RHEL 6 is there, with all the updated libraries and hooks to put it in a yum repository. In particular, with some help, I've

Hi Nico, That's bad news.. but would there be an interest in opening bugs with the samba team if python2 support is not sufficient for building and running samba 4.10 on rhel7? I thought I read in the release notes that python2 support would stay for the length of 4.10.x but not afterwards. So, IMHO if it doesn't work as expected, perhaps it's time for us to file BZ issues?

On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 19:47 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 10:36 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba wrote: > > > > > > Centos [6,7]* however does not have into current samba 4.x > > > version > > > fully support to AD DC

correction samba-dc still doesn't come with samba-tool On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to start testing this? I saw a few months back Alexander > Bokovoy Released a build for F23 and I started using that. Now that F24 > is out I have to look for a way to upgrade. Is there a build for rawhide > with this?

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 10:36 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba wrote: >> >> Centos [6,7]* however does not have into current samba 4.x version >> fully support to AD DC (without rebuild the source with some few >> changes): There are changes, but they're not outrageous.

Hi Gabriel, I've compiled Samba 4.10.2 on CentOS 7 successfully. I've read the wiki that 4.10.2 version is full compatible with python 3, specifically python 3.4. Then I've install, use the yum command, the package python34-devel and I've added an environment variable at /etc/profile with export PYTHON=python3.4. Thus, I've run ./configure, make and make install with no