similar to: Failure to add computer to domain

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Failure to add computer to domain"

2015 Feb 02
1
Windows users can't change password 4.1.6
Just to be sure: Your real realm does not end with .local, right? In an another thread it was not recommended to use TLD .local. The wiki says this also. Am 2. Februar 2015 12:25:46 MEZ, schrieb "Micha? P??rolniczak" <michal.polrolniczak at warp.org.pl>: >the smb.conf for samba 4.1.6-Ubuntu >[global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL >
2015 Jan 28
1
Windows users can't change password 4.1.6
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Micha? P??rolniczak < michal.polrolniczak at warp.org.pl> wrote: > > > W dniu 2015-01-27 o 18:42, Marc Muehlfeld pisze: > >> Hello Micha?, >> >> Am 27.01.2015 um 07:08 schrieb Micha? P??rolniczak: >> >>> When changing password via Windows Logon it doesn't say it change it, it >>> say that new password
2015 Jan 28
2
Windows users can't change password 4.1.6
W dniu 2015-01-27 o 18:42, Marc Muehlfeld pisze: > Hello Micha?, > > Am 27.01.2015 um 07:08 schrieb Micha? P??rolniczak: >> When changing password via Windows Logon it doesn't say it change it, it >> say that new password that I entered is not valid with password politic >> settings, and wasn't change. > Does it met the requirements? >
2015 Jan 27
3
Windows users can't change password 4.1.6
Hello Marc, W dniu 2015-01-22 o 20:17, Marc Muehlfeld pisze: > Hello Micha?, > > Am 22.01.2015 um 07:13 schrieb Micha? P??rolniczak: >> When GPO tells you to change password after 30days, or you want to >> change it; ... > > At first: You can't define password policies via GPO, because they have > to be interpreted by the domain controller(s) and Samba
2015 Jan 22
2
Windows users can't change password 4.1.6
Hello, When PDC was installed I remember that everybody could change thair passwords after first 24h after password reset via admin console. (I remamber that I was searching for this and even if GPO was min 0 days for changing password you had to wait) Anyway... Now noone is able to change password. When GPO tells you to change password after 30days, or you want to change it; typing old
2015 Feb 02
0
Windows users can't change password 4.1.6
the smb.conf for samba 4.1.6-Ubuntu [global] workgroup = DOMAIN realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL netbios name = ubuntu server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes #log level = 3 [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/domain.local/scripts read only = No [sysvol]
2014 Jul 22
1
tdb_rec_read bad magic
using samba 4.1.4 syslog have alot of those in log: [2014/07/22 13:24:12.22351, 0] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:71(ldb_wrap_debug) ldb: ltdb: tdb(/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=LOCAL.ldb): tdb_rec_read bad magic 0x0 at offset=516897176 Anything I can do to fix it?
2014 Jul 30
1
samba Digest, Vol 139, Issue 40
From: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> To: samba at lists.samba.org Cc: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:03:54 +0100 Subject: Re: [Samba] I getting some erros about SPNs and main process ended, respawning On 30/07/14 14:38, Claudio Renato Cardoso wrote: > Please I getting some erros about SPNs and main process ended respawing, > bellow the erros that ia m getting at messages
2014 Feb 12
1
Internal DNS in 4.1.x having hiccup
We started with 4.1.0, there were few clients and Domain Controler worked fine. We started upgrading at 4.1.2 with: ./configure --enable-debug, make, make install on stoped samba4. We didn't notice any bad things. Curently we are using the 4.1.4, and can't be 100% but we started adding more and more people, but the dns dont respond allways. First it started with not responding anything (we
2014 Jul 23
1
SID transfer to fresh DC
I would like to take users and theirs SIDs to new Samba 4 DC. Because from what I know if I create new domain with same name and IP as one before with same user names and passwords windows machines which use old domain accounts will create new ones accounts because SIDs won't match. Any ideas how can I do that? I understand that 'domain trust' will be broken when new DC with same
2012 Jul 18
1
FETCH Error
Hi, I have the following problem: Jul 18 14:36:09 mailint1 dovecot: imap(micha): Error: FETCH [] for mailbox INBOX.Sent UID 166 got too little data: 120860 vs 120867 Jul 18 14:36:09 mailint1 dovecot: imap(micha): Error: Maildir filename has wrong W value: /var/mail/mailboxes/users/micha/.Sent/cur/1240390202.Rfd9752b8Q14135.mail-alt,S=280003,W=284007:2,S Jul 18 14:36:09 mailint1 dovecot:
2018 Sep 01
17
[PATCH v3 00/13] remove_conflicting_framebuffers() cleanup
This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. This is a sligtly updated version of a series sent on 24 Nov 2017. --- v2: - rebased on current drm-next - dropped staging/sm750fb changes - added kernel docs for DRM helpers v3: - move kerneldoc to fbdev, where functions are implemented - split kerneldoc
2018 Sep 01
17
[PATCH v3 00/13] remove_conflicting_framebuffers() cleanup
This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. This is a sligtly updated version of a series sent on 24 Nov 2017. --- v2: - rebased on current drm-next - dropped staging/sm750fb changes - added kernel docs for DRM helpers v3: - move kerneldoc to fbdev, where functions are implemented - split kerneldoc
2018 Mar 05
2
SAMBA4 Fileserver & Disk Quota
I tried this. When im creating a folder directly on server, the sticky bit is working. But it does not work when im doing it from windows. # ls -l drwxrws---+ 7 root stickygroup 4096 Mär 5 14:44 00_stickygroup/ Best regards Micha Am 05.03.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Michael Wandel: > IMHO you can use the posix sgid bit.
2018 Feb 06
4
GPOs not Working!
Hello, i have a testing environment, 2 DCs Ubuntu 18.04, SAMBA 4.7.4 - MIT Kerberos (clean, not upgraded). I just wan to create/activating a simple GPOs. # Interactive logon: Do not require CTRL + ALT + DEL -> activate # Interactive login: Do not displa last user name -> activate When im activating this Policys (no errors or something like that) nothing happend. I reboot two Domain
2020 Mar 09
4
[home] trash folder
Hi, i have a share called [home]. Designed like described here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders#Creating_the_Home_Folder_for_a_New_User. First i have no problems but i want to enable a trash folder for each user. At this time i have about 8000 home directories. The directorys are subfolders from [home]. Is it possible to enable a trash folder inside the home directory
2010 Jun 17
2
Problem with Chromium
Hello. I have made a ogv file for testing html5 video using ffmpeg2theora for Windows. It is available on http://wwsi.edu.pl/video/enigma.html and http://movies.wwsi.edu.pl/wwsi/small/enigma.ogv . It looks it works fine in Firefox, Opera for Windows, VLC, mplayer, ffmpegplay, some other Linux browsers. It fails in Chrome (and Chromium), the video looks very out of synchronization. I
2018 Jun 28
2
CTDB upgrade to SAMBA 4.8.3
Hi again, First, i revert to a snapashot with samba 4.7.7 and upgraded it to 4.7.8. I got no issue with my settings and "testparm" outputs as expected. Next i tried again upgrade to samba 4.8.3. But i got the same error like an email before. Yes i guess its a problem that "tesparm" cant read the registry. When im removing "include = registry" and add my global
2007 Sep 10
1
BUG - logtail2 failing if bzip2 is used
Hello, logtail 1.2.60. logtail2 has a hardcoded '.gz' suffix during various checks of rotated archive logfiles, but if you use bzip2 for compressing them, it fails, of course. -- Micha? J?czalik, +48.603.64.62.97 INFONAUTIC, +48.33.487.69.04
2018 Feb 12
1
GPO - Computer Policies are not applied
Hi, We just upgraded the Samba-AD from version 4.6.5 to 4.7.5. The upgrade threw many challenges and I will write a separate mail explaining the workaround that we adapted to get over them. One of the main challenges is GPO. While the user policy applies properly, the computer policies are not getting applied, rather they are erratic, On some PCs within the same LAN, it works, while on some,