similar to: Samba4 creating share and setting permissions without windows tools

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:44:16 +0100 Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 08.12.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Oliver Heinz: > > > > > > Am 08.12.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:52:53 +0100 > >> Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >

Am 08.12.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:52:53 +0100 > Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm trying to get Samba 4 AD to work with rfc2307 extensions. >> >> wbinfo -i fails >> >> root at m1:~# wbinfo -i SAMDOM\\demo01 >> >> failed to call wbcGetpwnam:

I'm trying to get Samba 4 AD to work with rfc2307 extensions. wbinfo -i fails root at m1:~# wbinfo -i SAMDOM\\demo01 failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND winbindd.log it here: http://pastebin.com/X0rEaLt2 Pretty much everything else seems to work: root at m1:~# wbinfo --ping-dc checking the NETLOGON for domain[SAMDOM] dc connection to "dc1.samdom.example.com"

Hello, I have two Samba Domains and each trust each other (PDCs run 3.0.22). Also I have a samba member server (3.0.24) that runs winbind. When I use wbinfo I can see the user and groups of both domains. I also can chown/chgrp files with users of the domain the server is member of. But I can`t chown/chgrp with accounts of the trusted domain. chown doesn`t work at all. chgrp works, but then only

I?m facing some troubles with file / directory permissions... I log on the domain as admin user(root), and theres a pub share, on witch everyone needs to have permission to create / modify files, but when I change or create a file, only root can change the file, no one else. And then i need to go to server to chgrp users * -R and chown nobody * -R to allow others users to change the file.

i am using chgrp and chown to change ownership from centos command line of paths for example domain users to use it in chgrp bur it is telling me the error that no such group exist. what i must do to be able to use samba users and groups from command line using chown and chgrp thank you

I have a question regarding how rsync changes ownership when syncing two areas. Currently, I have this situation: I have two areas over a WAN, we are trying to mirror from one site to another. One site is not controlled by us and has different unix groups. When we copy one to the other, we are running rsync on an account that exists at both places (different UIDs though) In one area we have

Hello again Rowland, list! Sorry for the delayed response, and top posting. To recap: I'd like to complete the member server wiki so that ACLs can be set from windows without taking undocumented steps. The three ways I've found to do this are: 1) map root to administrator. (LPH VanBelle's script uses this option.) 2) chmod 0775 then chgrp "<DOMAIN>\Domain Admins"

Hi Davor, If the mapping of administrator to root is not ideal, I do like the idea of having a specific FileShareAdmin group. But, why chown and not simply chgrp? Thanks! Shane Robinson Chief Administrative Officer SimpeQ Care Inc. t. 604.988.3103 ext. 104 c. 604.506.3311 f. 604.988.3105 Please consider the environment before printing this email. -----Original Message----- From:

On 2/17/2016 10:32 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 18:07, Ian wrote: >> Actually, that works for me too. I just issued the command 'chgrp >> "BUILTIN\administrators" CoreLib' and it returned successfully for that >> folder. 'ls -la' shows: >> d---------+ 2 MMIA\domain admins BUILTIN\administrators 5 Dec 8 11:59 >> CoreLib//

thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management using groups the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a

I just noticed that on centso 4.5 I have an executable with the +s (chmod +s myexe) doing a chmod root myexe and chown root myexe does NOT affect the +s setting. However, on centos 5 this is not the case. chmod +s myexe chown root myexe or chgrp root myexe will DROP the +s status. How can I get around this? I want to keep the owner, group, world settings. Thanks, Jerry

Hello, I'm considering LLVM for a project, and I wanted to take a look at its bytecode representation/instruction set. So I decided to try to compile the /bin/ls command as bytecode (no particular reason to use ls) and look at it. So I got GNU coreutils from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.0.tar.gz, built it to make sure it works, then replaced gcc, ld, ar and ranlib with

On 03/09/15 20:48, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 02:51 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 03/09/15 19:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 09/03/2015 02:33 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 03/09/15 19:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/03/2015 02:17 PM, Rowland Penny

On 03/09/15 19:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 02:33 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 03/09/15 19:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 09/03/2015 02:17 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 03/09/15 19:05, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/03/2015 01:59 PM, Sketch wrote:

Dovecot 2.3.3 (dcead646b) openSUSE Leap 15.0 I am getting a weird error message: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/local.conf line 16: ssl_cert: Can't open file /etc/foobar/ssl/certbot.pem: Permission denied I have tried the following: - chmod -R 655 /etc/foobar/ssl (/etc/foobar is 755) - create "ssl_users" group add dovecot to it chown -R dovecot:ssl_users

I've got Samba 2.2.2 and winbind up and running fine between a TurboLinux server and an NT 4.0 PDC. I can "chown" files on the linux box fine using "$chown DOMAIN+username filename" but when i try to change an objects group using "$chgrp DOMAIN+groupname filename" i get errors stating that it is an invalid group name. What's the deal here? None of my group

Hi. I'm following this document: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member - setting up my second Samba server in a test environment. We're planning a medium to large-scale deployment (six sites, 8 domain controllers, 8 NAS boxes, 120 workstations). I've already set up an AD Controller and successfully joined a Windows workstation to it. I got down to

On 2/17/2016 9:43 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 17:27, Ian wrote: >> >> On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >>>> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >>>> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >>>> >>>> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch,

2015-03-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 04/03/15 18:31, Shane Robinson wrote: >> >> Hello again Rowland, list! >> >> Sorry for the delayed response, and top posting. >> >> To recap: >> I'd like to complete the member server wiki so that ACLs can be set from >> windows without taking undocumented