similar to: I getting some erros about SPNs and main process ended, respawning

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "I getting some erros about SPNs and main process ended, respawning"

2014 Jul 30
1
samba Digest, Vol 139, Issue 40
From: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> To: samba at lists.samba.org Cc: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:03:54 +0100 Subject: Re: [Samba] I getting some erros about SPNs and main process ended, respawning On 30/07/14 14:38, Claudio Renato Cardoso wrote: > Please I getting some erros about SPNs and main process ended respawing, > bellow the erros that ia m getting at messages
2025 Jan 21
1
SPNs for a samba server
Hi! I'm not sure I understand how SPNs are registered in the AD domain. I know when a regular samba server is joined to an AD domain, a few SPNs are registered - namely, CIFS/$netbios_name and each for CIFS/$netbios_aliases (where netbios name and netbios aliases are the parameters in smb.conf - yes I know these are obsolete, but in this case they're actually used for non-obsolete task).
2025 Jan 22
2
SPNs for a samba server
21.01.2025 13:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 12:51:26 +0300 > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I'm not sure I understand how SPNs are registered in the AD domain. >> I know when a regular samba server is joined to an AD domain, a few >> SPNs are registered - namely,
2023 Jan 31
1
The link (or more particularity the lack of a link) between AD SPNs and DNS
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 10:13 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > 31.01.2023 08:55, Matt Savin via samba ?????: > > In group policies use DNS aliases, then you'll need to change only > > DNS > > entries for these aliases to point to a new host(s). > > I'd say don't use simple dns aliases (cnames) in a DC, but use SPNs > instead > (see samba-tool
2020 Jul 22
4
Failed to modify SPNs
Hi all my samba version is 4.12.5 and when a sql server windows machine join the domain, It shows error in samba : Failed to modify SPNs on CN=SEC-CON03,CN=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com: acl: spn validation failed for spn[E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2-ADAM/SEC-CON03:389] uac[0x1000] account[SEC-CON03$] hostname[SEC-Con03.domain.com] nbname[DOMAIN] ntds[(null)] forest[domain.com]
2025 Jan 21
1
SPNs for a samba server
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 12:51:26 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > I'm not sure I understand how SPNs are registered in the AD domain. > I know when a regular samba server is joined to an AD domain, a few > SPNs are registered - namely, CIFS/$netbios_name and each for > CIFS/$netbios_aliases (where netbios name and netbios aliases
2025 Jan 22
1
SPNs for a samba server
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:32:19 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > 21.01.2025 13:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 12:51:26 +0300 > > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> I'm not sure I understand how SPNs are registered in the AD
2016 Feb 02
2
Failed to modify SPNs on error in module acl: Constraint violation during LDB_MODIFY (19)
Hi, sometimes I see following in the logs: /source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/writespn.c:234(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsWriteAccountSpn) Failed to modify SPNs on CN=PCNAME,CN=Computers,DC=DOMAIN,DC=NAME,DC=NAME,DC=de: error in module acl: Constraint violation during LDB_MODIFY (19) In the net i found this "explanation": "LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION Indicates that the attribute value specified in
2020 Jul 22
1
Failed to modify SPNs
Adam, you already tried my suggestions? What do you see here: > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=SEC-CON03,CN=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com: > acl: spn validation failed for ... ^^^^^^ So read the links below and post your results The event id you showed, for now can be ignored. Inrelevant (for now). And mostlikly wil disapear when you added/fixed the "correct" spn's On
2018 Aug 07
2
Failed to modify SPNs
Hello, I've got some log entries like these on our DCs: Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] At first I thought it was about missing SPN entries, but adding these did not resolve the problem: # samba-tool
2016 Mar 24
2
Failed to modify SPNs on error in module acl: Constraint violation during LDB_MODIFY (19)
Hi again, Am Montag, 14. März 2016, 00:44:47 CET schrieb Markus Dellermann: > Am Donnerstag, 10. März 2016, 10:41:34 CET schrieb mathias dufresne: > Hi, Mathias and all > thank you for your answer. > > > Hi all, > > > > SPN = servicePrincipalName > > > > A simple search returning all servicePrincipalName declared in your AD: > > ldbsearch -H $sam
2009 Feb 10
1
INIT: Id "snmp" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
Hello all, I recently started seeing these messages on the consoles of three production Centos 5.2 servers. They have been occurring nonstop for the past few days and show up routinely every five minutes. INIT: Id "snmp" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: Id "snmp" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: Id "snmp" respawning too fast:
2007 Jul 17
2
INIT: Id "x0" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
Hello, I''m running a SLES10 SP1 Server as a Dom0 and as DomU. I have allocated 1024 Mb RAM to the DomU and one virtual processor (physical processor is a dual core Intel Xeon 3.4 Ghz). A warning is regularly displayed on the standard output : INIT: Id "x0" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes Any idea where that come from ? Thanks in advance. Hervé Marcy
2023 May 11
2
Different spns for primary and secondary DCs
Hi, I have 2 domain controllers with samba4, and i realized i have some missing spns for the second domain controller: > samba-tool spn list dc1$ dc1$ User CN=dc1,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=test,DC=pt has the following servicePrincipalName: ?? ? HOST/dc1.test.pt ?? ? HOST/dc1.test.pt/test[1] ?? ? ldap/dc1.test.pt/test[1] ?? ? GC/dc1.test.pt/test.pt[2] ?? ?
2016 Jan 29
2
respawning dead tinc process
I have tinc 1.1pre11 running on various routers and linux cloud servers. On one of the cloud servers, under Ubuntu 12.04, tinc is mysteriously dying once in a while, leaving a dangling PID. I have been unable to track down why it is dying, but it happens infrequently enough that I care less about why it is dying than how to robustly respawn it when it dies. Before I re-invent the wheel, has
2016 Mar 10
2
Failed to modify SPNs on error in module acl: Constraint violation during LDB_MODIFY (19)
Hi all, SPN = servicePrincipalName A simple search returning all servicePrincipalName declared in your AD: ldbsearch -H $sam serviceprincipalname=* serviceprincipalname An extract from result concerning a lambda client: # record 41 dn: CN=win-client345,OU=Machines,DC=ad,DC=domain,DC=tld servicePrincipalName: HOST/MB38W746-0009 servicePrincipalName: HOST/MB38W746-0009.ad.domain.tld
2010 May 15
1
what''s wrong with my pv domU console? INIT: Id "1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
Hi Pasi, if I don''t change the tty to hvc it will stopped on Kernel 2.6.31.13 on i686 (console) localhost login: root Kernel 2.6.31.13 on i686 (console) localhost login: root Kernel 2.6.31.13 on i686 (console) localhost login: root After I change it to hvc0 followed the twiki page the log is Remounting root filesystem in read-write mode: [ OK ] Mounting local filesystems: [ OK
2018 Aug 07
2
Failed to modify SPNs
Hi Rowland, On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:46:24 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] > > account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] > > forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] > > > > At
2016 Jan 29
2
respawning dead tinc process
I?ve been having the same issue with Ubuntu, thankfully we have access to Upstart: ``` start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up IFACE!=lo) stop on stopping network-services author "Mark Lopez" description "Tinc Upstart Job" version "0.1" env network=master respawn exec /usr/sbin/tincd -n "$network" -D --debug=3 --logfile ``` I removed the default
2014 Dec 17
2
Samba4 DC, SPNs and a complex Windows stack
Hello, We're using Samba 4.1.11 as domain controllers and over the past two weeks I've run into several issues with unrelated Windows software, the problems of which all point to Kerberos authentication and SPNs as being somehow involved. If there are many more issues it might start to get politically difficult *not* to blame the DCs, and I don't want to point fingers at Samba. Are