similar to: Fwd: dnsdomainzone replication failure

-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: Fwd: dnsdomainzone replication failure Datum: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:32:56 +0200 Von: C.Kindler <kindc1 at gmail.com> An: Achim Gottinger <achim at ag-web.biz> Many thanks! I didnt thought about Microsoft Admin Tools :-) - Yes with this is much easier: Now the replication goes a little forward: in the logs there are now such

I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and samba-4.3.6. But if I provision domain by command samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes I got error: Fixing provision GUIDs ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - pytalloc_reference_ex() called for

On 12/03/16 14:20, Andrey Cherepanov wrote: > I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and > samba-4.3.6. > But if I provision domain by command > > samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test > --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc > --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes > > I got error: >

On 17:21:44 wrote Andrey Cherepanov: > I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and > samba-4.3.6. > But if I provision domain by command > > samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test > --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc > --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes > > I got error: > Fixing

On Tue, 15 May 2018 08:07:27 +0200 Stefan Kania <stefan at kania-online.de> wrote: > Good morning, > > today we started allover with a new machine, we got the same errors > but now we have an errormessage when doing a "samba-tool dbcheck" > --------------- > root at addc:~# samba-tool dbcheck > Checking 664 objects > ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception -

On 03/07/2019 15:50, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > It's amazing how long Samba just keeps running even when apparently > everything's broken. > > In preparation of finally upgrading our DCs to 41.0, I ran dbcheck on > all of them, resulting in: > > graz-dc-sem: >> Checking 3861 objects >> Error: governsID

It's amazing how long Samba just keeps running even when apparently everything's broken. In preparation of finally upgrading our DCs to 41.0, I ran dbcheck on all of them, resulting in: graz-dc-sem: > Checking 3861 objects > Error: governsID CN=ucsUser,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=tao,DC=at on 1.3.6.1.4.1.19414.3.2.2 already exists as an attributeId or governsId > Error:

Dear All, Can help to advise if there are any name planing for dns? e.g: I've a domain amtb-m.org should my samba4 server be ad.amtb-m.org? OR should I create another non-reachable internal domain e.g: ad.amtb-m.lan For them? What is the benefit on this or that? Any documentation about that? Thank you.

Hi Rowland, after we solved the puzzle today here is what we found: The Samba PDC with tdbsam backend was installed a loooooong time ago. Many updates and distributions later, the Samba PDC was still running with with the same databases and the same smb.conf. The only thing that someone sometime changed was the hostname and the NetBIOS-Name in smb.conf. BUT in secrets.tdb was still the old name.

Hello, after migrating a samba NT-style domain from Samba 4.2.14-debian (debian 8.10) to samba 4.5.12-debian (debian 9.4) We copied all tdb-files to the new machine plus the smb.conf plus /etc/group. The old Samba has tdbsam as backend. we use the same domain and hostname on the new DC as it was set on the old system. We are using bind9 as DNS-backend in the new system. The "samba-tool

> I think the 10.0.06 entry was created during domain creation. I'd skim > thru dns records from an windows machine if possible and delete all > occurences of unwanted ip adresses. I assume the gpo's still can not be > loaded during logon on the client? Did you inspect gpresult /h result.html? I did remove the record for 10.0.0.6 now. Currently I only have 10.0.1.6 in the DNS

Am 09.08.2016 um 22:18 schrieb Achim Gottinger via samba: > > > Am 09.08.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Rainer Meier via samba: >>> I think the 10.0.06 entry was created during domain creation. I'd skim >>> thru dns records from an windows machine if possible and delete all >>> occurences of unwanted ip adresses. I assume the gpo's still can not be >>>

I have 2 asterisk boxes: asterisk-alpha (running 1.0.3) and dev-asterisk (running latest CVS). I am the only SIP user on dev, everyone else in the office is on alpha. If someone dials my extension, it should go IAX to the dev server and the dev server should ring me. Here is what I see on the dev machine's console: -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 192.168.1.25, requested format = 256,

Am 09.08.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Rainer Meier via samba: >> I think the 10.0.06 entry was created during domain creation. I'd skim >> thru dns records from an windows machine if possible and delete all >> occurences of unwanted ip adresses. I assume the gpo's still can not be >> loaded during logon on the client? Did you inspect gpresult /h >> result.html? >

> You may find other left over records in > DnsDomainZones/ForestDnsZones/GC.msdcs. On my test system where i create > eth0:0 interfaces with different ip's on a regular basis i found alot of > leftovers (seems they do not cause problems here). I couldn't actually spot something strange. I also watched the query log during gpupdate and didn't find anything special there.

I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel 2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3 complains with EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80). I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made filesystem, and it completed with

I'm new to linux so be patient. I'm running Ubuntu Hardy and have Wine 1.1.5 installed. After installing Family Tree Maker 2009 successfully, it will not execute. The screen comes up like it is going to start and says the database needs to be compacted and then the screen fades away. I decided to run FTM 2009 from the terminal and see what is happening. Obviously a lot of things.

Kirtland Air Force Base has denied approval for the use of R on its Windows network. Some of their objections seem a bit strange, but some appear to be legitimate. In particular, they have detected registry "vulnerabilities" which are detailed in the attachment. I know nothing about Windows registry vulnerabilities. If any of these issues are legitimate concerns,