similar to: scripting user adds/deletes

On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:33:02 +1200 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 09:21 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:38:06 +1200 > > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 18:29 -0700, David Bear via samba wrote: > > >

On Wed, 30 May 2018 10:33:55 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > So, in AD LDAP lingo, a 'modify' is not atomic, and a 'delete/add' > > > yes? > > Ahem, i meant: > > So, in AD LDAP lingo, a 'replace' is not atomic, and a

Mandi! Kacper Wirski via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I understand the OP, I was asking some time ago similar question, but it was > in relation to samba domain member. Thanks, Kacper. > I couldn't get backend: ad to work for > machine accounts, so i switched to idmap: rid and it solved everything. I > tried manually adding UID and GID to Domain Computer group and to

I am looking for the python-samba module. I would like to add/disable/modify AD accounts using python running on a linux machine. ChatGPT suggested the python-samba module. Sample code as follows: from samba.credentials import Credentials from samba.netcmd.user import create as create_user from samba.netcmd.user import setpassword as set_user_password ... I am running Debuan bullseye and I can

Hi, I am stuck on upgrading the current Samba3 to Samba4, currently used Samba 3.3.10 and upgraded to Samba 3.4.17 still the same problems below. I also try to upgrade the Python 2.4.3 to Python 2.7 still same problems, with the OpenLDAP 2.3.43. [root at ewanko]# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/var/lib/samba/ --use-xattrs=yes --realm=ewanko.local

Hi Harry Thanks for the comments. All contents under /etc/samba/private were indeed copied over appprd#ls -l /etc/samba/private/ total 432 -rw------- 1 root root 180224 Mar 7 21:29 passdb.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 696 Mar 8 09:13 schannel_store.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 16384 Mar 7 20:29 secrets.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 14449 Mar 8 11:09

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 13:38:56 -0400 Mark Foley wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:08:53 +0200 Michael Wandel <m.wandel at t-online.de> wrote: > > > > Am 26.03.2018 um 06:31 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > > > As a normal user, I want to change my Domain Password. I've tried: > > > > > > $ samba-tool user setpassword myuserId

I''m trying to do the same thing and running into two minor problems.. I would like to rename the puppet command to something like puppet3. We''re running two versions for two separate teams for 2.7 and 3.x However, when I try to do a symlink I get the following error. Error: Unknown Puppet subcommand ''puppet3'' See ''puppet

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 22:41:15 +0200 Harry Jede via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 27. März 2018, 14:25:47 CEST schrieb Rodrigo Abrantes > Antunes via samba: > > I forgot to mention, I'm using samba 3. > OK. Quiet old thingy :-( > > you should read realy old docs: > https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/old/Samba3-HOWTO/ >

Hello, We''re trying to come up with a nice way to indicate when a Puppet module like cloud provisioner breaks a Puppet subcommand because of missing dependencies. When this happens in the current 3.0rc branch, all help for all subcommands is unavailable. This isn''t very helpful. We''re planning to simply mark the subcommands that have incomplete actions as

Currently llvm-objcopy only supports ELF files, and most of it's command line flags are ELF / DWARF specific that don't make any sense on COFF files. So a useful set of options for COFF would be largely disjoint, with maybe 1-2 overlapping options. What would be the best way to add this in llvm-objcopy? I can think of 3 options: 1) Re-write the existing CLI of llvm-objcopy to use

I need LDAP for other uses, how could I have samba4 and ldap without having 2 bases? Citando Harry Jede via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > Am Dienstag, 27. März 2018, 21:58:22 CEST schrieb Rowland Penny: >> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 22:41:15 +0200 >> >> Harry Jede via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 27. März 2018, 14:25:47 CEST

Dear Samba Users, I have a Samba 3.2.5 Server running on Debian. I use tdbsam as a password database and wonder how I can change the "Workstations" value in order to control the allowed workstations for a particular user. Last year I had a configuration with ldap using the smbldap tools where it was possible to set this value. But how can I set it without LDAP just using pdbedit?

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:56 AM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Zach! > > I've been thinking a bit about this for a while now and I'm still of two > opinions: > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:21 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Currently llvm-objcopy only supports ELF

On 06/06/2023 10:02, luckydog xf via samba wrote: > I am quite confident about the command I was typing. :) And I copied from > yours and tried it again. > > == > [root at dc ~]# samba-tool domain provision > samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision > > Usage: samba-tool domain <subcommand> > > Domain management. > > > Options: > -h,

The upgrade shouldn't have touched the Samba database, just the binaries etc, so check the smb.conf file and recreate it if you cannot find it, or if it is incorrect. The smb.conf still exists [global] workgroup = IUMNET realm = IUMNET.EDU.NA netbios name = IUMDCDP01 server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 172.16.10.254

Hi all, I've written a patch <http://reviews.llvm.org/D21485> to support subcommands in llvm command line tools. This potentially has broad interest (either positive or negative), so I figured I'd give a heads up here instead of just on llvm-commits. The motivation for this is that we frequently have tools with incompatible sets of command line options. I ran into this on

Not sure I follow how this would work. "llvm" is an executable, and "opt" is a symlink to "llvm"? How does llvm then detect that it needs to use the opt set of commands? That said, in principle sure you could have "llvm opt <opt-specific command syntax>" or "llvm llc <llc options>". At some point you'd probably need to extend

Hi Rowland The samba-tool command is not working please see the error below: root at iumdcdp01:/home/administrator# samba-tool ERROR(<type 'exceptions.ValueError'>): uncaught exception - bad marshal data (unknown type code) File "/usr/bin/samba-tool", line 46, in <module> retval = cmd._run("samba-tool", subcommand, *args) File

I am quite confident about the command I was typing. :) And I copied from yours and tried it again. == [root at dc ~]# samba-tool domain provision samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Usage: samba-tool domain <subcommand> Domain management. Options: -h, --help show this help message and exit Available subcommands: info - Print basic info about a domain and the DC