similar to: demote DC

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "demote DC"

2014 Jul 24
2
Failed to bind to uuid (GUID)._msdcs.DOMAIN NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS & IRPC callback failed for DsReplicaSync - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
Hello everyone. After all the problems I had demoting my DC and managed it to work again, it was working for only a week. Now i am getting this messages on the log: [2014/07/22 16:13:11.745783, 0] .../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 at
2014 Jul 19
0
Fwd: Re: demote DC
Hi Marc, Thanks for your reply. On 18/07/2014 21:19, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Fernando, > > Am 18.07.2014 20:14, schrieb Fernando Rodriguez: >> I am having a problem while demoting a DC. >> >> The DC i want to demotes is still online. When i try to use the command >> samba-tool domain demote this is the message i get: >> >> root at
2018 May 31
4
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hai Gaetan,   Can you post the output this this command : netstat -plaunt | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd" and iptables -S     @Rowland, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage  might need a smal change.  test as followed The wiki line:  netstat -tulpn | egrep "samba|smbd|nmbd|winbind"  Now test my line and see the changes. this catches everything a DC
2017 Mar 27
3
[Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ?
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 10:43 +0200, Gaetan SLONGO via samba wrote: > Zarafa is not on the same server as Samba  > > We only have 2 AD/DC Samba 4.5 (CentOS 7) and we put required indexes > on LDAP .  > > Arround 1000 mailboxes but not all are simultaneously in use (approx > 1/3 in use).  > MTA is postfix (and is still connected to Samba AD, this one is not > causing the
2010 Jun 17
2
Plotting confidence intervals of two response on same graph (panel).
Hello! I would like to draw a graph like the following: http://www.optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/cml/opt307/spr04/pavel/plot_small.jpg Aim is to plot confidence intervals of treatments for X(=response1) and Y(=response2) axis simultaneously to visualize aggreement of confidence interval for two responses. Can anyone please provide me some direction to start with? Thanks! -- Kim.
2017 Mar 27
4
[Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ?
Can you tell more about your setup? Is zarafa and samba on the same server for example. Which MTA are you using postfix/exim?   My top was about 150 users, and all my printers are connected also so about 200 devices do ldap searches. but my setup is split over 10+ servers ( 2 are AD DC )   So best is to tell what you can about your setup, anonimize if needed.   Greetz,   Louis  
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:28:23 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > > I have no homes share. As far as I know I should not have that share > on a DC ..? Then don't worry about it, I was just checking if you had one. > > > Regarding the security consideration for a DMZ zone, what do you > suggest instead of putting
2018 Jun 13
3
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:40:28 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > Hi Louis, Hi Rowland, > > > I will respond to both in this mail. > > > Yes winbind is installed : > > > > [root at dmzrodc ~]# which winbindd > /usr/sbin/winbindd > [root at dmzrodc ~]# rpm -qa |grep winbind >
2018 May 29
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hi Rowland, As said into the reply sent to Andrew, Winbind is installed, but not started by samba (this is sernet packages) Thanks ----- Mail original ----- De: "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> À: samba at lists.samba.org Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Mai 2018 20:48:22 Objet : Re: [Samba] Samba 4.8 RODC not working On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:30:40 +0200 (CEST)
2017 Aug 29
2
Shares not accessible when using FQDN
Hi, "CLUSTER" is because this server is related to a computing cluster, and is the master node of that cluster ;) No relation with Samba infrastructure, this is just a DNS/Netbios alias. To be honnest the reason why this server is also a DC is to solve a big issue appeared when migrating from 3 to 4. We had no other choice because of a couple of reasons, however it is planed to
2018 Jun 14
1
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:23:56 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > Hi Rowaland, > > > I read the doc. > The reason is the usual one. We need authentication inside the DMZ > zone and do not want any modification from this zone. We also need a > fileserver into this zone where corporate users can log-in. We are > asked to keep the solution
2017 Aug 30
2
Shares not accessible when using FQDN
Hi Rowland My test SMB have several test lines and is dirty, for sure not correct :-) Could you share your setup to achieve this ? Thank you ! ----- Mail original ----- De: "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> À: samba at lists.samba.org Envoyé: Mercredi 30 Août 2017 11:56:46 Objet : Re: [Samba] Shares not accessible when using FQDN On Wed, 30 Aug 2017
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the current process list. We can see missing winbind and *mbd > processes : > > > > [root at dmzrodc ~]# netstat -plaunt | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd" I wouldn't worry about 'winbind' not being in the output of the above
2018 Jun 13
1
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hai, i did see something else you might want to check. I suspect a possible wrong character in smb.conf. The line : server role = active directory domain controller It the only line with "server" in it, i've just checked the smb.conf you posted. Try this, run # backup cp /etc/samba/smb.conf{,-TEST) # This will remove all special characters except the keyboard characters perl
2017 Aug 30
2
Shares not accessible when using FQDN
Hi Rowland, The reason is long to explain but shortly it was about huge amount of data ~20TB stored on that server with unix user ID (comming from a S3/LDAP setup). On a DC mode it seems unix ID are in use instead of idmap id. CNAME is in added indeed. Regarding the migration as said we came from S3/LDAP and go to 4.6. The entire future structure is not fixed yet but at this time we have a
2018 May 29
4
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
I think you missed these in the firewall, if you allowed the "in" for the DC, you also need the OUT. 49152:65535/tcp ALLOW OUT Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Gaetan SLONGO via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 29 mei 2018 16:40 > Aan: Rowland Penny > CC: samba at lists.samba.org
2011 Mar 07
2
connection speeds between nodes
Hi All, I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the setup i had in mind is as following: All the data is already stored on a StorNext SAN filesystem (quantum ) this should be mounted on a centos server trough fiber optics , which in its turn shares the FS over NFS to all the rendernodes
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hi, Not sure sernet can help. It really looks like a samba issue to me..? Just found this in logs when starting the RODC : [2018/06/13 10:59:11.546077, 3, pid=12673, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:291(samba_runcmd_io_handler) samba_runcmd_io_handler: Child /usr/sbin/winbindd exited 1 [2018/06/13 10:59:11.546131, 0, pid=12673, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
2018 Jun 13
4
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:05:23 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > > Same, as said; winbind isn't started :-) > > > > [root at dmzrodc ~]# ps ax | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd" > 650 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -u ntp:ntp -g > 1205 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba -D > 1225 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:33:48 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > > > > > Here it is. It talks about homes share but I think we don't care ? > Final error is not explicit to me.. Maybe you? > > > > INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 10 > tdb: 10 > printdrivers: 10 > lanman: 10 > smb: 10 > rpc_parse: