Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "demote DC"
2014 Jul 24
2
Failed to bind to uuid (GUID)._msdcs.DOMAIN NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS & IRPC callback failed for DsReplicaSync - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
Hello everyone.
After all the problems I had demoting my DC and managed it to work
again, it was working for only a week.
Now i am getting this messages on the log:
[2014/07/22 16:13:11.745783, 0]
.../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv)
Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for
e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 at
2014 Jul 19
0
Fwd: Re: demote DC
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your reply.
On 18/07/2014 21:19, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Hello Fernando,
>
> Am 18.07.2014 20:14, schrieb Fernando Rodriguez:
>> I am having a problem while demoting a DC.
>>
>> The DC i want to demotes is still online. When i try to use the command
>> samba-tool domain demote this is the message i get:
>>
>> root at
2018 May 31
4
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hai Gaetan,
Can you post the output this this command : netstat -plaunt | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd"
and iptables -S
@Rowland, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage
might need a smal change. test as followed
The wiki line: netstat -tulpn | egrep "samba|smbd|nmbd|winbind"
Now test my line and see the changes. this catches everything a DC
2017 Mar 27
3
[Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ?
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 10:43 +0200, Gaetan SLONGO via samba wrote:
> Zarafa is not on the same server as Samba
>
> We only have 2 AD/DC Samba 4.5 (CentOS 7) and we put required indexes
> on LDAP .
>
> Arround 1000 mailboxes but not all are simultaneously in use (approx
> 1/3 in use).
> MTA is postfix (and is still connected to Samba AD, this one is not
> causing the
2010 Jun 17
2
Plotting confidence intervals of two response on same graph (panel).
Hello!
I would like to draw a graph like the following:
http://www.optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/cml/opt307/spr04/pavel/plot_small.jpg
Aim is to plot confidence intervals of treatments for X(=response1) and
Y(=response2) axis simultaneously to visualize aggreement of confidence
interval for two responses.
Can anyone please provide me some direction to start with?
Thanks!
--
Kim.
2017 Mar 27
4
[Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ?
Can you tell more about your setup?
Is zarafa and samba on the same server for example.
Which MTA are you using postfix/exim?
My top was about 150 users, and all my printers are connected also so about 200 devices do ldap searches.
but my setup is split over 10+ servers ( 2 are AD DC )
So best is to tell what you can about your setup, anonimize if needed.
Greetz,
Louis
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
>
> I have no homes share. As far as I know I should not have that share
> on a DC ..?
Then don't worry about it, I was just checking if you had one.
>
>
> Regarding the security consideration for a DMZ zone, what do you
> suggest instead of putting
2018 Jun 13
3
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:40:28 +0200 (CEST)
Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote:
> Hi Louis, Hi Rowland,
>
>
> I will respond to both in this mail.
>
>
> Yes winbind is installed :
>
>
>
> [root at dmzrodc ~]# which winbindd
> /usr/sbin/winbindd
> [root at dmzrodc ~]# rpm -qa |grep winbind
>
2018 May 29
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hi Rowland,
As said into the reply sent to Andrew, Winbind is installed, but not started by samba (this is sernet packages)
Thanks
----- Mail original -----
De: "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
À: samba at lists.samba.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Mai 2018 20:48:22
Objet : Re: [Samba] Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:30:40 +0200 (CEST)
2017 Aug 29
2
Shares not accessible when using FQDN
Hi,
"CLUSTER" is because this server is related to a computing cluster, and is the master node of that cluster ;) No relation with Samba infrastructure, this is just a DNS/Netbios alias.
To be honnest the reason why this server is also a DC is to solve a big issue appeared when migrating from 3 to 4. We had no other choice because of a couple of reasons, however it is planed to
2018 Jun 14
1
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:23:56 +0200 (CEST)
Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote:
> Hi Rowaland,
>
>
> I read the doc.
> The reason is the usual one. We need authentication inside the DMZ
> zone and do not want any modification from this zone. We also need a
> fileserver into this zone where corporate users can log-in. We are
> asked to keep the solution
2017 Aug 30
2
Shares not accessible when using FQDN
Hi Rowland My test SMB have several test lines and is dirty, for sure not correct :-)
Could you share your setup to achieve this ?
Thank you !
----- Mail original -----
De: "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
À: samba at lists.samba.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 30 Août 2017 11:56:46
Objet : Re: [Samba] Shares not accessible when using FQDN
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:46:03 +0200 (CEST)
Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the current process list. We can see missing winbind and *mbd
> processes :
>
>
>
> [root at dmzrodc ~]# netstat -plaunt | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd"
I wouldn't worry about 'winbind' not being in the output of the above
2018 Jun 13
1
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hai, i did see something else you might want to check.
I suspect a possible wrong character in smb.conf.
The line : server role = active directory domain controller
It the only line with "server" in it, i've just checked the smb.conf you posted.
Try this, run
# backup
cp /etc/samba/smb.conf{,-TEST)
# This will remove all special characters except the keyboard characters
perl
2017 Aug 30
2
Shares not accessible when using FQDN
Hi Rowland,
The reason is long to explain but shortly it was about huge amount of data ~20TB stored on that server with unix user ID (comming from a S3/LDAP setup). On a DC mode it seems unix ID are in use instead of idmap id.
CNAME is in added indeed.
Regarding the migration as said we came from S3/LDAP and go to 4.6. The entire future structure is not fixed yet but at this time we have a
2018 May 29
4
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
I think you missed these in the firewall, if you allowed the "in" for the DC, you also need the OUT.
49152:65535/tcp ALLOW OUT
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Gaetan SLONGO via samba
> Verzonden: dinsdag 29 mei 2018 16:40
> Aan: Rowland Penny
> CC: samba at lists.samba.org
2011 Mar 07
2
connection speeds between nodes
Hi All,
I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
setup i had in mind is as following:
All the data is already stored on a StorNext SAN filesystem (quantum )
this should be mounted on a centos server trough fiber optics , which
in its turn shares the FS over NFS to all the rendernodes
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hi,
Not sure sernet can help. It really looks like a samba issue to me..?
Just found this in logs when starting the RODC :
[2018/06/13 10:59:11.546077, 3, pid=12673, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:291(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
samba_runcmd_io_handler: Child /usr/sbin/winbindd exited 1
[2018/06/13 10:59:11.546131, 0, pid=12673, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
2018 Jun 13
4
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:05:23 +0200 (CEST)
Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
>
> Same, as said; winbind isn't started :-)
>
>
>
> [root at dmzrodc ~]# ps ax | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd"
> 650 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -u ntp:ntp -g
> 1205 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba -D
> 1225 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba
2018 Jun 13
2
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:33:48 +0200 (CEST)
Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Here it is. It talks about homes share but I think we don't care ?
> Final error is not explicit to me.. Maybe you?
>
>
>
> INFO: Current debug levels:
> all: 10
> tdb: 10
> printdrivers: 10
> lanman: 10
> smb: 10
> rpc_parse: