similar to: Must Samba4 AD be provisionned with rfc2307 to use winbind ?

I have been reading through an old thread and to be honest confused.com root at zent1:~# samba-tool domain level show params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/shares.conf" ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=office,DC=zentyal,DC=lan' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003

Apols guys about the Thread question. I saw a discussion between Roland and Steve and was just trying to get more info. So apols about hijacking an old thread as it was a bad attempt to nudge a conversion. Firstly could anybody explain why the last line out of samba-tool domain level show. Is this just a bad message or what is triggering "Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008

Hi all, (Trying to connect squid, postfix, dovecot, pptp, etc ... to AD) Samba 4.0.9, as PDC, on Ubuntu 12.04.3 server. Compiled with : ./configure --enable-debug --enable-selftest Domain provision : /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain provision Despite my reads and tries, I'm unable to list the AD users from Linux. /usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -t /usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -u

ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(&(objectclass=person)(name=Administrator))' name unicodePwd # record 1 dn: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=office,DC=zentyal,DC=lan name: Administrator unicodePwd:: kXh1DQFudwnw+lnHhubyUw== http://www.hashkiller.co.uk/ntlm-decrypter.aspx just took 242ms to return my password Only zent1 as its just a VM running a test of Zentyal3.5

Hi everyone, there have already been some talk in the past about the null session access on samba, and that keeping "restrict anonymous" parameter below level 2 was necessary for NT4 domain support. [1] However I was wondering if it could be changed. For instance, on a samba4.4.5 AD with the default settings, when you run the following command, you'll get the domain user list

Hi there. I'm trying to use thin provisionned LVM for som eguests, and I'm having a problem. Until now, I use LVM pool with success. Here's my pool definition: <pool type='logical'> <name>data</name> <uuid>7f18e030-9d2d-805e-c65f-d12d0681b0a9</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>0</capacity> <allocation

Hi: I want to test migrating windows dc to samba dc (without considering sysvol replication). I installed brand new 2003R2, 2008R2, 2012R2 (with 2008R2 functional level). I compiled samba 4.7.7, 4.8.1 at centos 7.4. 1. I tried to join samba as DC to windows with command: samba-tool domain join samdom.example.com DC -U"SAMDOM\administrator"

I ran some tests to see why getent passwd was not enumerating my domain users and discovered this: If I getent passwd <username> it returns the user information including the primary group defined in the Unix attributes. If I add a Unix GID in the idmap config range to the domain's Domain Users group and getent passwd, it returns all of my domain users with all of the Unix attributes as

Hi, After upgrading the Windows DCs from Windows 2003R2 to Windows 2008R, the domain functional level was raised from Windows 2000 to Windows 2008R2. As a consequence of this action, I found that a Application Management GPO no longer worked pushing applications to the companies desktops. After some tweaking I found out in one MS document that a Windows 2008R2 domain can not authenticate a

Hi, Just noticed, I am unable to use nested groups when relying on RFC2307 for filesystem permissions, am I wright? What have I missed? (Samba 4.12 on Buster, 2008R2 domain level) Any migration path to stop using RFC2307 and go to pure idmap without loosing all permissions on a 6T filesystem? Is that a solution? Regards, -- *Marcio Merlone*

Hi, Reading samba wiki I'm trying to know if Windows 2019 is supported as member, Latest version on wiki seems is 2016 https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Client_or_Server_to_a_Domain Server (all editions): Windows Server 2016 Windows Server 2012 and 2012R2 Windows Server 2008 and 2008R2 Windows Server 2003 and 2003R2 Windows Server 2000 Windows 2019 is supported? Thanks

Hi, We recently updated our domain to 2008R2 servers from 2000. I know the services for unix changed from the proprietary setup in 2000 to rfc2307 compliant around 2003 R2 I've updated samba to 3.5.4 (apparently most earlier versions don't play well with the changes in AD), and gotten things essentially working. The problem is users created since the old 2000 servers have been

Hello, I've a share with preset permissions on different directories including acls. So in one folder for example users can only read and into other read and write. Everything works fine. The Problem is if one user decides to change the permission of a file or directory (via Windows) the acls and permissions get are messed up. How can I restrict users from changing permission on a share? I

Samba Team, I have posted this issue before but it seems to have gotten "lost in the storm." I have several Linux servers set up to authenticate users using AD credentials. The one server that actually works right is running Samba 3.2.7. The presence of RFC2307 attributes in the user object, in conjunction with a UID in the range set in smb.conf determines whether the user enumerates,

Running Samba 4.0.9, we have added a pair of Samba4 domain controllers to an existing Win2003 domain. How do we determine whether RFC2037 attributes already exist in the domain? And how would we go about adding them to an already existing domain?

Hai. >DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) >[127.0.1.1]: Means to me you installed with a DHCP ip and you didn't correct the /etc/hosts file. Second, you are running which os? And you installed samba from the distro first? You probely missed some files in removal. Check these things first please. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk

Hi, I experience a very strange behaviour when trying to instanciate a S4 class. A call like 'r <- new("MyClass", foo="bar")' returns apparently cleanly, but in fact a subsequent use of 'r' results in a 'r does not exist error message'. After a bit of hunting with 'debug', it seems that the bug is in 'initialize' (or one of the

Ok tomas. For a good removal of all samba packages. 1) for x in `dpkg -l | grep samba` ; do apt-get remove --purge $x ; done 2) apt-get remove --purge winbind That should clear all packages of samba. When thats done. Try the install again. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Thomas Massip [mailto:thomas.massip at e-tera.com] > Verzonden: woensdag 27

Hi all, I try to install a samba4 AD DC, but when I try: samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive I have this: Realm [DOMAINTEST.LAN]: Domain [DOMAINTEST]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [127.0.1.1]:

I'm trying to remove a DC from a Samba4 based AD network, but run into an error that I can't fathom. Can anyone point me in the right direction? # samba-tool domain demote -Uadministrator GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5_sasl' registered GENSEC backend 'spnego' registered GENSEC