similar to: ctdb PARTIALLYONLINE

When I do a database show, I get something like this: /SIP/Registry/202 : 192.168.1.89:5060:3600:202:sip:202@192.168.1.89:5060 /SIP/Registry/203 : 192.168.1.89:5060:3600:203:sip:203@192.168.1.89:5060 /SIP/Registry/211 : 24.184.18.140:5060:60:211:sip:211@192.168.1.11:5060 /SIP/Registry/212 : 192.168.1.86:5060:60:212:sip:212@192.168.1.86:5060 /SIP/Registry/213 :

Hi, I am testing CTDB failover cases. For one of my test case I need to bring one of the nodes to partially online state . Looking for help with the configuration that needs to be done to reach to this state. Thanks, Surabhi NOTE: I am testing CTDB2.5 version

Hi 2 node ctdb 2.5.3 on Ubuntu 14.04 nodes apparmor teardown and firewall and stopped dead The IP takeover is working fine between the nodes: Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Trigger takeoverrun Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Takeover run starting Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.81/24 on interface bond0 Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.80/24 on

Hi All, I have set up a box that will be used as follows: SIP Phone ----> Asterisk ----> Cisco H323 VoIP Server 192.168.1.5 192.168.1.50 192.168.1.80 Asterisk is running the latest CVS and oh323 driver. The SIP phone is a Grandstream Budgetone 100. I have everything setup and running with G.711 ALAW and ULAW and i'm able to make calls through

Let's see I've got a network about 10 PCs running XP and 1 running Linux. I had setup Samba and it was running like a charm. XP pcs could access linux box through network neighborhood and access 2 shared dir and edit/change files. Really not sure what has gone wrong. I am using Samba 2.2.8a I run both smbd and nmbd as daemons. When I run ps -aux they show up. root 1553 0.0

Hi, I''m setting up my first xen machine, and I''m trying to setup two Virtual Machines, each mapped to a physical adapter on a different network. The virtual machine mapped to xen-br0 and eth0 works fine. However, when I bring up a VM with this configuration file: ----------------- name = "test77" kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11.12-xenU" root =

I'm trying to debug a NAT issue and I can't make up my mind if the problem is with my Vigor 2800 or Asterisk 1.6.2. I know the Draytek is alleged to suffer from nat 'issues' but I did not have the issue with 1.6.1 - so I'm wondering if something has changed? The Draytek offers 'NAT & Routed' on a single device - so my Asterisk sits on a Public IP, and I have a

Hi, I have an application completed that was built with RoR on windows. So this of course was tested with the webbrick server. I now want to put the project on our apache web server for production. I am having a very hard time getting this accomplished. I followed some of the steps here (because not all of them worked):

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

Hi! I installed CentOS 7 today, it's a minimal install, so it didn't have ifconfig command. So I installed net-tools, however I can't add ipv6 address to it. # ifconfig enp0s3 add fc00::1002/124 SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied. Yes, I'm running as root. CentOS is running in a Qemu instance with e1000 ethernet card.

> >> Who are you logged into the Windows PC as ? > > I log in az A\Administrator. I created an admin user, put in Domain > > Admins group, but the result was the same (ok, it would be strange, if > > it would work with it, instead of Administrator) > Then you need to ensure that 'Domain Admins' has the same privilege as > 'A\Administrator' Ok, I

>From time to time on centos 6 sssd I got login problems like 'connection closed by *.*.*.*.', after a while then I login in again and the problem already disappeared.? For the ssh login problem, I can see the following entries in /var/log/secure. 'Failed public key for ....' ?is the entry for the login problem. Any one has some ideas why this happens? Mar 12 04:30:12 master01

Hi, I'd want to configure persistent static routes, ie in config files, but I can't configure static routes, I tested: [root at centos7 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/routes-enp0s3 ADDRESS0=10.10.10.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 logs says nothing: ago 27 15:38:29 centos7.vhgroup.corp NetworkManager[2299]: <info> Activation (enp0s3) Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4

On 10/08/16 16:29, Levente Birta wrote: > And as I said this problem is resolved too ... I asked for another way > to achieve this When you add a default gateway with: route add default gw 192.168.1.1 dev enp3s0 you'll note that you now have 2 routes with the same metric of 0 (use route -n to see the metric field - couldn't get ip route to show me the metric). When using ip

On 08/09/2016 12:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > those are both the same network, and the default gateway is a global > thing. packets forwarded to 192.168.1.1 could use either 192.168.1.12 > or .13, as they are all the same. in reality, they will use the first > match they find. Generally, but not necessarily. What Birta is trying to accomplish is called

2015-11-12 15:56 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de>: > On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as >> follows: >> >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own >> address as source address >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0:

I am installing a new Samba 4.2 Active Directory server on CentOS 7. I followed the Wiki instructions on how to create the server. I am using sernet-samba 4.2 binaries. Everything seems to be OK on the Linux side but I cannot get any windows client to successfully join the domain. Each attempt returns the following error message "RPC Server in not available". Below are the config file

2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier <jpeltier at sfu.ca>: > ----- Original Message ----- > | Hi, > | > | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as > | follows: > | > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own > | address as source address > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received

Hi, I hope someone can help me with the following problem. I followed the following guides to setup samba as an additional active directory server to my windows server with bind9 dns: https://www.tecmint.com/join-additio...r-replication/<https://www.tecmint.com/join-additional-ubuntu-dc-to-samba4-ad-dc-failover-replication/>

Hello, I am trying to upgrade our domain controller to 4.2.0 from 4.1.16, however samba will not start after the upgrade. It appears to be related to the fact that this AD domain was created by running classicupgrade. My test environment, which was originally provisioned from 4.0 does not have this problem. This server was originally deployed back in 2004 using Samba3 and OpenLDAP. We upgraded