Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "smbd does not start under ctdb"
2014 Oct 07
1
CDTB On Samba 4.1.12 As Member files server.
Hello all,
I've some CTDB issue which I'm not sure where to start...
I follow this guide by steve which is nice.
The different on what have is that I don't have drbd running...
Also I've 4 x GE which is all Connected to a switch with different ip but
same subnet
This is suppose to load balance the traffic as under samba dns, they all
have the same name.
I'm only planing 3
2011 Apr 11
1
[CTDB] how does LMASTER know where the record is stored?
Greetings list,
I was looking at the wiki "samba and clustering" and a ctdb.pdf, admittedly
both are quite old (2006 or 2007) and I don't know how things change over
years, but I just have two questions about LMASTER:
< this is from pdf >
LMASTER fixed
? LMASTER is based on record key only
? LMASTER knows where the record is stored
? new records are stored on LMASTER
Q1.
2016 Nov 09
4
CTDB and samba private dir (+ldap)
hi everyone
an attempt to set up a cluster, I'm reading around and see
some howto writers would say to put "private dir on the FS
cluster" - one question I have: is this correct? necessary?
I have partial success, I get:
$ ctdb status
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0 10.5.6.32 OK
pnn:1 10.5.6.49 UNHEALTHY (THIS NODE)
Generation:323266562
Size:2
hash:0 lmaster:0
hash:1
2016 Aug 31
3
status of Continuous availability in SMB3
hi Michael Adam:
Thanks for you work on samba. Here I am looking for some advice and your help.
I have been stuck in continuous availability of samba 4.3.9 for two weeks. Continuous availability in SMB3 is an attractive feature and I am strugling to enable it.
smb.conf, ctdb.conf are attached. Cluster file system is cephfs and mount to /CephStorage
client: Windows 8 Pro
root at node0:~# samba
2018 Jun 28
4
CTDB upgrade to SAMBA 4.8.3
Hello,
i upgraded my ctdb cluster (3 nodes) from samba 4.7.7 to 4.8.3. Followed
the steps under "policy" in this wikipage
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_CTDB_cluster. I shutdown
all CTDB nodes and upgraded them. After the upgrade i started all nodes
and ctdb status shows:
Number of nodes:3
pnn:0 192.168.199.52 OK (THIS NODE)
pnn:1 192.168.199.53 OK
pnn:2
2014 Jul 11
1
ctdb PARTIALLYONLINE
drbd ctdb ocfs2
Hi
Everything seems OK apart from the IP takeover.
public_addresses
192.168.1.80/24 enp0s3
192.168.1.81/24 enp0s3
ctdb status
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0 192.168.1.10 PARTIALLYONLINE
pnn:1 192.168.1.11 PARTIALLYONLINE (THIS NODE)
Generation:2090727463
Size:2
hash:0 lmaster:0
hash:1 lmaster:1
Recovery mode:NORMAL (0)
Recovery master:1
but we are getting:
2014/07/11
2012 May 24
0
Could not find node to take over public address
Hi,
we run ctdb with samba on SLES11. It was running for some month ok but
after an update of the system and ctdb it fails to run.
I tried to setup a new ctdb setup on two other nodes and it still fails
with the same error.
After startup the status is:
> ctdb status
> Number of nodes:2
> pnn:0 10.94.43.7 DISABLED
> pnn:1 10.94.43.8 DISABLED (THIS NODE)
>
2016 Jul 03
4
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On 03/07/16 13:06, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
>> We've had a strange issue after following the recommendations at
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ping_pong, particularly the part
>> about mmap coherence. We are running CTDB/Samba over a MooseFS
>> clustered FS, and we'd not done the ping-pong before.
2008 Jun 04
0
CTDB problems: 1) Unable to get tcp info for CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_CLIENT, 2) ctdb disable doesn't failover
greetings,
trying to follow tridge's failover process at
http://samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html
I encounter this error.
oss02:~ # smbstatus -np
Processing section "[homes]"
Processing section "[profiles]"
Processing section "[users]"
Processing section "[groups]"
Processing section "[local]"
Processing section
2011 Sep 08
1
ctdb node disable windows xcopy break
Hi,
What did I miss / do wrong? My config didn't work like on the
below linked video:
http://www.samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html
With my config, the copy process fails/breaks despite that the
tesztxp PC successfully maps the other (samba) PC in case the
first (samba) PC is out. In the samba logs (even at log level = 10)
I didn't see any information that can help me solve
2008 Dec 04
1
Join multiple CTDB managed Samba servers into Active Directory
Hi ,
I have set up a 2-node CTDB cluster serving NFS and CIFS authenticating
Windows and Linux users via Active Directory.
The setup works fine, except only one server in the CTDB-cluster is able to
join the AD domain at a given instance. If you manually add the other server
into AD, the already connected server gets disconnected. There is no
specific error message logged in /var/log/message or
2016 Jul 03
2
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On 03/07/16 21:47, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 08:42:36PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
>> I've only put the "private dir" onto MooseFS, as instructed in the CTDB
>> docs.
> Can you quote these docs, so that we can correct them?
>
>> So, in that case, I'm assuming from your comments that it is no worry
>> that the mmap test does not
2020 Aug 05
2
CTDB question about "shared file system"
Could I impose upon someone to provide some guidance? Some hint? Thank you
Is a shared file system actually required? If etcd is used to manage the
global recovery lock, is there any need at that point for a shared file
system?
In other words, are there samba or CTDB files (state) that must be on a
shared file system, or can each clustered host simply have these files
locally?
What must be
2012 May 11
0
CTDB daemon crashed on bringing down one node in the cluster
All,
I have a 3 node CTDB cluster which serves 4 'public addresses'.
/etc/ctdb/public_addresses file is node specific and present in
the above path in participating nodes. All the nodes run RHEL 6.2.
Other ctdb config files such as "nodes" and "public_addresses" are placed
on a shared filesystem mounted on a known location (say, /gluster/lock)
On starting CTDB
2014 Jul 03
0
ctdb split brain nodes doesn't see each other
Hi,
I?ve setup a simple ctdb cluster. Actually copied the config file from an existing system.
Thats what happens:
Node 1, alone
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0 10.0.0.1 OK (THIS NODE)
pnn:1 10.0.0.2 DISCONNECTED|UNHEALTHY|INACTIVE
Generation:1369816268
Size:1
hash:0 lmaster:0
Recovery mode:NORMAL (0)
Recovery master:0
Node1, after start of ctdb on Node 2
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0
2016 Aug 31
0
status of Continuous availability in SMB3
On 2016-08-31 at 08:13 +0000, zhengbin.08747 at h3c.com wrote:
> hi Michael Adam:
> Thanks for you work on samba. Here I am looking for some advice and your help.
> I have been stuck in continuous availability of samba 4.3.9 for two weeks. Continuous availability in SMB3 is an attractive feature and I am strugling to enable it.
>
> smb.conf, ctdb.conf are attached. Cluster file
2018 May 04
2
CTDB Path
Hello,
at this time i want to install a CTDB Cluster with SAMBA 4.7.7 from SOURCE!
I compiled samba as follow:
|./configure| |--with-cluster-support
||--with-shared-modules=idmap_rid,idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad|
The whole SAMBA enviroment is located in /usr/local/samba/.
CTDB is located in /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb.
I guess right that the correct path of ctdbd.conf (node file, public
address file
2018 Jun 28
0
CTDB upgrade to SAMBA 4.8.3
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:30:07 +0200
Micha Ballmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i upgraded my ctdb cluster (3 nodes) from samba 4.7.7 to 4.8.3.
> Followed the steps under "policy" in this wikipage
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_CTDB_cluster. I shutdown
> all CTDB nodes and upgraded them. After the upgrade i started
2016 Nov 09
0
samba CTDB inability to create smb.conf cache
hi everyone
any experience with ctdb?
I'm setting up a simple cluster, only ldap backend instead
of tdb2.
One (of the two) server fails this way:
50.samba: ERROR: smb.conf cache create failed
$ ctdb status
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0 10.5.6.32 OK
pnn:1 10.5.6.49 UNHEALTHY (THIS NODE)
Generation:323266562
Size:2
hash:0 lmaster:0
hash:1 lmaster:1
Recovery mode:NORMAL (0)
Recovery
2016 Nov 09
0
CTDB and samba private dir (+ldap)
On 09/11/16 16:05, lejeczek via samba wrote:
> hi everyone
>
> an attempt to set up a cluster, I'm reading around and see
> some howto writers would say to put "private dir on the FS
> cluster" - one question I have: is this correct? necessary?
>
> I have partial success, I get:
>
> $ ctdb status
> Number of nodes:2
> pnn:0 10.5.6.32 OK
>