similar to: corrupt sam.ldb on a dc

Hello; last week the power (energy) of the servers fail and it shutdown all. When the power restart in the check I find that the samba4 AD DC have problems. It work, but the users in some of the container or OU dissapear, I mean, when I check with the RSAT the OU in with the user most be, is empty When I try to run # samba-tool dbcheck this is what I have: [root at gtmad ~]# samba-tool

Hi all, We seem to have some issues with our samba4 ad setup. I posted about this last week already but had received no replies at all so far. :-( What is our situation: two domain controllers (dc1 and dc2), one (separate) fileserver, all running sernet-4.1.7. From the workstations perspective, everything is running as it should, there appear to be no issues. However: something in my

On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 12:32 +0400, HB via samba wrote: > > > Here is the output of samba-tool dbcheck : > # samba-tool dbcheck > Checking 1791 objects > ltdb: tdb(/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC%3DDOMAINDNSZONES,DC%3DCIRAD-REUNION,DC%3DCIRAD,DC%3DFR.ldb): tdb_rec_read bad magic 0xd9fee666 at offset=1115322096 > > ltdb:

On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 13:46 +0400, HB via samba wrote: > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org] > > Envoyé : samedi 26 août 2017 12:40 > > À : HB; samba at lists.samba.org > > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > > > > On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 12:32 +0400, HB via samba wrote: > > >

> -----Message d'origine----- > De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de Rowland > Penny via samba > Envoyé : samedi 26 août 2017 12:00 > À : samba at lists.samba.org > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > ... > On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:28:00 +0400 > > Hi, > > > > I have begun to add a new 4.6.7 DC (following

Not sure if this is best sent to samba or samba-technical. If an admin thinks this is best sent to technical, let me know and I'll resend it there. Hi all, Well I've managed to land myself in a bit of a heap. I've been successfully running Samba4 at two schools I administer as well as my home test network, starting with alpha17 and now on beta8. Group Policy works a charm. But

> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org] > Envoyé : samedi 26 août 2017 12:40 > À : HB; samba at lists.samba.org > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > > On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 12:32 +0400, HB via samba wrote: > > > > > Here is the output of samba-tool dbcheck : > > # samba-tool dbcheck >

Hello, I have Samba 4.3.11 running as an ADDC on Ubuntu 14.04. When I run samba-tool dbcheck, I get the following output: ltdb: tdb(/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=CORP,DC=EXAMPLE,DC=CO,DC=NZ.ldb): tdb_rec_read bad magic 0x3f3f3f3f at offset=2993916 ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - Indexed and full searches both failed! File

Dear all. Let me make a shot brief of the issue I'm currently experiencing that has been published in a couple of threads. Now I'm going to join them here. Current scenario. Centos7 running a Samba 4.6.5. Any kind of problem at client side, all seems to runs fine. But in some cases the AD objects appears on Windows clients as their SID instead of their name. Rowland has suggested to

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:37:38 -0500 Denis Morejon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi: > > I have two samba 4.7.4 DCs. One of them has problems. I can not use > samba-tool on it. Then, when I try to fix It's database It returns: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >

El 31/07/18 a las 07:35, Rowland Penny via samba escribió: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:37:38 -0500 > Denis Morejon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I have two samba 4.7.4 DCs. One of them has problems. I can not use >> samba-tool on it. Then, when I try to fix It's database It returns: >> >>

Hi, Some time ago one of my public servers (running Slackware64 14.0) got attacked and was misused to send phishing emails. This misadventure made me more concerned about security, so I spent the last few weeks catching up on security, reading docs about SELinux and how to use it, etc. I have a public sandbox server running CentOS 7, and I'm currently experimenting quite a lot with Apache

using samba 4.1.4 syslog have alot of those in log: [2014/07/22 13:24:12.22351, 0] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:71(ldb_wrap_debug) ldb: ltdb: tdb(/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=LOCAL.ldb): tdb_rec_read bad magic 0x0 at offset=516897176 Anything I can do to fix it?

Hi, I've been running Squid successfully on CentOS 7 (and before that on 6 and 5), and it's always been running nicely. I've been using it mostly as a transparent proxy filter in school networks. So far, I've only been able to filter HTTP. Do any of you do transparent HTTPS filtering ? Any suggestions, advice, caveats, do's and don'ts ? Cheers from the snowy South of

I've been called back to an old workplace to try to help with some issues that they have and have found that the DomainDnsZones database is not replicating. Everything else in the replication seems to be fine. I ran a samba-tool dbcheck on the affected server and it returns: ltdb: tdb(/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=MYCOMPANY.ldb): tdb_rec_read bad magic

On 10/08/2019 13:14, amitkuma--- via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to use samba-tool to create OU on active directory. > > 1. Joined to domain. > # net ads join -U <> > > 2. Listed GPO's on domain to check samba-tool script can pull the GPOs. > # samba-tool gpo listall > GPO : <> > display name : test-Computers-GPO-1 > path

On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:08:39 +0100 Luis Peromarta via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > LP > On Jun 21, 2024 at 12:02 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > > > > Up until here it was 'DC=mydomain,DC=int', then it becomes something > > different, bad sanitisation ? > > > > Yes :( > >

On 03/03/2023 19:36, Peter Pollock via samba wrote: > I've been called back to an old workplace to try to help with some issues > that they have and have found that the DomainDnsZones database is not > replicating. Everything else in the replication seems to be fine. > > I ran a samba-tool dbcheck on the affected server and it returns: > > ltdb: >

All, is anyone using Bayonne in conjunction with Asterisk? I'm currently using only Bayonne, but I'm investigating the possibilities of switching the telephony frontend over to Asterisk, and have Asterisk route the IVR tasks to Bayonne through H323. Anyone care to share his views on this approach? Any pointers or do's and don'ts? All info is greatly appreciated! Regards,

Hello, I am trying to use samba-tool to create OU on active directory. 1. Joined to domain. # net ads join -U <> 2. Listed GPO's on domain to check samba-tool script can pull the GPOs. # samba-tool gpo listall GPO : <> display name : test-Computers-GPO-1 path : \\atest.com\SysVol\atest.com\Policies\<> dn :