similar to: using git to stay current

I think I would like to use git to get the latest 'stable' of samba, and then use success get pull on the same samba version to keep up with security patches added to stable. Is this a valid way to 'manage' a production samba instance? I doubt I would be adding 'code'. I view using git as a way to get the latest stable version of samba which my current distribution of linux

Will a samba 4.1.9 work fine if there are newer samba 4.x AD DC in the domain? I compiled samba 4.1.9 from source on ubuntu 14 server. Now I am wondering if I can use the debian backports repo and get whatever samba is current there --is is amba 4.1.11 ? Not sure if its worth it to compile samba for each of my addc's, or if I can be lazy and use the deb from a repo. Would love

Thank you for the excellent advice. so an lxc container should be a privilege vm. Do containers share the same file system like a BSD chroot jail? Or do they have a virtual disk image like vmware or virtual box? Sorry to be dense here. If you know of any good tutorials on making lxc containers, I'd like to read them. My thinking was that I would make an lxc container for the addc instance

Hi David Thanks you for reply, are you sure about this? Windows and Samba SMB byte range locking feature doesn't allow this by locking regions of a single file ? From: "David Bear" <dwbear75 at gmail.com> To: "Dante F. B. Colò" <dante.colo at stwbrasil.com> Cc: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:59:56 PM

I went through the upgrade process describe here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba after grabbing the samba 4.1.13 source I configured, make and make installed the new source over the top of my existing 4.1.9 code. I expected that the install would copy over the top of existing python and binaries but this seems to not be the case. My first clue was running bin/samba-tool dbcheck

Is there a list of GPO functions that are known not to work with samba 4.1 ? We have a case where some settings in a GPO will get applied, and others don't. -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:

I have been wanting to allow our routers to continue to serve dhcp thinking this would give us a safer fail environment. Now we are learning that our routers can handle creating a whitelist of mac addresses to use for dhcp leases. So we need to look at alternatives. I am wondering how many samba AD DC's also run dhcp -- and if there is a samba 'good practice' for managing dhcp. Yes, I

my first round of trying to compile samba 4.2 from source in an lxc container. Host OS is ubuntu 14.04 lts, and lxc template was the ubuntu template. This is a privileged container. good news, is the container seems to function well. Bad news is missing dependancies. So, in tracking down depenancies, here's what I installed in to the container apt-get install python apt-get install

I currently have a samba 3.6 pdc. I would like to migrate that to a samba 4 dc. I haven't been able to google out all the 'samba migration' hits that meet my specific use case. Sorry if there is something blindingly obvious on this topic. Is it possible to set up a samba 4 dc, and have it capture the sambe 3.6 pdc info? Currently, samba uses tdbsam. (no ldap) It runs on an Centos

A "good" acl manual. http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/ACL/linux-acl.html As i do prefeer the debian os, but i do really like the archlinux wiki. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Access_Control_Lists Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Frank Kahle > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 augustus 2016 13:55

We had a samba 4.1.9 AD DC running since July. We have 3 campuses and brought up a secondary AD at another campus. This setup seemed to be running as expected. We could see our primary AD DC authenticating requests fine. We could see the secondary AD authenticating requests as well at our second campus. Then we started experiencing bandwidth issues between our campuses. Our metro-etherlink

I want to have samba be the back end provider for authentication to a radius server. I found https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/VPN_Single_SignOn_with_Samba_AD and wanted to see if this is 'current' and works with samba 4.1.8 -- or if anyone is using it. I want to use RADIUS authentication on a firewall and have Samba be the source for the user accounts. I am using a pfsense firewall.

On 24 October 2013 17:32, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at azulsystems.com> wrote: > Hello llvm-dev! > > My colleages and I are currently evaluating llvm's suitability as a > JIT compiler interfacing with a precise, relocating garbage collector. > While we couldn't find code or writeups that deal with the issues > specific to this design goal, it is entirely possible that we

Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and how much virtual hardware to give each VM. I'm wondering about virtual nics and if there may be a

On 09/12/2016 01:17 PM, Jeff Sadowski via samba wrote: > This thread has me thinking about good ways to use python with web pages. > Maybe php or just flat HTML for the main page and have python work with cgi > to pass information with json's using AJAX > > Any thoughts on this? cgi is probably not what you want to do I doubt you want to make things complex by mixing php and

Hello llvm-dev! My colleages and I are currently evaluating llvm's suitability as a JIT compiler interfacing with a precise, relocating garbage collector. While we couldn't find code or writeups that deal with the issues specific to this design goal, it is entirely possible that we may have missed something; we would appreciate references to relevant code or writeups that people on this

I think winbind is required for file service isn't it? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 10/06/15 21:15, David Bear wrote: > > Thanks Rowland -- will attempt to pull the startup script from the deb > package. > > Just to clarify, When starting samba as an AD DC, we use the samba-ad-dc > script, when

2015-05-12 21:50 GMT+02:00 David Bear <dwbear75 at gmail.com>: > Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than > a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common > to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? > > If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and > how much

I dont know much about Solaris, but i found this. There are problems with ACL's across platforms: the uid has to match numerically the gid has to match numerically the NSF mount has to support the ACL operations, e.g., if the ACL grants write, but the remote file system is read-only then the ACL can not be honored. See: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ar01s06.html Greetz, Louis