similar to: sysvol replication and posix uid / gid mapping

I am running a Debian Squeeze Xen 4.0.1 Hypervisor and 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 dom0. My xen-tools.conf: lvm = vg00 size = 100Gb # Disk image size. memory = 2048Mb # Memory size swap = 2G # Swap size # noswap = 1 # Don''t use swap at all for the new system. fs = ext4 # use the EXT3 filesystem for the disk image. dist = `xt-guess-suite-and-mirror --suite` # Default

Hi, I've been using Samba 3 (standalone server, workgroup setup) for a long looong time and now I want to migrate to Samba 4 AD DC setup with clients joined to the newly created AD domain and all the bells and whistles that come with it. I've setup an AD DC (Debian wheezy with samba from backports) that will only handle authentication and a second AD DC that will also serve shares.

I think I wrote not very clearly. I say ''swap in domU will save in case lag or little mistake with balloon''. If course, there is no any kind of ballooning for dom0. Right now we running pretty much VMs for our cloud services and we use heavy memory management (it grabs and gives memory with lag less then second depends on usage in customers VM). And we have some statistics

Hi List, is it possible to limit the (disc) io for a domU? Best regrads, Mike _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

When reading the wiki page about setting up new shares there is some information missing. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs The information I am missing most here is which posix.1 ACLs to set after creating the shares directory. There is only # mkdir -p /srv/samba/Demo/ but on my system that will create a directory that is owned by root:root

Hi, I've created an Active Directory domain with 2 samba 4 running in debian (I'm using the latest 4.1.x sernet packages). Everything is running perfectly but I've found that I also have to configure sysvol replication (that I didn't), looking at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Replication I've found this statement: ... for rsync-based SysVol replicaton, you have to

Hi All, 1) I read that the devs are working on supporting AD 2012 in 4.11, very cool. 2) I read SAMBA 4.11 can support 100,000 users and 120,000 computers, very cool. It appears that SAMBA is moving to be a viable file server, authentication and authorization server that can replace Microsoft Active Directory - Directory Services. Is this possible before 2030 for business with multiple sites

Hello Gabriel, Am 22.05.2015 um 15:23 schrieb Gabriel Franca: > Good morning people, > > I make the case that Achim Gottinger passed. > > samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset and received the following information: > Segmentation fault (core of the recorded image) > > then sent a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and received the following: > ERROR (<type

Hello List, we have a running (test) AD samba4 system running successful for several month. We are now trying to add more DCs to the mix and have a proper backup/desaster recovery strategy. Basically I wan't to adapt the samba_backup script found in the sources to backup everything via git into our repository. I understand that the best solution would be to tar everything before commit. In

Hello Gabriel, I recommend you use gpupdate /force on the windows command line after login. The results of above command can be checked afterwards with the "gpresults" command. Can be you have an permission problem on your samba server. Only skimmed ofver the thread but did you try samba-tools ntacl sysvolreset on your samba server? achim~ Am 22.05.2015 um 12:08 schrieb Gabriel

Good morning List On Friday I had to leave so I could no longer continue with our lab. Weekend and holy all have to rest as much as possible. = D So I'm back and I will put the smb.conf for analysis. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CMC realm = CMC.CORP netbios name = SAMBA server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder =

Hello, as it is often a question here on the lists and by many others on the internet, I wrote a new HowTo for setting up a SysVol replication "workaround", until Samba supports this feature by itself: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Replication For the replication process, I wrote a Bash script, put it on my webspace and linked it in the HowTo, which should describe

Hello Johannes, Am 18.12.2014 um 12:23 schrieb johannesa: > Basically I wan't to adapt the samba_backup script found in > the sources to backup everything via git into our repository. > I understand that the best solution would be to tar > everything before commit. You don't have to use tar. But you have to ensure, that you have a backup, that includes the extended ACLs and

Just to mention and because I'm in doubt: The samba_backup script contains tdbdump for private folder to create online dumps of all ldb. But the dumps are smaller than the original. Is that ok? I'm in doubt regarding integrity. Am 20. Dezember 2014 10:59:59 MEZ, schrieb Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org>: >Hello Johannes, > >Am 18.12.2014 um 12:23 schrieb johannesa:

2015-05-22 13:32 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Franca <gabriel.franca at gmail.com>: > > I found it strange more and something I have already noticed a while. > > No GPO is applied when the User is the "Domain Users", so I wonder if I'm > doing something wrong or I have to change something. > > I believe the "Domain Users" are not allowed to change the

Good morning everyone, Gabriel: I haven't had a chance to test this yet, but I'm also needing the same IE: Domain Users to have the GPO applied. Did you come right with this? Andrey: Thank you for letting me know about the SysVol replication across DC's, I haven't enabled this yet and will be doing so, is there anything I should watch out for? I'll just be using the "

I thought this can be useful to someone, so here it goes. I am using automatic SysVol replication with the help of "watcher", a recursive incron. https://github.com/splitbrain/Watcher "Watcher is a daemon that watches specified files/folders for changes and fires commands in response to those changes. It is similar to incron, however, configuration uses a simpler to read ini

FYI: This bug also breaks user supplied scripts (/etc/xen/scripts/block-*) that are needed to handle block device mounting other than "phy:" and "file:" disks. See attached email from debian-user mailing list. cheers -henrik -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Henrik Langos <hlangos-debian at innominate.com> Subject: Re:

Hello! I'm using i868 (Pentium III) machine running Windows 2000 and running Linux, installed on dedicated partition, in parallel via VMWare. Linux config is RedHat 7.0 (kernel ) As I'm pretty new to Linux, I'd like to know exact procedure how to install ext3 filesystem support (also which packages do I need). My kernel config is as follows: kernel-headers-2.2.14-5.0

Hi all, CTDB seems to be needing an underlaying GlusterFS. Would it be possible to declare a second GlusterFS share to host Sysvol data? I have no experience about distributed file systems, so I'm not sure this GlusterFS file system would act as a normal FS (modulo locking process) from Samba point of view when it access to that FS. Then Samba would share this through CIFS these data...