similar to: ldbsearch core dump

Add support for OpenCL global memory buffers, note this has only been tested with regular load and stores and likely needs more work for e.g. atomic ops. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.h | 1 + .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_emit_gk110.cpp | 31 +++++++++++++++++-----

Hi, On 16-03-16 11:37, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > Could you please get rid of the cosmetic changes (eg. the switch ones)? > Because this doesn't really improve readability and in my opinion these changes should be eventually done in a separate patch. I need at least halve of those cosmetic changes, because half of them is not cosmetic, e.g. : - case FILE_MEMORY_BUFFER: code[1] =

FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL is currently only used for buffer handling, as we do not yet have (opencl) global memory support. Global memory support actually requires some different handling during lowering, so rename FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL to FILE_MEMORY_BUFFER to reflect that the current code is for buffer handling, this will allow the later (re-)addition of FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL for regular global memory.

Hi, On 16-03-16 15:55, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > This approach leads to the emitters needing to know about both global and > buffer, even though at that point, they are identical. I was thinking that > in the lowering logic, buffer would just get rewritten as global (with the > offset added), thus not needing any change to the emitters. What do you > think about such an approach? I was

I have tried this with a bunch of different versions of Samba, starting somewhere in the 3.0.1 series. I am currently running 3.0.34 on several Gentoo servers, all showing the same problem. I am almost positive it is not a Samba issue, but I was just hoping that someone may have experienced it and knows if there is a solution. When I have the current Novell Netware client installed on XP

Could you please get rid of the cosmetic changes (eg. the switch ones)? Because this doesn't really improve readability and in my opinion these changes should be eventually done in a separate patch. Other than that, this patch is : Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> Yes, this probably won't work as is for atomic operations but the lowering pass is

This approach leads to the emitters needing to know about both global and buffer, even though at that point, they are identical. I was thinking that in the lowering logic, buffer would just get rewritten as global (with the offset added), thus not needing any change to the emitters. What do you think about such an approach? On Mar 16, 2016 2:24 AM, "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede at

I am currently researching the possibility of slowly moving an existing Novell network [with all Windows clients except mine :)] to something Linux based. I have about 900 clients that would be slowly migrated if this whole thing is feasible. The version of NetWare we are using now is no longer "officially supported" from Novell, so it is becoming more and more difficult to successfully

Commit c3083c7082 ("nv50/ir: add support for BUFFER accesses") disabled / commented out some of the old resource handling code, but not all of it. Effectively all of it is dead already, if we ever enter the old code paths in handeLOAD / handleSTORE / handleATOM we will get an exception due to trying to access the now always zero-sized resources vector. Make non buffer / memory file

hi, know anybody why this happen ? I''m using winedt , the old code saved in an .R call syntax error''s. Curious is, when i''m type below the same code , it works ??? ...imho a print type problem, what i''m never before observed and can''t recognize with my eyes ? P.S. R.1.6.1 /w2k thanks for advance & regards,christian >>getfile <-

Hi, On 16-03-16 11:45, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 03/16/2016 10:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Commit c3083c7082 ("nv50/ir: add support for BUFFER accesses") disabled / >> commented out some of the old resource handling code, but not all of it. >> >> Effectively all of it is dead already, if we ever enter the old code >> paths in handeLOAD /

Hi all, Samba (sernet) 4.1.7, and we're getting high cpu usage on dc1, and on dc2 (my 'secondary' dc): root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\DC2 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 5e93a102-2963-496a-af16-0c51eebb2e31 DSA invocationId: 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=domain,DC=com

Use the dst temp variable which was used in the TGSI_FILE_OUTPUT case everywhere. This makes the code somewhat easier to reads and helps avoiding going over 80 chars with upcoming changes. This also brings the dst handling more in line with the src handling. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_from_tgsi.cpp | 12

Thanks for the details Todd. Much appreciated. Regards, Ross Levis. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org] > On Behalf Of Todd Poston > Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 08:30 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: RE: [icecast] playlist streams > > > Adon Irani wrote: > ------------------ > however, if you are using

Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi? Could you please double-check that? One minor comment below. On 03/17/2016 05:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Some of the lowering steps we currently do for FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL only > apply to buffers, making it impossible to use FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL for > OpenCL global buffers. > > This commits changes the buffer code to use

Add a specific optimisation pass for NV50 to check whether SRC0 or SRC1 is a MOV dst, IMM. If so: fold the IMM in and try to drop the MOV. Must be done post-RA because it is required that SDST == SSRC2. Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) diff --git

Add a specific optimisation pass for NV50 to check whether SRC0 or SRC1 is a MOV dst, IMM. If so: fold the IMM in and try to drop the MOV. Must be done post-RA because it requires that SDST == SSRC2. V2: improve readability and add comments to clarify decisions Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp | 60

Add a specific optimisation pass for NV50 to check whether SRC0 or SRC1 is a MOV dst, IMM. If so: fold the IMM in and try to drop the MOV. Must be done post-RA because it requires that SDST == SSRC2. V2: improve readability and add comments to clarify decisions V3: Remove redundant code... compiler already attempts to put the IMM in SSRC1 Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu>

Add a specific optimisation pass for NV50 to check whether SRC0 or SRC1 is a MOV dst, IMM. If so: fold the IMM in and try to drop the MOV. Must be done post-RA because it requires that SDST == SSRC2. V2: improve readability and add comments to clarify decisions V3: Remove redundant code... compiler already attempts to put the IMM in SSRC1 Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu>

On 04/08/2016 12:17 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 23-03-16 23:10, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi? >> Could you please double-check that? > > I just checked: > > lspci: > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT > 610] (rev a1) > > Before this patch-set: >