similar to: Issues with classicupgrade LDAP

Hi there, I've successfully migrated an extremely large Samba3 domain to Samba4. The platforms involved: Samba files (/var/lib/samba) copied from a Debian 6-based Samba3 PDC with an LDAP backend Debian 7 with Samba4 installed from backports, with slapd installed locally (and now disabled). However, a number of things appear to be wrong: dpadmin at samba4-dev0:~$ host -t SRV

I used "/usr/bin/time" to time how long it took to join a DC to our domain. It took 9 hours, 54 minutes and 16 seconds. The logs follow: Committing SAM database Sending DsReplicateUpdateRefs for all the replicated partitions Setting isSynchronized and dsServiceName Setting up secrets database Joined domain DIGIPEN.EDU (SID S-1-5-21-REDACTED) as a DC 35461.84user 26.13system

Hello, I am wondering if anyone else has thought that it might be good to be able to run multiple instances of samba on a single machine ? I currently accomplish this task with VMware and multiple vm's. But it seems to me that it may be simpler if samba were able to run multiple instenses, with unique configs and smbpasswds, binding to unique aliased ethernet devices! Such that on a single

Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I''ve been working with this for a few weeks and I''m getting sick... I''m trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the Lan. When I run the script it doesn''t appear any

I''m streaming audio over a WAN that is 1.5Mbit/s. The audio has to go both ways and can be over tcp or udp. The manufacturers recommend udp as it has less overhead but has a higher chance of dropping out. The audio requires 130-200kbit/s in each direction for a combined 260-400kbit/s. I have two transparent bridges on either side of the WAN to do traffic control. I split it so

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

>Miguel Ángel Domínguez Durán wrote: >> Hello again, >> First, excuse me for my poor english. >> I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running >> Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils >> bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something >> like >> this: >> >>

I have this: class htb 1:29 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 3000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1599b cburst 1611b Sent 33233 bytes 772 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 415 borrowed: 357 giants: 0 tokens: -3756376 ctokens: 128779 or this: class htb 1:21 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 3000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1599b cburst 1611b Sent 57554 bytes 618 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 193 borrowed: 425

I''m trying to implement something similar the the diagram in section 9.5.2.1 in the LARTC HOWTO, but must have missed something somewhere :( I''m trying to hack up wondershaper, as it looked like a good place to start.. Here''s where I currently at, but I''ve tried alot of different things, all failing, some worse than others. The end result is to throttle back 126

Hi All. We have a samba server at our location. We are facing out with some issue. User who have the account on the server are able to access "/" root access. I have tried to add an extra line In Home sharing, which is "path = %H", this lined solved my issue, but gave other issue. After implementing this line under Home share, I am not able to open any other user's

I followed the lnt quickstart <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html> directions but got this diagnostic when doing the setup: bash-3.2$ ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop /Users/dcallahan/mysandbox/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:284: UserWarning: The version spec\ ified requires normalization, consider using '0.4.1.dev0' instead of

Hi David, That's weird, I have setup LNT in multiple different distros and have never seen this. Looks like no one ever tested on the system you're running. Can you share a bit more of your environment? Also, you can check the setup.py to see if it does any stripping of package names, which could go wrong in the wrong environment. cheers, --renato On 29 January 2015 at 20:13, David

Hello, as of Jul 9, the LNT build bot on SystemZ shows red. The problem occurs in the "setup lit" test, which fails due to: Processing dependencies for LNT==0.4.2.dev0 Searching for typing Reading https://pypi.org/simple/typing/ Downloading

Hi, how i can write all users to my db (mysql example) if it is possible that get "unknown user", "auth failed" e.g.? dovecot 2.2.13 root at dev0:/home/fov# dovecot -n # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 8.0 ext4 auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master

Synopsis: samba 2.0.6 running under FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE is much faster than the same running under FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE, even after replacing the 3.4-RELEASE kernel with the 3.4-STABLE kernel. (This has been reported to FreeBSD GNATS as "kern/16605") I have 2.0.6 running under FreeBSD using the following smb.conf: [global] workgroup = <NT Domain> server string =

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> Changelog: v1: * Renamed _mlx5_rescan_driver to be mlx5_rescan_driver_locked like in other parts of the mlx5 driver. * Renamed MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VDPA to tbe MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VNET as a preparation to coming series from Eli C. * Some small naming renames in mlx5_vdpa. * Refactored adev index code to make Parav's SF series

Hi, all, We are using Samba 3.0.10 with an LDAP backend. It's been working fine for a long time. One strange thing that has come up today : I cannot add 1 specific domain user to the local Administrator group of Windows servers that are also in the domain. Adding the user to the admin group on a workstation works just fine. Adding other users to the admin group on the Windows servers

I'm using Samba 3.0.21b on Debian linux using a tdbsam database as a PDC for domain ADADOM. I have a problem with duplicate group mappings and need to delete some, however, I don't know which one is being used. Is there a way I can find out which ones have no users assigned to them? Here's the sorted output of "net groupmap list". The last three are the issue. I only

Hi ! I'm working in a educational administration, i've made a domain with a Samba 3.4.1 PDC with a LDAP backend. When a user log into an XP Workstation, i see in the log file a lot of "init_sam_from_ldap". In fact, instead of scanning only the user who try to connect, a lot of them are scanned. I've got about 600 account into the LDAP so the time needed by the user