similar to: Samba 4.1.7 seems slow when calculating access rights

Hi, I have searched here, and noticed some discussion lately on problems demoting a dc. In my case, all roles are on DC2, and DC1 & DC3 know that: root at DC1:/var/log/samba# samba-tool fsmo show InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com RidAllocationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

> OK, here is a patch which provides fine grained cpu utilization > reporting. Some notes: I really can''t see the point of this patch -- it isn''t necessary to log every scheduling operation to record CPU usage for a domain over multiple time scales. Simply exporting the cumulative CPU usage for all domains and polling it from dom0 will enable you to do this. If you do

Hi all, I'm having some very weird issues with some users in a Samba ADS configuration. (:: kerberos logins seems to give users different rights/group memberships ::) Sysinfo: OS: Debian 3.0 + some backports packages Kernel: 2.4.24-1-686-smp (from backports.org) Samba: 3.0.2a (from debian packages fetched from samba) Filesystem: ext3 (no acl patches or acl support) Configuration

----- On May 26, 2020, at 4:27 AM, Rowland Penny rpenny at samba.org wrote: >>> Not a huge domain - maybe 8 users or so. When you say in place >>> upgrade are you talking about upgrading Zentyal so that Samba gets >>> upgraded to at least 4.5 or above? >> Yes, or Samba on the Zentyal appliance - even if built manually and >> just pointed at the right

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:52:01 +0400 HB via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > Our Samba AD DC is running perfectly for years with the following > basic setup (see smb.conf below) : > - one DC running Samba 4.1.7 / CentOS 6.5 (compiled from > sources) > - internal DNS > - this DC is also a Print Server > - about

Just updated a DC from 4.1.6 to 4.1.7. After the update, it appears to be unable to bind any listening ports with the error NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER_MIX. This is on CentOS 6.5, running samba 4.1.7 RPMs from sernet. Just as a test, I did a brand new samba-tool provision, and still get the same results when starting, so I don't think it's anything in my configuration, unless there

I have a brand new NetBSD machine I am building to replace an existing one that is retiring. The current server runs an old version of Samba and I would like to upgrade this machine to something newer. The machine has basic NetBSD on it and that is about it (ie. very little if any customization to the out of the box configuration). I know NetBSD is probably not a mainstream platform for your

I originally posted this on the dev list and opened a bug for this but was asked to post this to the users list. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10565 Using sernet 4.1 packages. I am unable to get smbd to use private dir. Set option in smb.conf and on command line. sernet-samba-libsmbclient0-4.1.7-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-libs-4.1.7-7.el6.x86_64

17th I should say, apols -----Original message----- > From:Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org> > Sent: Monday 21st April 2014 15:06 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Arch Linux Samba 4.1.7 > > Just been playing with my new favourite distro Arch Linux. > > 4.1.7 been in there repo since the 12th and all seems fine. > > 4.1.7 for

I know I'm late reporting this but 1.08 seems really slow. It seems like it is as slow as some of the early RCs were. Wish I had more info. Using Maildir format.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32 Summary: ip_conntrack seems to track everything which can be very slow on HTTP Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |enhancement Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Hi, after the update from wu-imap to dovecot, opening e-mails on the imap server seems slower than with wu-imap. I haven't measured any speed yet, but clicking on a message in a folder takes sometimes a couple of seconds to open the mail. Any ideas or performance tips or information you need? Regards G?tz -- G?tz Reinicke IT Koordinator - IT OfficeNet Tel. +49 (0) 7141 - 969 420 Fax

I've noticed that RODBC seems to be an order of magnitude slower in retrieving rows from a table than ODBC (or JDBC) access in other tools. I'm wondering why that is, and whether there are things I can do to improve performance beyond what I've tried. I've checked the documentation, and have tried the rows_at_time= and buffsize= options, which helped a little, but it is still

Dear all, Indexing matrices from the Matrix package with [i,j] seems to be very slow. For example: library(rbenchmark) library(Matrix) mm <- matrix(c(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), nr=20, nc=20) MM <- as(mm, "Matrix") lookup <- function(mat){ for (i in 1:nrow(mat)){ for (j in 1:ncol(mat)){ mat[i,j] } } } benchmark(lookup(mm), lookup(MM),

> -----Message d'origine----- > De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de Rowland > Penny via samba > Envoyé : lundi 21 août 2017 16:34 > À : samba at lists.samba.org > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:52:01 +0400 > HB via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello all,

Hi, I have a very large inbox (~146K mails) in Maildir format and dovecot seems to spend a lot of time rescanning the directory, especially when the server is loaded. I'm not sure whether this is triggered by Thunderbird or done regularly, but it takes longer when the server is loaded, so sometimes it seems that it is scanning continuously. Since it takes around 2000 getdents64() syscalls to

I have just upgraded my jumpstart server to S10 u2 b9a. It is an Ultra 10 with two 120GB EIDE drives. The second drive (disk1) is new, and has u2b9a installed on a slice, with most of the space in slice 7 for the ZFS pool I created pool1 on disk1, and created the filesystem pool1/ro (for legacy reasons). I them moved my data from the original disk0 UFS file system to pool1/ro. Initially I

Dear R Helpers I have following data - cash_flow = c(7, 7, 107)  # 107 = Principle 100 + interest of 7% t = c(1,2,3) and zero rate table as rating         year1           year2           year3 AAA            3.60            4.17              4.73 AA              3.65            4.22              4.78 A                 3.72           4.32              4.93 BBB            4.10           

On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:28:00 +0400 HB via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de > > Rowland Penny via samba > > Envoyé : lundi 21 août 2017 16:34 > > À : samba at lists.samba.org > > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > >