similar to: winbindd 4.1.7 resolves group memberships for all but primary group

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "winbindd 4.1.7 resolves group memberships for all but primary group"

2018 Aug 08
2
using Windows AD unwanted Group rights get applied to new Files
On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 22:43:23 +0100 Miguel Medalha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > By default, every AD user is a member of 'Domain Users' and so, > > when you use the 'rid' backend every Unix user gets the group as > > their primary group. > > > The only way to change this is by using a version of Samba >= 4.6.0 > > and
2017 May 05
2
Memory leak in samba-ad-dc on 4.5.x not related to aio?
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:21:05AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: > On 2017-05-05 10:09, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:42:47AM +0200, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > >>> root 9988 0.8 59.4 1571936 606488 ? S Apr26 114:41 /usr/sbin/samba > > > > Can you post /proc/9988/smaps somewhere? > > Sure,
2017 Aug 24
5
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
Ok, rechecked this, your correct. This did work fine. In now at samba 4.6.7, you? This worked untill ( last i checked ) 4.6.5 :-(( now sysvolreset is totaly broken. :-(( New thing for my ToDo list.. Try this script, the rights are my defaults "after a sysvol reset" Place the script somewhere within /var/lib/samba Preffered that location . Run it with : bash script.sh sysvol/ !
2014 Jan 15
2
Samba 4 and Debian
I've wasted the last two days trying to get various versions of samba 4 packages getting to run under Wheezy. ? Wheezy's own packages are incomplete betas. ? Inverse provides their own packages (for SOGo), but they only care about getting their one use case to work; smbd doesn't work all, winbind has problems, and the postinst script resets my smb.conf with nonsense. Before I try
2015 Aug 25
3
Questions about Samba 4
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:36:14AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: > On 2015-08-24 20:55, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: > > winbindd is extremely reliable and fully supported by the Samba > > Team, please don't post FUD about Samba components. If you have > > winbindd problems, post bug reports > > I did,
2015 Aug 24
4
Questions about Samba 4
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: > > Depends on your needs. If you don't need samba file/printer sharing > /from/ the member, I'd recommend using SSSD. It's much more stable and > reliable than winbindd. Can't let comments like this pass. sssd does something slightly different than winbindd, so may or may not be what the person needs.
2014 Dec 05
2
Samba embedded device?
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > Tbh, you might get away with using PCEngines' APU boards (the successor > to their Alix boards with a massively upgraded CPU) if individual > machines don't need RAID (because everything is replicated anyway). > I considered that, but what would you use for storage?? They have an mSATA
2016 Sep 28
2
Good Bye SAMBA?!?!?
Am 28.09.2016 um 04:01 schrieb Steve Litt via samba: > Why would ANYBODY type a command when they could perform a bunch of > mouse clicks. Better yet, you can automate Windows tools with a screen > scraper and a keyboard injector, or with a top notch language like > Powershell or Visual Basic *lol* why would ANYBODY click in a GUI when he have a console - and i mean that really
2017 Nov 13
2
Winbind error "Could not fetch our SID - did we join?"
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:20:05 +0100 Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > > > PS, your configs are still wrong. > > It would be *really* helpful if you explained *why*. Sprinkling magic > pixie dust over random config files isn't exactly purposeful > debugging. > Lets start with /etc/krb5.conf Samba doesn't need most of what you will find in it,
2017 Aug 24
4
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
On 2017-08-24 13:00, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:41:36 +0200 > Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 2017-08-24 12:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:03:42 +0200 >>> Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>
2017 Sep 05
4
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
> Keytabs look reasonable, as far as I can see, but why does > graz-dc-sem have the same SPN output as graz-dc-1b in > addition to its own? A snapshotted server/cloned server? I dont know but thats not correct. I suggest, cleanup the DS with FSMO roles. Then remove a failty server and re-add it as a new installed DC. ( the good DS with FSMO) First backup:
2017 Sep 05
3
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
Today's episode of "why is AD break", brought to you by: > [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015617, 3] ../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:613(gensec_gssapi_update) > Server GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at at AD.TAO.AT) unknown > [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015717, 0]
2017 Nov 13
2
Winbind error "Could not fetch our SID - did we join?"
/etc/hostname:villach-file /etc/hosts:# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts /etc/hosts:::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback /etc/hosts:ff02::1 ip6-allnodes /etc/hosts:ff02::2 ip6-allrouters /etc/hosts:127.0.0.1 localhost /etc/hosts:192.168.16.214 villach-file /etc/krb5.conf:[libdefaults] /etc/krb5.conf: default_realm = AD.TAO.AT /etc/krb5.conf: dns_lookup_realm = true
2017 Apr 20
2
NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS after removing a DC and WERR_BADFILE when trying to remove broken DC
On 2017-04-07 13:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the broken > ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was only necessary > to remove the IPs from DNS\_msdcs.ourdomain\gc\. Apparently not, adding new DCs failed with "WERR_DS_DATABASE_ERROR". `samba-tool dbcheck --fix` solved that. With that out of
2014 May 15
2
routed mode
Hi, I have installed a centos65_guest_1 system on a centos65 host with virt-manager. By default libvirt has a default network in NAT mode. At centos65_guest_1 when pinging to google it works. But I would like to use a routed mode for production enviroment with some services online, like http, ftp, ssh, etc. I have created the virtual network 192.168.100.0/24 with routed mode, and I have
2014 Jan 29
2
getent passwd and winbind not work
Hi, I test (replacement of nslcd ) winbind in member server. I used Samba4/Winbind howto and howto for member server. wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g work fine but getent passwd not work (getent not list user from AD) Why ? Anyone have a idea ? thx St?phane ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE Admin. Syst?mes et R?seaux Service Informatique
2014 Jul 31
2
XP and virtio
So I need to create a XP vm. I am using lvm logical volumes for its disk, so I am using virtio. I got the iso in http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/images/bin/images/, but how do I feed it to the XP install? I did try to mount it as a floppy and it hung there on "please wait"; I guess that means it did not like a 70MB iso as its floppy. But it also does not seem to
2017 Nov 13
2
Winbind error "Could not fetch our SID - did we join?"
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:32:11 +0100 Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Making no additional changes to the configuration, using "net ads > join" instead of "samba-tool domain join" immediately worked. I'd be > really curious where's the difference between the two and why > samba-tool pretends to not have run into any errors…
2017 May 05
2
Memory leak in samba-ad-dc on 4.5.x not related to aio?
On somewhat long-running samba AD DC instances (4.5.8-Debian, Stretch), we're seeming massive RAM utilization even with little/no clients connected: > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > root 9937 0.0 0.7 532004 7364 ? Ss Apr26 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba > root 9980 0.0 0.4 532004 4304 ? S Apr26 0:00
2014 Jul 08
3
log level sticks at 2
Hi, Seems log level can not be defined in smb.conf any longer. No matter what i define in [global], testparm -v always reports it at 2. This is on debian wheezy with sernet 4.1.9-8. achim~