similar to: sfu deprecated in 2012 R2

Hi Nagendra here I have existing a samba-3 installation which has a smb encrypt as mandatory i.e : smb encrypt* =* mandatory I am trying to connect to this machine's share with windows & I am getting the following error on the windows 8 client System error 5 has occurred. Access is denied. But I use the same client machine to access another windows-8 machine with SMB encryption I am

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi Volker and the list > > Yesterday the problem appeared again > > I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on > and this is the result > > [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 > Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit > 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW,

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 01:38:26PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi again Volker (& list) > > I think I am very closer of the problem. Sorry, but without access to this system I can't really say what is going on. Please talk to Oracle for support. Samba is running fine on a huge variety of file systems, and if ACFS gives you locking issues, I would request Oracle to fix their

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > Is this our snprintf or one from Solaris ? Can > > > you try and track down why it's returning

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:44:24AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Ok, it is becoming a nightmare ;-) > Last question Volker > > Is it possible the problem comes from a network device? > At job, we have been suffering problems with a F5 Load Balancer. It seems > that, randomly, it sets the transmission frame to 0 bytes during a while > and routing services don't work very

Hi All, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements.Following is the comparison result samba 3.6.8 + samba4.1.3. Following number is robocopy 2 flow result. 3.6.8 Read/Write (speed MB/sec) : 210/*202* 4.1 Read/Write: (speed MB/sec) : 220/*192* In case of read am getting better throughput for samba 4.1 but write always less. How can i improve the write throughput? Am not

Hi all. I'm trying to install Samba 4.2.0 on a Solaris 64 bit Unix server by doing the following but the configure script fails with "Couldn't determine size of 'bool'", any ideas ? :- # gunzip samba-latest.tar.gz # tar -xvf samba-latest.tar # cd samba-4.2.0 # ./configure ... ... Checking for blksize_t : ok Checking for blkcnt_t

Hi Folk, I am writing a Samba VFS module. The VFS CLOSE operation takes a longer time, much greater than 20s, to return. Looks this will cause Samba client server communication timeout. And Samba will load a new module, which is not what I want. I want Samba to wait, until VFS CLOSE operation finishes what it should do. I don't want Samba to load a new module. Can anyone tell me how/where to

Hello All, I am currently having an issue with my samba PDC. I have recently updated to 3.6.5 Samba, and have made what i believe to be the correct changes in my config to account for the changes to the idmap system. My setup is as follows, SAMBA PDC on RHEL 6.2, which authenticates passwords through Kerberos, and Deals with user profiles via LDAP. I had about 25 Windows clients which were able

Hello list, I am looking to enable samba aio on my Wheezy test box (I have version 4.1.17 from back ports). The output of smbd -b shows that the stable packages for my distro are not compiled using --with-aio-support. It appears that without recompiling I can use vfs objects = aio_pthread to achieve a similar effect? I'm aware that this somewhat dips into Debian specifics, but I figured

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:01:34PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > The symptom is that the windows process which is accessing the samba share > hangs > Also, if you try to open the same share (you can do the connection) to see > the files, the ls command hangs > > The other samba shares don't be affected at all, they work ok > > So the only thing you can do is a

I added debuging as follows: /* no O_EXCL, existence check is via the fcntl lock */ lockfile_fd = open(lockfile_name.buf, O_NONBLOCK|O_CREAT|O_WRONLY, 0644); if (lockfile_fd == -1) { ret = errno; DEBUG(1, ("%s: open failed: %s\n", __func__, strerror(errno))); return ret; }

Hi, I?ve added an existing group (?2d3d?) to an existing user (?jschopp?) on our AD server. When I execute ?id jschopp? the new group membership is not reflected: # id jschopp uid=1333(jschopp) gid=2020(dom?nen-benutzer) groups=2020(dom?nen-benutzer),610(BUILTIN+users) This is a strange behavior. Is this a caching issue? Kind regards, Martin AD: Windows Server 2008 RC2 with Windows Services

I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where I'm confident in the answer, so I figure I'd just ask again here if that's ok. Here's what we have, and what we'd like to do: Storage is a Netapp (cluster mode CDOT 8.2 I believe), it's NFS exported to our linux system. Linux system is CentOS 6 and can NFS mount the

Hi Ralph, Thanks for your suggestion. I have upgraded to Samba 4.1.14 (I know it's not the latest version but its the only version I could install on Gentoo at the moment). Unfortunately, my issues still persist. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # smbclient -V Version 4.1.14 # smbtree -U AJames Enter AJames's password: WORKGROUP

Hi Everyone, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements (SMB2.1 / SMB3.0). My experimental samba server hardware is running 4.1 version. Want to improve robocopy WRITE throughput from a two samba client machines (win7 or win8 or server2012 x86 servers). Someone please advice me how can I use SMB2.1 or SMB3.0 capabilities to improve WRITE throughput. I tried samba4.1

We are migrating all of our users from the current domain to a new one we created. In this process we are moving them from roaming profiles to local. What would be the best practice to accomplish this? I can find plenty of writeups on how to do the opposite. Also we will be doing some extra folder redirection. Currently we only redirect their my documents to the server. On the new system we plan