Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "lost rfc2307 settings in AD Manager."
2014 May 02
1
small question howto get the OU Layout ( base )
Hai,
?
Just a small question, how can i get the OU layout of the base with samba-tool or other tool.
I tried a lot but im not finding it.
or any other way is also ok, as long is i dont need to login on windows ;-)
?
my closeds was :? cat /etc/krb5.conf | grep default_realm | cut -d= -f2
but that places a space in front and im not a scripting king?:-/
?
What i need is the output like.
?
2017 Aug 02
1
Bulk add users and rfc2307 attributes questions
Hi Rowland,
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2017 23:23:25 -0400 (EDT)
> Tom Diehl via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently testing a self compiled 4.7.0rc3 AD DC and a samba
>> member server acting as a file server. I have them configured to use
>> rfc2307 attributes so that the samba
2020 Jul 20
3
Migrate mail aliases to AD ypServ30
How could I migrate these fields to CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=local?
dn: cn=abuse,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local
cn: abuse
objectClass: nisMailAlias
objectClass: top
rfc822MailMember: root
dn: cn=noc,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local
cn: noc
objectClass: nisMailAlias
objectClass: top
rfc822MailMember: root
dn: cn=security,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local
cn:
2020 Jul 20
2
Migrate mail aliases to AD ypServ30
Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:56:57 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> On 20/07/2020 11:11, RhineDevil via samba wrote:
> > How could I migrate these fields to CN=aliases,CN=mail,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=local?
> >
> > dn: cn=abuse,ou=Aliases,DC=mydomail,DC=local
> > cn: abuse
> > objectClass: nisMailAlias
> > objectClass:
2023 Nov 25
2
Switching to a RFC2307 Schema
Hello,
after stumbling in almost every thread, that it makes sense to have
RFC2307 enabled, I wanted to switch an AD DC to it and follwed this wiki
page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_RFC2307_in_AD
When I try to import the modified ldif file, I get an error message:
ERR: (Entry already exists) "Entry
CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,DC=ad,DC=url,DC=de already exists"
2023 Nov 25
1
Switching to a RFC2307 Schema
On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 18:58:02 +0100
mail--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after stumbling in almost every thread, that it makes sense to have
> RFC2307 enabled, I wanted to switch an AD DC to it and follwed this
> wiki page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_RFC2307_in_AD
>
> When I try to import the modified ldif file, I get an
2023 Nov 26
1
Switching to a RFC2307 Schema
On 25.11.2023 19:11:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 18:58:02 +0100
> mail--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > after stumbling in almost every thread, that it makes sense to have
> > RFC2307 enabled, I wanted to switch an AD DC to it and follwed this
> > wiki page
2018 Jan 16
3
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
Mandi! Kacper Wirski via samba
In chel di` si favelave...
> I understand the OP, I was asking some time ago similar question, but it was
> in relation to samba domain member.
Thanks, Kacper.
> I couldn't get backend: ad to work for
> machine accounts, so i switched to idmap: rid and it solved everything. I
> tried manually adding UID and GID to Domain Computer group and to
2023 Nov 26
1
Switching to a RFC2307 Schema
On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 15:30:19 +0100
mail--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 25.11.2023 19:11:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 18:58:02 +0100
> > mail--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > after stumbling in almost every thread, that it makes sense to
>
2018 Jan 15
1
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
Thank again for your help !
2018-01-12 21:26 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>:
> The problem is, you are thinking in the wrong direction ;-)
> If you give a user a uidNumber, or a group a gidNumber, these will be
> used instead of the xidNumbers found in idmap.ldb, you do not need to
> alter idmap.ldb at all.
> The way ADUC works, is by using a couple of
2018 Jan 15
2
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:18:57 +0100
Kacper Wirski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> I understand the OP, I was asking some time ago similar question, but
> it was in relation to samba domain member. I couldn't get backend: ad
> to work for machine accounts, so i switched to idmap: rid and it
> solved everything. I tried manually adding UID and GID to
2017 Aug 02
2
Bulk add users and rfc2307 attributes questions
Hi,
I am currently testing a self compiled 4.7.0rc3 AD DC and a samba member server
acting as a file server. I have them configured to use rfc2307 attributes
so that the samba users can access the shares on the member server. Everything
seems to be working as expected.
The problem I am facing is I need to add about 150 users. Once the initial
load of users is added I want to use the rsat tools
2019 Aug 19
2
Problems with NIS Server on Samba 4
Hi,
>Ah, I think I see the problem, If I remember correctly, you joined the
>the Samba DC to a Windows DC and if you didn't have IDMU installed on
>the Windows DC, you wouldn't get the required objects in AD created on
>the Samba DC either.
Really, IDMU was not installed.
There is the file ypServ30.ldif
ls /usr/share/samba/setup/
...
ypServ30.ldif
But, I believe the
2020 Oct 11
2
Naming violation: objectClass: myObjectClass not a valid child class for <>
Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote:
> > Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> >> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote:
> >>> Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif
> >>>
> >>> (I
2014 Jun 23
1
NIS extensions - only 3 of 55 entries present
I have a test setup of samba 4.1.6 under ubuntu 14.04.
When I do the query shown at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_RFC2307_on_a_Samba_DC#Check_if_NIS_Extensions_are_installed_in_your_Directory
it shows I have the ypServ30 container installed.
If I change this query to -s sub then I find 3 entries in that subtree
(see [1] below)
However the full schema in
2020 Jul 27
2
Naming violation: objectClass: myObjectClass not a valid child class for <>
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote:
> >
> > Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif
> >
> > (I used ldbadd instead of ldbmodify, is that a problem?)
>
> No, that isn't the problem, the problem is that I forgot to remove a
> comment :-(
>
>
2020 Nov 03
1
Get last uidNumber
Am 03.11.20 um 17:46 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
> On 03/11/2020 16:24, basti via samba wrote:
>> Hello,
>> is there a way to get the last uidNumber from ldap.
>>
>> I can do a ldapsearch like:
>>
>> ldapsearch -h samdom.example.com -D "administrator at samdom.example.com"
>> -w "changeit"? -b
2015 Apr 09
2
samba member logon.. question.
Greetings, Rowland Penny!
>>>>> Ok, good.
>>>>> Now, how can I get RFC2307 attributes populated automatically upon
>>>>> users or
>>>>> groups creation?
>>>> You can't :-(
>>>> I'm experimenting with
>>>> https://github.com/laotse/SambaPosix
>>>> but it's quite buggy (at least
2015 Apr 09
3
samba member logon.. question.
El 09/04/15 a les 16:20, Rowland Penny ha escrit:
> On 09/04/15 14:58, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>> El 09/04/15 a les 14:57, Andrey Repin ha escrit:
>>>> Using the RFC2307 attributes, you will get the same ID number on every
>>>> Unix machine, whereas if you use the 'rid' backend, whilst you should
>>>> get the same ID on each Unix machine, you will
2020 Sep 21
2
WERR_BAD_NET_RESP on replication
On 21/09/2020 15:00, Elias Pereira via samba wrote:
> Another doubt is about this bydefaults entry.
> The dc4 has this entry, but the dc3 does not. The dc3 is the fmso roles guy.
> Does it work that way or is there something wrong there?
Whilst there are a few attributes that do not replicate, all DN's should.
> * Comparing [DOMAIN] context...
>
> * DN lists have different