similar to: Samba 3.5 loses local master browser election to Win7 32bits

The 2023 X.Org Foundation elections are rapidly approaching. We will be forwarding the election schedule and nominating process to the membership shortly. Please note that only current members can vote in the upcoming election, and that the deadline for new memberships or renewals to vote in the upcoming election is 26 March 2023 at 23:59 UTC. If you are interested in joining the X.Org

Hello Community, i have a fileserver as domain member. today i found some weird log entries in log.nmbd: [2018/06/28 09:25:53.700507,  2] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_elections.c:41(send_election_dgram)   send_election_dgram: Sending election packet for workgroup DOMAINNAME on subnet 192.168.102.149 [2018/06/28 09:25:53.700618,  2] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_elections.c:41(send_election_dgram)  

I can force a browser election with the Win98 command: net view /workgroup:workgroupname However, that does not work on NT (and I haven't tried it on W95). What I'd really like is a command from the Linux command line to force the election. I've looked everywhere and can't find it. For my purposes having preferred master=yes and restarting Samba is not an option. Does anyone

Dear Samba-Users, I have to administer a Samba WINS Server in a heterogenous network. It's a student hostel with about 200 mixed (Windows, Linux, Mac OS X) computers. We have a DHCP, which delivers the WINS-Server address to the clients. I don't have access to the clients. The problem is, that the WINS-Server (Samba 3.0.27) looses the Master-Browser election irregulary. I can't

Dear all, Is there any R package which would help in analysing election results between two elections? Does anybody know any good papers which are related to this field? I am a statistician and my main research area so far has been regression and classification modelling. The analysis of two election results is new to me. Thanks in advance. Kind regards DK

Forced Election: In workgroup WORKGROUP when announced server was: SYSTEM-1 (192.168.1.248) : 50 Time(s) SYSTEM-2 (192.168.1.183) : 2 Time(s) SYSTEM-3 (192.168.1.248) : 1 Time(s) Cannot get workgroup name from domain name browser: 192.168.1.153 : 96 Time(s) 192.168.1.153 was a mac running Leopard. It has not been on the network for a month, but this keeps

Hi, A weird problem ... My PDC is running samba 3.0 cvs from a couple of weeks ago. the os level is set to 65 and that machine has been the master for my domain for ages, until last night. A win2k client machine stoll the domain and made itself the master for the domain, hence a few problems. I have cranked the os level to 80, however I'm pretty sure that is not supported/a bad idea/not to be

Hi all, I am running a v3.5.6 samba as a PDC with tbdsam. I have: security = user domain master = yes domain logons = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 33 log level = 1 My daily logwatch shows: Connections Denied: lib/util_sock.c:1432(get_peer_addr_internal) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint

Hi all, Today our domain went down. When looking in the log it appears that a windowsXPpro machine won the election. The domain controller has an OSlevel of 65 (3.0.14a). Restarting the smb process (/etc/init.d) resolved the problem. How is it possible that the XP machine was able to win the election ? After the election the XP machine (of course) failed to become the master browser. But why

Hi, I have a situation where in there are 2 switches A and B. port 0 of A is connected to port 0 of B port 1 of A is connected to port 1 of B all the four ports are in auto negotiation and 100mbps Last byte of MAC of A = 7F Last byte of MAC of B = 7E (remaining bytes of the MAC address are identical) Considering the switch B will be elected as root bridge which port of switch A will be root

Hello, I'm currently planning an environment which will survive any disaster like domain controller crash: PDC02 | VPN | switch | | PDC01 client01 PDC01 and PDC02 are domain controllers, and have identical smb.confs. client01 is a client, has WINS servers set to PDC01 and PDC02. users / passwords are replicated using LDAP. Now, under normal

Hello Samba; I am aware this was a problem years ago... This week I turned up a brand new server to replace an embarrassingly old one. The problem has re-occurred. I expected this to be a problem long ago fixed. I have made the following registry edit to the offending XP machine and restarted Samba. I hope it sticks. I have two questions: 1) Have I missed something in the configuration?

Hello Samba team ! On my network I have three Samba-4.1.17 domain controllers (Debian Jessie) : -> One PDC : pdc01 -> Two "slave" DC : sdc02, sdc03 I don't know why, but sometimes Samba receive the SIGTERM signal and restart even if I remove it from the logrotate configuration. On "pdc01" I see : ---------- pdc01 (log.samba) ---------- SIGTERM: killing children

Reposting from virt-tools mailing list: Hi! I'm facing a problem that could be triggered by some lacking of support from libvirt on Open vSwitch (or could be my mistake). I have interests in researching on virtual networks and SDN. To keep things simple, I've decided to use libvirt/virt-tools to manage VM's since my focus is on the network, instead of using a full feature system

2016-04-01 23:36 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 30/03/16 13:35, Prunk Dump wrote: >> >> Hello Samba team ! >> >> On my network I have three Samba-4.1.17 domain controllers (Debian Jessie) >> : >> -> One PDC : pdc01 >> -> Two "slave" DC : sdc02, sdc03 >> >> I don't know why, but sometimes Samba

Hi, I got the following setup. I got a openLDAP server. This server is the master server for LDAP functions. I named this ldapsrv. I got a samba server with openLDAP install on it as well. This LDAP server is the slave to ldapsrv. I named this sambasrv. The sambasrv currently have the following setup in /etc/smb.conf:- passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldapsrv.domain idmap backend =

>> >> Hello Samba team ! >> >> On my network I have three Samba-4.1.17 domain controllers (Debian Jessie) >> : >> -> One PDC : pdc01 >> -> Two "slave" DC : sdc02, sdc03 >> >> I don't know why, but sometimes Samba receive the SIGTERM signal and >> restart even if I remove it from the logrotate configuration. On >>

Hi All, I have a simple home network - no domain controller, no DNS, just DHCP on my router. I have simple samba file server built on Arch Linux, with single share exposed and couple of client computers, some ot them running Win7 x32 (embedded, not-upgradeable), some others with different Win or Linux systems. All of the client are connecting to the share using the same user/pwd, set up previously

We are seeking nominations for candidates for election to the X.Org Foundation Board of Directors. All X.Org Foundation members are eligible for election to the board. Nominations for the 2024 election are now open and will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 26 February 2024. The Board consists of directors elected from the membership. Each year, an election is held to bring the total number of

Hello All, As per the subject, we have recently joined a w2k3 domain folowing instructions on wiki as well as well as relying on valuble information on the list. The steps we took were the following: Join samba as secondary Created dns records by hand (ldbsearch, samba-tool dns add) Checked replication Copied sysvol Transferred some roles from windows Transferred some roles from samba (fsmo