similar to: Needs: i686 without pae (nonpae kernel)

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

Am 16.04.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: >> Is there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5? >> upgrading os to 6 is not option available. > > > Unfortunately not. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066914 -- LF

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

in fact: modgnutls provides easy way to get tlsv1.2 to rhel 5 -- Eero 2015-04-16 21:02 GMT+03:00 Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > well. this hack solution might work: > http://www.tuxad.de/blog/archives/2014/11/19/openssl_updatesenhancements_for_rhel__centos_5/index.html > > -- > Eero > > 2015-04-16 17:30 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster <leonfauster at

Am 16.06.2018 um 12:25 schrieb Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org>: > We have now set the mailing list to rewrite headers. That also has set > the From: of the email to the Mailing list and not the Original Author. > The author is moved to the CC: block and you can still easily see who > sent it and my email client (thunderbird) still does things the same way >

Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: > >> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that >> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to >> figure out what I need to do to get all the

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

In the hope that some skilled developers are here: We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found Is it possible to compile software (compile switch?) on a system that uses a newer glibc but in such a way that can be used (executed) on a system with an older glibc (like here: compiled on glibc 2.14 based system but C6 is on

Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > Any new information here? maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort. Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/spot/chromium/ thought ... --

Am 15.09.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>: > On 2015-09-15, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: >> >> Searching the web, I see very few possibilities to install a recent (I >> need gnome2) GNU/Linux distro on such hardware. I gave Linux MintPPC 11 >> (http://www.mintppc.org/content/list-macs) a try, but the netinstall

Am 25.08.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > 25.8.2015 4.03 ip. "Leon Fauster" <leonfauster at googlemail.com> kirjoitti: > >> >> In the hope that some skilled developers are here: >> >> We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 >> >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF

List, After updating to xen-hypervisor-3.1-1-i386 (version 3.1.2-1) my PAE dom0 kernel won't boot. The message I'm getting on boot indicates that the hypervisor isn't PAE. My dom0 kernel boots fine with the old 3.1 package and the binary PAE hypervisor distributed on xen.org. I've also downloaded the xen-hypervisor-3.1-1-i386-nopae package thinking maybe they got switch but I

Am 15.09.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>: > On 2015-09-15, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-15, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: >> >> this also helps to boot >> >> http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ > > rEFInd will work on EFI-based Macs, but not on old PPC

I'am running into this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206101 while trying to handcraft a kickstart file for CentOS7. Does anybody knowns a workaround? -- LF

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 >> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: >> >>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >>> officially patched? As far

On 2015-04-08, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 08.04.2015 um 16:22 schrieb Liam O'Toole > <liam.p.otoole at gmail.com>: >> On 2015-04-08, David Both >> <dboth at millennium-technology.com> >> wrote: >>> The easy way to restart gdm is when you are on the login screen >>> itself or the desktop simply press

> Am 25.05.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: > > I seem to be missing some important rpms, even when I enable the clearos-centos.repo which is suppose to include all of the centos rpms not customized by clearos. > > How can I check out if centos7-x64 has these missing rpms: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/ -- LF

Hi, i am seeing an unsigned package here: rpm -K http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/Packages/selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.3.noarch.rpm http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/Packages/selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.3.noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK i came across this while updating my systems. Just wondering if I am the first that stumbled over this? -- Thanks LF