similar to: Ifconfig ipv6:permission denied.

hello, the topology is like this: centos v0:eth1 <------> centos v0: eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 fc00:2:3::4 i turned the packet forwarding ping6 -i eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 the output is PING fc00:2:3:4::1(fc00:2:3:4::1) from fc00:2:3::5 eth2: 56 data bytes >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Administratively prohibited >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp_seq=2

Hello, Firstly THANK YOU for the IPv6 NAT support merged in 6.5. It has been almost impossible to get IPv6 into a VM on a laptop that switches between wifi and wired (dock) connections, because you can not add a wifi interface to a bridge. I know NAT is against the IPv6 end-to-end xen but it makes this "just work" for the vast majority of people like me who need to ssh/curl/talk to

Hi, I'd want to configure persistent static routes, ie in config files, but I can't configure static routes, I tested: [root at centos7 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/routes-enp0s3 ADDRESS0=10.10.10.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 logs says nothing: ago 27 15:38:29 centos7.vhgroup.corp NetworkManager[2299]: <info> Activation (enp0s3) Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4

hello, i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. i use a straight-through cable to connect centosv0:netcard-2 and centosv1:netcard2 the topology is this: client c(windows xp) <-->centosv0:netcard-3 <--> centosv0:netcard-2 <---> centosv1:netcard-2 <---->centosv1:netcard-2 <---> client d

I have encountered the error " SIOCSIFADDR: No such device" in one my Xen Guest (others VM are okay, and have checked they are using different mac address). Follow this link (http://blog.kabisa.nl/2009/12/11/xen-how-to-fix-siocsifaddr-no-such-device/) to remove the file "/etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules. " and didn''t help My guest VM is running Ubuntu

On 10/08/16 16:29, Levente Birta wrote: > And as I said this problem is resolved too ... I asked for another way > to achieve this When you add a default gateway with: route add default gw 192.168.1.1 dev enp3s0 you'll note that you now have 2 routes with the same metric of 0 (use route -n to see the metric field - couldn't get ip route to show me the metric). When using ip

drbd ctdb ocfs2 Hi Everything seems OK apart from the IP takeover. public_addresses 192.168.1.80/24 enp0s3 192.168.1.81/24 enp0s3 ctdb status Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 192.168.1.10 PARTIALLYONLINE pnn:1 192.168.1.11 PARTIALLYONLINE (THIS NODE) Generation:2090727463 Size:2 hash:0 lmaster:0 hash:1 lmaster:1 Recovery mode:NORMAL (0) Recovery master:1 but we are getting: 2014/07/11

2015-11-12 15:56 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de>: > On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as >> follows: >> >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own >> address as source address >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0:

Used steps on sysctl from?Centos7 FAQ (https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7)?and some gathered on internet # cat /etc/sysctl.d/90-disable_ipv6.conf? net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.eth0.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.eth1.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr=0 net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf=0 net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

Hi, I tried already a long time to enable network in my domU but I always fail with: # ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 up SIOCSIFADDR: No such device SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device Do I need to load a kernel module? I use OpenSuse 10.2 with kernel 2.6.18.8-0.5-xen (for both domU and dom0). My config: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-xen" ramdisk = "/home/jens/initrd.gz" memory = 1024 name

I have a bunch of Debian stretch machines with systemd where I find that tinc starts too early during boot, and fails to work. Typically it is running, but printing out Apr 14 00:53:41 db7 tinc[3077]: Can't write to Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) /dev/net/tun: Input/output error regularly. Unfortunately because it is running systemd does not restart it, even though it's not actually

Hi Marek I managed to setup everything in openwrt. However I am getting errors when trying to run tinc daemon. Below is my debug output. Please help.. How do I fix tunnel interface error? root at OpenWrt:/etc/tinc/vpn# tincd -n vpn -D -d3 tincd 1.0.21 (Mar 9 2014 18:26:59) starting, debug level 3 /dev/net/tun is a Linux ethertap device Executing script tinc-up ifconfig: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No

Hi Everybody! I'm configuring an IPv6-Only network, the OS i'm using is Debian Lenny 506 and the problem is that i cant put Samba 3.2 working. After configuring the entire system, when i try to join to the domain(net ads join -U Administrator), returns "Segmentation Fault". And with "net ads join -U Administrator -S FQDN_AD_Server" returns "Failed to join domain:

> On 03/09/2015 01:15 AM, Chris Stone wrote: >> >> sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0 On 03/10/2015 06:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > No change after running this and trying both: > > system network restart it's: service network restart Try also setting these in sysctl: net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1

I am installing a new Samba 4.2 Active Directory server on CentOS 7. I followed the Wiki instructions on how to create the server. I am using sernet-samba 4.2 binaries. Everything seems to be OK on the Linux side but I cannot get any windows client to successfully join the domain. Each attempt returns the following error message "RPC Server in not available". Below are the config file

2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier <jpeltier at sfu.ca>: > ----- Original Message ----- > | Hi, > | > | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as > | follows: > | > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own > | address as source address > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188 Bug ID: 1188 Summary: nft fails to parse own output; unable to save-restore active state Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nft

Hi Graham Can you perhaps share with me the mr-mips metarouter image you are using? Regards Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at hotmail.com> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Graham Cobb <g+tinc at cobb.uk.net> wrote: > On 19/01/16 03:57, Yazeed Fataar wrote: > > Hi Marek > > > > I managed to setup everything in openwrt. However I am getting errors > > when

On 8/10/20 11:23 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hello, > > Firstly THANK YOU for the IPv6 NAT support merged in 6.5. It has been > almost impossible to get IPv6 into a VM on a laptop that switches > between wifi and wired (dock) connections, because you can not add a > wifi interface to a bridge. I know NAT is against the IPv6 end-to-end > xen but it makes this "just