similar to: Could not resolve host: mirror.centos.org

I am trying to setup dynamic updates with bind_dlz backend, but for some reason if any windows client or linux with nsupdate tries to remove AAAA record, server just 'cancelling transaction', while A and PTR records (both on reverse ipv4 and ipv6) working fine. If i'am remove AAAA record manually via samba-tool or windows mmc then AAAA record can be updated, but after that it again

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind After #437891, I got yet another new "unexpected RCODE", this time "NOTIMP". As I was starting to get pissed off, I copied the whole list out of lib/dns/result.c, in an attempt to put an end to my headache. If you insist on using an enumeration instead of ".*",

I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS resolution is a little slow. I'm looking into why that is and tried an ns lookup for google.com and got the answer SERVFAIL on my AD server. The query was then passed to my next nameserver (google's own dns), which handled the query. Is this correct behaviour? I've not seen SERVFAIL before itadmin at

I think it?s the cache. When you where sleeping the cache got updated. But I can be wrong Philip > On 5 Sep 2020, at 12:35, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 05/09/2020 09:53, Peter Pollock via samba wrote: >> I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS >> resolution is a little slow. >> >>

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have set up Samba-3.0.11 to retrive account information from W2k server via winbind, and it works. But is takes about 10 sec. to retrive the information. I have dumped some traffic from the request, and it looks like this: A lot of these: 21:21:55.133423 172.20.3.131.1077 > 172.20.3.130.137: NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; UNICAST

I just set up a CentOS 5.2 system with bind9 (9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5) and I'm running up against a problem that seems to be related to SELinux. If I set named_disable_trans to 1, everything works as expected, but if I leave it enabled the server will only give me data for the zones for which it is authoritative. For external sites it returns a ServFail error. This is with nslookup and dig. If I

Hello, we encountered a problem with registry nic.at for tld .at and their transaction "BillWithDraw". This transaction allows an registrar to delegate authority back to registry. For a successful use of this transaction all nameserver-entries for the zone will be deleted by our application before nic-order will be sent to nic.at. Nic.at now checks all nameserver for existing

Sorry about the HTML in the last email - I'm attempting to resend (with fingers crossed that my mailer doesn't throw in a bunch of HTML this time...) ----> I've taken the good suggestions and made some progress getting a bind-dhcp-samba server running on the Pi with Raspbian Buster. Rowland wrote: > The best way would be to find whatever is rewriting /etc/resolv.conf >

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.8 Severity: normal After double checking that I had the most up to date logcheck-database :-) I am seeing these lines reported. May 17 15:29:33 localhost named[1765]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'software.majix.org/A/IN': 2001:503:ba3e::2:30#53 I believe that this line was intended to match it. ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11}

I'm getting a server failure for mirror.centos.org. Is anyone else having trouble? Nameserver trace for mirror.centos.org: * Looking for who is responsible for root zone and followed g.root-servers.net. * Looking for who is responsible for org and followed d0.org.afilias-nst.org. * Looking for who is responsible for centos.org and followed ns3.centos.org. * Looking for

The DNS for www.voip-info.org seems to be non-responsive. Is there a mirror of this invaluable resource site? Tx, Steve dig www.voip-info.org ;; Got SERVFAIL reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, trying next server ; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> www.voip-info.org ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 61402 ;;

Recently I'm getting these errors on my slave when adding new domains: Sep 26 13:48:27 hosting named[1668]: zone wholesaletvtime.com/IN: refresh: unexpected rcode (SERVFAIL) from master 207.218.174.4#53 The master/slave transfers work for the other 1000+ domains that I have, just not the handful of new ones that I just added after the CentOS 4.3 -> 4.4 upgrade. I regenerated the

Thank you everyone for your help. I corrected my resolv.conf files as Peter Milesson suggested and then had to take a number of extra steps so now things are looking a little better. In case it helps anyone else in the future, here's what I found (plus I am now having problems resolving internal addresses). As far as I can see, the setup on both servers is identical (except they use their own

Hi I'm sorry. I mailed the same question again. because, it cannot be yet solved. any ideas with asterisk? [Aug 20 14:40:12] WARNING[29315]: chan_sip.c:11806 check_auth: username mismatch, have <aaaa>, digest has aaaa at 192.168.0.1[Aug 20 14:40:12] NOTICE[29315]: chan_sip.c:20479 handle_request_register: Registration from 'aaaa <sip:aaaa at 192.168.0.1>' failed for

Hi All: For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig using itself as the resolver the queries fail (See below). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ed [root at qmail ~]# ps -aux | grep pdns-recursor Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a

Hello, I have dns zone domain.com configured on nsd server. If a try #dig axfr @localhost domain.com then i receive correct answer, but if i try #dig a @localhost domain.com then i received nothing but should be 127.0.0.1 How can i troubleshoot this problem? output: [root at ns1 ~]# dig axfr @localhost domain.com ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1-RedHat-9.8.3-2.P1.fc15 <<>> axfr

There seems to be an issue with DNS: > nslookup llvm.org ;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 192.168.178.1, trying next server Server: 192.168.178.1 Address: 192.168.178.1#53 ** server can't find llvm.org: NXDOMAIN -- AlexDenisov Software Engineer, https://lowlevelbits.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

(please reply to the list) If the record does not exist, then you have an other problem. Because samba does support this : cat /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf.update /* this file is auto-generated - do not edit */ update-policy { grant INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; grant Administrator at INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A AAAA SRV CNAME; grant