similar to: EPEL-7 is Released

Once upon a time, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> said: > On 6/22/2016 10:47 AM, Digimer wrote: > >This is called "fabric fencing" and was originally the only supported > >option in the very early days of HA. It has fallen out of favour for > >several reasons, but it does still work fine. The main issues is that it > >leaves the node in an unclean

Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU.

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote: > Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence > (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start > floating IP. My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in the head. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45?38' N, 122?6' W

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Digimer wrote: > The nodes are not important, the hosted services are. The only time this isn't true is when you're using the node to heat the room. Otherwise, the service is always the important thing. (The node may become as synonymous with the service because there's no redundancy, but that's a bug, not a feature.) -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at

Anyone ever implimented cfengine on 4.x ? I am just looking for background and if there are any traps to fall into? thanks

On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>

Is anyone working with cfengine v3? It looks like it has some interesting design changes and a commercially supported windows version now. Can anyone share real-world experiences? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was

Just wondering if anyone out there is using sudo across a bunch of machines and has a system/script for painlessly distributing a master sudoers file? is it as easy as a daily cronjob running wget/scp/rsync?

hi everyone, I know this update has been a bit delayed, things have been pretty hectic. But lots of good updates for everyone: Distro -------- * Updates for CentOS Linux 5/7 : All updates from upstream are released into the CentOS mirror network. * Upstream 6.7 was released a few days back, we have all the rpms from that release built and released to the early-adopters into the CentOS-CR repos

Hey folks, I have a problem with the definition of a variable of type slist in CFEngine on # uname -a ; cat /etc/redhat-release Linux policyhub.example.com 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 22 21:09:27 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) I'm not sure if its valid to ask CFEngine questions on this mailing list, but as far as I'm running on

On 12/05/16 10:21, James Hogarth wrote: > On 12 May 2016 at 08:22, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator < > goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we see a growing need for a better Configuration management for our >> servers. >> >> Are there any known good resources for a comparison of e.g. Puppet, >> Chef, Ansible etc?

On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking > > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the > > same issue as I describe below? > > > >

Hello, I have a home setup where I am using Centos 4.4 as a sort of mail server. This is what I have done. I have it configured to pop mail locally. I have fetchmail configured to dl from my provider my families mail through a cron job and .fetchmailrc in their home directories. They then pop the server to retrieve their mail. They send their mail directly through the provider. I have

Dear Experts, I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage cluster, or as a distributed filesystem. I made my own research of what I can do, but I hit a snag with my seemingly best choice, so I decided to stay away from it finally, and ask clever people what they would use. My requirements are: 1. I would like to have one big (say, comparable to petabyte)

Redhat in centos? I type help and the first line says redhat. Are we paranoid about red..t? Clayton You can tell the caliber of a man by his gun--c. kirkwood

Hi all, I'm happy to announce a new tutorial! https://alteeve.com/w/2-Node_Red_Hat_KVM_Cluster_Tutorial This tutorial walks a user through the entire process of building a 2-Node cluster for making KVM virtual machines highly available. It uses Red Hat Cluster services v3 and DRBD 8.3.12. It is written such that you can use entirely free or fully Red Hat supported environments.

Hi all, I'm happy to announce a new tutorial! https://alteeve.com/w/2-Node_Red_Hat_KVM_Cluster_Tutorial This tutorial walks a user through the entire process of building a 2-Node cluster for making KVM virtual machines highly available. It uses Red Hat Cluster services v3 and DRBD 8.3.12. It is written such that you can use entirely free or fully Red Hat supported environments.

On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote: > On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote: >> So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be >> updated. >> > > Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate > copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs page, I'll > continue perusing and referring to the RHEL 6