similar to: Centos 7 and Network/Bridges

Hi *.*, This is a continuation on the 2 NICs thread after some more testing. Just to remember my goal. --------------------------- I want to create a domU with 2 virtual NICS. One of them will contact the outside world, the other one will contact a VPN. No reason in concrete for choosing the bridging protocol, only because its the default one. I installed the dom0 with the 2 NICs active, with

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN

dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet

Hi All, I have 2 NICS in this system. CentOS 6.4 eth0 is the virtual IP from PFSense mapping connected to the router, works fine. eth1 is a second NIC that I have assigned a private IP to and connected it to a switch on the private network. I have many other private devices, so I know this setup works. When I connect the cable to the switch and bring up eth1 the system basically stops taking

2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier <jpeltier at sfu.ca>: > ----- Original Message ----- > | Hi, > | > | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as > | follows: > | > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own > | address as source address > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received

On my CentOS 6 partition of my laptop: First note that for this test, NetworkManager is not running because I did: chkconfig --del NetworkManager and then rebooted. Here is my ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT=no HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.2.5 PREFIX=24 GATEWAY=192.168.2.1 DNS1=192.168.2.1 DNS2=192.168.2.1

Hello, I want my CentOS 6.5 computer to have a static IP. Currently I get the IP I want because I have my router assign it on the basis of mac address. I placed the following file as: /etc/sysconfig/networking-scripts/eth0 DEVICE="eth0" BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:1F:D0:9E:AE:67 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no IPV6INIT=no PEERDNS=yes NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IPADDR=192.168.0.99

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

Hi, I accidentally found that the existence of a file e.g. named ifcfg-eth1:1 put in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ leads to the appropriate interface being created even with the option 'ONBOOT' set to 'no': DEVICE="eth1:1" BOOTPROTO="static" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT="no" TYPE="Ethernet" IPADDR=12.34.56.78

CentOS-5.5 # uname -a Linux inet05.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 17:52:25 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Can anyone tell me why I am seeing these error message? Specifically, why is TYPE=Bridge giving Unknown connection type 'Bridge'? Jan 13 08:25:31 inet05 nm-system-settings: Loaded plugin ifcfg-rh: (c) 2007 - 2008 Red Hat, Inc. To report bugs

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/13/2017 07:35 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's >> wonderful. > > What's in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-<interface>? Does it say > NM_CONTROLLED=no? > Good catch. No, it doesn't say no... because the line was commented out. I've just uncommented it,

Hi all, we are testing CentOS 7 in order to migrate from Scientific Linux 6 / CentOS 6 and we are facing an issue with the network. Trying to configure network with teaming in activebackup mode or also with bonding in mode=1 (active backup as well) we see many RX dropped packets in the bond0 interface (around 10% of the total), 100% RX drops in the backup interface and 0% in the active interface.

Hello CentOS gurus, and a belated Happy New Year (or an early Happy Chinese New Year). I'm in the process of building a CentOS-6 KVM host machine whose only function will be to run four independent 'm0n0wall' firewall guest instances. I have a couple of quad-port Intel NICs to provide four WAN-side and four LAN-side ports, which will not be shared with any other guests. Remote

Weird behaviour. A couple of days ago I installed another DSL router. During the process I have somehow caused the default gw route to disappear - on system start up the interface comes up fine, I can see and connect to the local subnet but not to the internet. [rkampen at timsws network-scripts]$ route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref

took a couple months off due to road blocks, hoping a fresh look would allow me to use my server as desired. I have three ports, eth0-2 over two nics. I want to bond them, and then use a bridge to connect to virtual machines on the virtual host computer. Never having done this, I am confused on some parts. Here is where I am at now and any pointers helpful. Single server, centos 6.x My issue

CentOS-6.6 We have a host that has multiple IPv4 addresses aliased to eth0. The primary address is 216.185.71.x and the alias is 192.168.6.x. This host connects to devices on both netblocks without problems. Only default routing is used and it looks like this: #ip route 192.168.6.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.6.x 216.185.71.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src

I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config. I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect anything. ifcfg-eth0: GATEWAY=192.168.1.254 IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=no BROADCAST=192.168.1.255 BOOTPROTO=none NAME="" NM_CONTROLLED=yes MACADDR="" TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth0 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 MTU="1500"

Just FYI: I had several problems to install CentOS 7 with 512 MB RAM. No log showed me that problem (I would expect a system check before). With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ... Best Regards Oli -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

hello, i am new to lxc, i have created a lxc container on fedora 19 i created a container rootfs of fedora 19 by using yum --installroot=/containers/test1 --releasever=19 install openssh test1.xml file for container test1 <domain type="lxc"> <name>test1</name> <vcpu placement="static">1</vcpu> <cputune>