similar to: abrt relevance?

Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the time) fail to start, and the abrt report indicates a signal 11 (SIGSEGV). I don't see any other reports of this. Is no one using Thunderbird these days? Do abrt reports

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote: >> Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install >> of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than >> installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the >> time) fail

Hi All, I've been tuning a server recently and just today this has started to appear in my top/htop output. [root at db1 ~]# ps -aux | grep kernel root 1011 0.0 0.0 212048 4532 ? Ss 13:34 0:00 /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING: at WARNING: CPU: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ernel BUG at list_del corruption list_add corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear stack overflow

When using nbdsh for scripting, it is convenient to let nbdsh fail with status 1 when encountering an API failure. However, doing so by letting the nbd.Error exception leak all the way causes ABRT (on Fedora 32 at least) to assume the program crashed from a programming error, and needlessly complicates clients to have to add try: blocks. Better is if nbdsh itself prints the same stack trace that

Hi sbr-services, Could you give me some idea? ### abrt reported the error as below. [root at cupop4 log]# abrt-cli list --since 1488267244 id ad716dbfd3a68bbe0f055e32ebfe562f4f75df43 reason: imap killed by SIGBUS time: Sun Mar 19 2017 10:58:27 AM JST cmdline: dovecot/imap package: dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7 uid: 80180 (acaa2325) count: 2 Directory:

On Sunday, I did a "yum update" which installed kernel 2.6.32-573.3.1.el6.i686 on half a dozen virtual machines running CentOS 6.7. Since then, two of them have gone into "meltdown", and started spewing "ABRT Daemon" emails: one on Tuesday, and one tonight. The machines have a very light workload -- one runs "trac", and a handful of development systems,

Greetings - I have a Centos 6 box fully updated that intermittently sends me an "[abrt] full crash report" email. I am not familiar with these at all and in my limited google search have not found good information to interpret this information. The most recent (and the most frequent one) is listed below, also I have listed the lines from /var/log/messages that correspond to

There is a program that starts up abrt-dump-oops. What controls that starting up? It does not seem to be a "service" Thanks, Jerry

Hello, centos 7(1) I have a question about abrt-auto-reporting? should this work normal ? I have on my System Problems to report the Errors. Thanks for a answer, -- mit freundlichen Gr?ssen / best regards, G?nther J. Niederwimmer

The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few changes for branding/artwork as we can. That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available, therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg

Hi, I am running C6.5 64bit on an USB stick connected to a HP DL360G7; It is usually an ESXi host but eg for firmware updates (not available on SPP) I use this local installation. Problem are the lags and unresponsiveness we are seeing for example when running yum update in the installation phase. The whole system stalls but there is no io in vmstat. From what google tells us, this is a

Hi, hopping everyone is fine. I am using a Centos 7 server based on Nginx. I am using the server for providing downloadable data. Around 8 TB per day is downloaded. The server was working fine and perfectly. I hired a freelancer to limit the download speed as i am unexperienced with linux (Worst Mistake Ever) he messed up the server and after 4 hours said he cant impletement a simple

hello, while upgrading a kvm virtualization cluster from c6.4 to c6.5 and i am no longer able to control the migration speed. in c6.4 the default speed was the maximum bandwidth (1g in my case) and the actual migration speed was about 100MB/s. now in c6.5 the actual migration speed dropped down to about 25MB/s - 50MB/s, it varies and sometimes during migration of huge machines (36GB) i was at

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0215 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0215.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 99851e81e7cac7d406e9931753af92833ecc58fdcf5e328e715334382e169337 abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1289 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1289.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b201d09a7b2122d998fcf5aeeac00c57adc238968c89fe705e5f6b65efc5c86d abrt-2.0.8-16.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm

ABRT is a collection of scripts that makes it easier to report bugs and crashes in various components of the distribution to a central server. Metadata from this allows developers and upstream projects to evaluate their priority chain, and also get crucial information on why their software might not be performing as expected on CentOS Linux. This information is sent to the server in a json format

Hello all One of my VMs, running RHEL 7, has been giving me the following ABRT error when I try to login as su Ive seen this error the past three times that Ive logged in. I know that the VM is using Red Hat,but seeing that RHEL/CentOS are pretty much the same thing, I figured I should ask the CentOS mailing list for help. Here is the error: $ su Password: ABRT has detected 1 problem(s). For

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0841 Low Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0841.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a761ddbf659067983214235c2729f1247efa178eeb6f9ca87d2dc463afea3c71 abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1083 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1083.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4b27d42a4ed792b8cc8729cc65e6d70a82225000bbad1aa0f002a05582679de2 abrt-2.1.11-22.el7.centos.0.1.x86_64.rpm

On 02/09/2015 09:34 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 02/06/2015 07:56 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> Does anyone know why this is not available in CentOS 6.6. I found it in >> a SL repo but not in CentOS. > I opened http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8183 last Friday (Feb 6). > You can also use the one in the C6.5-updates vault repository. > Thanks!