similar to: Roadmap for C7-i386 and -arm?

[CCing the libguestfs mailing list - as Rich responded on IRC about your question on timeout.] On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Thomas Kee <xsited@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Kashyap, > > Thanks for offering to help. The day job caused a pause and it took me an > hour to reassert where I was in the process. I usually hang out on freenet > as xsited. I am still reading the

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 08/09/2017 10:44 PM, mad.scientist.at.large at tutanota.com wrote: >> what file system are you using? ssd drives have different >> characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow >> write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and >> never, never put a swap partition on it, the high activity will

On 03/02/2017 08:53 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> I want to image the drive at various 'checkpoints' so I can go back and redo from a particular point? >> what dd params work? >> >> dd if=/dev/sdb of=os.img bs=1M count=3210 > That looks plausible. (I haven?t verified your count

I have been working, for the past few years, with armv7 SOCs and have a number of servers working. Intel, etal are catching up with ARM and I have seen ones like: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/NEW-Mini-pc-X86-4-Lan-Qotom-Q190G4N-with-celeron-J1900-quad-core-4-usb-VGA/32785346279.html I am looking for a low power (this is 10W) x86_64 board that has at least 2 core and 2GB memory. A single

If it had two (or more) network ports, I'd be all over it. A single gigabit nic is a bit limiting for me. On 05/17/2017 01:04 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > I have this and happy with it, I believe it ticks all your boxes (+ built-in IR port). > > http://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/nuc/nuc-kit-dn2820fykh.html > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg

On 12/27/2016 02:58 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Robert, > > On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 12:43 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> My understanding (most likely flawed) is that Indexes are needed to see >> the list of files in mydir, > Correct. > >> and to be able to walk down to subdir. > Incorrect. The index is a convenience. Without it directories with

On 12/27/2016 05:44 PM, John Fawcett wrote: > On 12/27/2016 11:02 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> On 12/27/2016 02:58 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >>> Hello Robert, >>> >>> On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 12:43 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> My understanding (most likely flawed) is that Indexes are needed to see >>>> the list of

On 04/20/2017 05:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. > I think it?s more the case that CentOS is written with the assumption that you?re running it on a host with a battery-backed RTC, so that system time

On 12/27/2016 11:02 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 12/27/2016 02:58 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >> Hello Robert, >> >> On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 12:43 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> My understanding (most likely flawed) is that Indexes are needed to see >>> the list of files in mydir, >> Correct. >> >>> and to be able

On 03/21/2017 11:50 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/21/2017 5:02 AM, ken wrote: >>> >> Those have worked for me as well. Their range, however, is a third >> or half as much as a normal wifi device. >> > > in general, the back of a server, buried under all the cables, and > right up against the metal box is a lousy place for an RF antenna... > My

On 08/10/2017 10:31 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> On 08/09/2017 10:44 PM, mad.scientist.at.large at tutanota.com wrote: >>> what file system are you using? ssd drives have different >>> characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow >>> write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and

On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 04/20/2017 05:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >>> So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. >> I think it?s more the case that CentOS is

On 08/09/2017 10:44 PM, mad.scientist.at.large at tutanota.com wrote: > what file system are you using? ssd drives have different characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and never, never put a swap partition on it, the high activity will wear it out rather quickly. might also check cables, often a

Hi, I have this and happy with it, I believe it ticks all your boxes (+ built-in IR port). http://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/nuc/nuc-kit-dn2820fykh.html -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Moskowitz" <rgm at htt-consult.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at

Thanks, Nux!. But a few hours late. I just purchased: http://www.ebay.com/itm/ZOTAC-ZBOX-NANO-Plus-Mini-PC-ZBOXNANO-AD12-PLUS-2GB-320GB-with-Power-Supply-56/382042194064?_trksid=p2045573.c100033.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D41376%26meid%3Deae770f22d504a9b8366eb0c02dd20d6%26pid%3D100033%26rk%3D7%26rkt%3D8%26sd%3D152356229748 Zotac has been in the mini/nano

On May 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> writes: > >>> - How difficult do you expect a backport to 3.1 to be? We have to work >>> from 3.1. Trunk is too buggy. > >> You've stated that trunk is too buggy for you to work from on multiple >> occasions. Can you elaborate? That doesn't match my

I am pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 (1611) for armhfp compatible machines. This is the current release for CentOS Linux 7 and is tagged as 1611, derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 == Download You can download new images for armhfp boards on http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/armhfp/ Images and sha256sums :

On 3/3/2017 5:34 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Well, I only wanted to copy the used part of the drive which I try to > keep small so I can still copy the image to an mSD card if I wish. So > I have to supply the amount of the drive to copy. The bs=512 went > fast enough, but then I was only copying 3.2GB. > > thanks for the help. personally, I would use 'dump' for

I am building a mailserver and with all the steps, I want to image the drive at various 'checkpoints' so I can go back and redo from a particular point. The image is currently only 4GB on a 120GB drive. Fdisk reports: Disk /dev/sdb: 111.8 GiB, 120034124288 bytes, 234441649 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size

thanks for the reply. On 08/23/2015 01:26 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 23/08/15 17:10, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> After years of delays and side trips, I really am going to dive in >> and build my own Samba server. And I have a few questions. >> >> All of my servers will be ARM. The main hardware will be Cubieboards >> (2 and truck). They will be running