similar to: Miredo server for Centos 6

Is the Miredo server available for Centos? A quick check of 'yum install miredo*" came up empty. I have miredo for Fedora 20, but I want the server to be Centos... thank you.

I am bringing up a Miredo server and relay on my new iPv6 network. I have been reading the RFC and the man pages. One of the many vague points is the udp port used by the Miredo client in relay mode. Is it 'random' or is it 3545? How do I find out what it is? Plus how do I set up my server so that the Miredo server and client relay start as part of the system boot? They do now work

I found a src.rpm for 1.1.5-1 for fc8 (not rh8!). I was able to rebuild it on my Centos build system. The rpms are identified as 1.1.5-1.i386.rpm, no el5 or other identification was placed in the files. I don't see how to control this when you rebuild from an existing src.rpm. Interestingly the fc8 designation was lost. I also rebuild it on my fc10 system. It worked, and the rpms have

Miredo is run as a server from the command line: /usr/sbin/miredo The man page says the signal SIGTERM stops the server. How do I send SIGTERM to the server? Or SIGHUP, as I want to make a change to the config file. And once I get this as I want it, how do I run it at system boot?

I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5 (http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en) I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from: http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/, and have the miredo source in ~/build/miredo-1.1.5. I run ./configure (as the INSTALL text file tells me to do) and get the error: checking for Judy.h usablity... no checking for Judy.h presence... no checking for Judy.h...

I built rpms for Miredo 1.1.5-1 on Centos 5.2 from the fc8 rpms. How do I determine if I have to rebuild it for Centos 5.3?

Dear CentOS Gurus I have been using "repoforge.org" primarily to obtain two RPMs, "lshw" and "flash-plugin". I recently realized that "repoforge.org" should not be used, as it has had no updates for a long long time. But, when I search for the RPMs within the repos: base centosplus contrib epel extras updates the lshw program is nowhere to

On 04/16/2014 05:33 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have > conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging. Does the use of yum priorities take care of this concern? Thanks, Ken

On 9/30/2015 8:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/30/2015 5:11 PM, Kommander Mighty Aura wrote: >> Hello. I have been trying to add rpmforge as a repository, but yum does >> not seem to be updating the package lists. I tried... > > rpmforge is a dead repo, no longer maintained, I would not use for > anything anymore. rpmforge was renamed to repoforge, although they

I am running multiple IPv6 subnets here in my testbed. My IPv6 'router' is a Centos box with IPv6forwarding turned on. It is also my RADVD server (over multiple VLans), and Miredo server/relay. I thought I had a simple ip6table setup that protected the box and let it forward. Well I am wrong. I got my previous DNS over IPv6 working on the DNS server, then tried to get it working

Hi! I am trying to to ask the packagers from repoforge for updated packages of ganglia and rrdtool and i got no answer on their mail list.. Does anyone have idea if repoforge is still active? Thanks! Adrian

I'm testing Dovecot as a possible replacement for UW. In my environment the home directories are automounted via NFS from a NetApp. In general this works fine, but Dovecot isn't picking up the automounted directories. Consider the case of Arthur Dent, test user: May 12 10:30:24 testbed dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.info] imap-login: Login: user=<adent>, method=PLAIN,

Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:

Hi folks, I hope this is the right mailing list to ask since on the repoforge website there is no list or contact information. I have a problem with updating the perl-Nagios-Plugin package. I have installed perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-1.el6.rf.noarch, and running yum update leads to: > Error: Package: perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.35-1.el6.rf.noarch (rpmforge) > Requires:

Hello. I have been trying to add rpmforge as a repository, but yum does not seem to be updating the package lists. I tried $ yum check-updates [...] Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: <mirror> * epel: <mirror> * extras: <mirror> * rpmforge: mirror.ate.info * updates: <mirror> and searched for any package available there, like i3 and mpv. It is still like

Hey, I ran into a yum conflict regarding an repoforge extra package obsoleting a base package. The thing is that I set a lower priority to repoforge extra... Any idea how come I ran into this issue...? The question is more about the yum priorities than repoforge. ... 1743 packages excluded due to repository priority protections ... --> Running transaction check ---> Package

On 6/5/2015 10:44 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > Shortly after installing, I got a pop-up > notice that security updates wre available. > On doing yum update, I got error messages: > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge) > Requires: libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) > Removing:

I am trying to make and install a version of llvm that I check out of cvs last night. When I configured LLVM, I set the prefix to a directory inside my home directory. However, when I did a make install I got the following errors: llvm[3]: Installing Debug Bytecode Archive /lib/libc.a /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/lib/libc.a': Permission denied make[3]: ***

When did they change/lose their name? I was trying to go there here at work, and the site was blocked. I put in a ticket, and get a response that I may have been looking for repoforge, and rpmforge is for raw food diets.... mark

Hey, any puppet user on CentOS 5 using puppet lab's repository...? I installed their el5 repository but a puppet install asks for: ruby >= 1.8.7 which is only available on CentOS 6... Someone using their repo? Or do you use the repoforge one...? Thx, JD