similar to: Google Hangout Plugin Does Not Work For Other Users

Hey Bax, Thank you for the help. I've got a 32 bit system so this is the path I needed. If you have a 64 bit system use the link below this one. https://dl.google.com/linux/talkplugin/rpm/stable/i386/google-talkplugin-5.4.2.0-1.i386.rpm -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] google talk plugin for google hangout not loading Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 01:02:02 +0100 From:

Hey All, I found another issue with 6.6 that was working with 6.5. Error: Package: google-talkplugin-5.38.5.0-1.i386 (/google-talkplugin_current_i386) Requires: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****

Hey james and JMW: Can/Should we schedule a google hangout where james spins up a puppet-gluster based gluster deployment on fedora from scratch? Would love to see it in action (and possibly steal it for our own vagrant recipes). To speed this along: Assuming James is in England here , correct me if im wrong, but if so ~ Let me propose a date: Tuesday at 12 EST (thats 5 PM in london - which i

Hi all, just wanted to let you know that there''s a community event going on in Kuala Lumpur right now, currently there''s a talk on OpenShift, and at noon (GMT+8) one of our guys will do a session on Puppet+AWS. It''s being recorded by Google Hangout on Air, so even if you''re late you can watch it for free.

Hey All, [root at peach RPM_REPO]# yum install google-talkplugin_current_x86_64.rpm Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Install Process Examining google-talkplugin_current_x86_64.rpm: google-talkplugin-5.40.2.0-1.x86_64 Marking google-talkplugin_current_x86_64.rpm to be installed Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.mbni.med.umich.edu *

Hello All, this problem occured both before the release with CR repo and now after the release. I have 150 laptops running Centos7 / MATe, including my own laptop. We have these repo's enabled: repo id repo naam status base/7/x86_64 CentOS-7 - Base 9.591 beid-release/7 Belgian eID package archive 68 epel/x86_64 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64 11.904 extras/7/x86_64

> Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 05:34:11 -0500 > From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> > > On 09/15/2017 03:06 AM, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> this problem occured both before the release with CR repo and now >> after the release. I have 150 laptops running Centos7 / MATe, >> including my own laptop. >>

Dear list, At the RISC-V BoF at the LLVM Dev Meeting and the longer working session the day after, those of us working on RISC-V with LLVM decided it would be worthwhile to schedule regular sync-up calls in order to better co-ordinate ongoing work between different developers. This is primarily to sync-up, share blocking issues and so on. I understand something similar was done during the

On 14 November 2017 at 16:03, Alex Bradbury <asb at lowrisc.org> wrote: > Dear list, > > At the RISC-V BoF at the LLVM Dev Meeting and the longer working > session the day after, those of us working on RISC-V with LLVM decided > it would be worthwhile to schedule regular sync-up calls in order to > better co-ordinate ongoing work between different developers. This is >

On 07/12/15 16:17, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large > enterprise environment. It is usually blocked. > Does google hangout work ? we might be able to also setup a phone dial in setup -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

Hi, I think almost everybody did it once: you call the pbx, the pbx hangs out, it calls back using the caller id, you type the number you want to dial using dtmf and the pbx calls the number for you. Such a way you can make a completely free call. Of course you should implement CLI whitelists and passwords to enhance security. Unfortunately I don't use this function since several years, I

On 2002.10.19 19:44 Ruben I Safir wrote: NYLXS is having a watershed week this week and I'd like to personally extend my hope to everyone to participate and prosper from all of our activities. On Sunday, We are papering Long Island City and Astoria with Flyers for the Free Software Business Demo at LaGaurdia College. We are meeting at the front Entrance of the Queens Citicorp Building

On 23 November 2017 at 09:38, Alex Bradbury <asb at lowrisc.org> wrote: > On 14 November 2017 at 16:03, Alex Bradbury <asb at lowrisc.org> wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> At the RISC-V BoF at the LLVM Dev Meeting and the longer working >> session the day after, those of us working on RISC-V with LLVM decided >> it would be worthwhile to schedule regular

Thomas, Thank you for your interest in this, you description is as accurate as I can see. > From my perspective your challenges will be to get the containers right. > WebM for audio+video > Ogg for audio > > Also (I'm not that familiar with webRTC) you might need to reencode > to Opus and VP8 in some cases? here is the great news

On 09/15/2017 03:06 AM, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > Hello All, > > this problem occured both before the release with CR repo and now after the release. > I have 150 laptops running Centos7 / MATe, including my own laptop. > > We have these repo's enabled: > > repo id repo naam status > base/7/x86_64 CentOS-7 - Base 9.591 > beid-release/7

Hey all, So we have been advised from this thread https://github.com/muaz-khan/WebRTC-Experiment/issues/28#issuecomment-18385702 to not use http put as it is not in real-time, instead they are suggesting the use of SDP, is that something that icecast supports? Or does anyone have other ideas on this? ~stephen On Sun 12 May 2013 01:51:31 AM CDT, Thomas Ruecker wrote: > Hi, > > On 11

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Richard" <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Vrijdag 15 september 2017 13:03:27 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] libimoblidevice prevents updating to Centos7.4 > Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 05:34:11 -0500 > From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 08/20/2015 02:57 AM, Karsten Wade wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/03/2015 12:52 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 03/08/15 18:23, kunaal jain wrote: >> Is that possible to have an overview of the infra and goals (aka >> the architecture) of this GSoC doc project ? that would help >> understanding, as I agree that I'm

Hi, just a quick note that I found the CentOS board meeting minutes which state that the Virt SIG is moving forward. Consequently I updated * http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization * http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Proposal (& http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/march/centos-devel.2014-03-05-21.04.html) Apologies for the short notice. We are

Hello everyone, My name is Pratik Bhatu, I am a bachelor student currently studying at IIT Hyderabad, India.  I just finished my Compilers course have been exploring LLVM since the past month (kaleidoscope, writing LLVM passes) and am interested in the llvm-polly project. I am also a potential GSoC applicant and wanted to start working on the project from now. Is there a way I can