similar to: mdraid Q on c6...

Hi list, I'm new with UEFI and GPT. For several years I've used MBR partition table. I've installed my system on software raid1 (mdadm) using md0(sda1,sdb1) for swap, md1(sda2, sdb2) for /, md2 (sda3,sdb3) for /home. From several how-to concerning raid1 installation, I must put each partition on a different md devices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the

Hello everyone. I'm trying to install CentOS 8 with root and swap partitions on software raid. The plan is: - create md0 raid level 1 with 2 hard drives: /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, using Linux Rscue CD, - install CentOS 8 with Virtual Box on my laptop, - rsync CentOS 8 root partition on /dev/md0p1, - chroot in CentOS 8 root partition, - configure /etc/mdadm.conf, grub.cfg, initramfs, install

hi all! back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array. something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago, upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this, one for /dev/md0, one for /dev/md1, one for /dev/md125 and one for /dev/md126: Subject: DegradedArray

System is CentOS 6 all up to date, previously had two drives in MD RAID configuration. md0: sda1/sdb1, 20 GB, OS / Partition md1: sda2/sdb2, 1 TB, data mounted as /home Installed kmod ZFS via yum, reboot, zpool works fine. Backed up the /home data 2x, then stopped the sd[ab]2 partition with: mdadm --stop /dev/md1; mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sd[ab]1; Removed /home in /etc/fstab. Used

Is it possible or will there be any problems with using mdraid on top of mdraid? specifically say mdraid 1/5 on top of mdraid multipath. e.g. 4 storage machines exporting iSCSI targets via two different physical network switches then use multipath to create md block devices then use mdraid on these md block devices The purpose being the storage array surviving a physical network switch

Hi all, This morning I received this notification from mdadm: This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm running on server-mail.mydomain.kom A Fail event had been detected on md device /dev/md1. Faithfully yours, etc. In /proc/mdstat I see this: Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[2](F) sda2[0] 77842880 blocks [2/1] [U_] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]

I think I have solved my issue and would like some input from anyone who has done this for pitfalls, errors, or if I am just wrong. Centos 5.x, software raid, 250gb drives. 2 drives in mirror, one spare. All same size. 2 devices in the mirror, one boot (about 100MB), one that fills the rest of disk and contains LVM partitions. I was thinking of taking out the spare and adding a 500gb drive. I

Hello, i have a little problem. Our server has an broken RAID. # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sda1[2](F) sdb1[1] 2096064 blocks [2/1] [_U] md2 : active raid1 sda3[2](F) sdb3[1] 1462516672 blocks [2/1] [_U] md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 524224 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: <none> I have remove the partition: # mdadm --remove

Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck everything. But I cannot. The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot, /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5. So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file systems, and try to run fsck -y /dev/md0 fsck -y /dev/md1 fsck -y /dev/md2 For each try I get an error message:

I'm using Centos 4.5 right now, and I had a RAID 5 array stop because two drives became unavailable. After adjusting the cables on several occasions and shutting down and restarting, I was able to see the drives again. This is when I snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Please, someone with vast knowledge of how RAID 5 with mdadm works, tell me if I have any chance at all

I am running software RAID1 on a somewhat critical server. Today I noticed one drive is giving errors. Good thing I had RAID. I planned on upgrading this server in next month or so. Just wandering if there was an easy way to fix this to avoid rushing the upgrade? Having a single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think. Thanks. Feb 7 15:28:28 server smartd[2980]: Device: /dev/sdb

On 04/23/2022 09:19 PM, H wrote: > On 04/19/2022 09:57 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> On 4/18/22 1:27 PM, H wrote: >>> I have a new computer with 2 x 2TB SSDs where I wanted to install C7 and use mdadm for RAID1 configuration and encrypting the /home partition. On the net I found https://tuxfixer.com/centos-7-installation-with-lvm-raid-1-mirroring/ which I adopted slightly with

I am planning to increase the disk space on my desktop system. It is running CentOS 5.9 w/XEN. I have two 160Gig 2.5" laptop (2.5") SATA drives in two slots of a 4-slot hot swap bay configured like this: Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End

This series fixes inspection in the case that fstab contains references to md devices. I've made a few changes since the previous posting, which I've summarised below. [PATCH 1/8] build: Create an MD variant of the dummy Fedora image I've double checked that no timestamp is required in the Makefile. The script will not run a second time to build fedora-md2.img. [PATCH 2/8] build:

So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see this: mdadm --detail /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Mon Sep 27 22:47:44 2010 Raid Level : raid10 Array Size : 976759808 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB) Used Dev Size : 976759808 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB) Raid

Sun, 15 Nov 2020 14:16:48 -0800 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 11/15/20 3:32 AM, ?ukasz Posadowski wrote: > > Do anyone can suggest what else I forgot to do? > > > Use metadata version 1.2 instead of 0.9. > > You need for the filesystem to be not visible until after the RAID is > assembled, and the easiest way to do that is to put the

Hi, This is my current config: /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 /dev/md2 -> 18 GB -> sdb1 + sde1 -> form VolGroup00 with md1 sda,sdd -> 36 GB 10k SCSI HDDs sdb,sde -> 18 GB 10k SCSI HDDs I have added 2 36 GB 10K SCSI drives in it, they are detected as sdc and sdf. What should I do if I

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 16:46 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/04/2014 05:45 AM, David McGuffey wrote: > In practice, however, there's a bunch of information you didn't provide, > so some of those steps are wrong. > > I'm not sure what dm-0, dm-2 and dm-3 are, but they're indicated in your > mdstat. I'm guessing that you made partitions, and then made

I just installed CentOS 5.4 64 bit release on a 1.9ghz CPU with 8gB of RAM. It has 2 Western Digital 1.5TB SATA2 drives in RAID1. [root at server ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md2 1.4T 1.4G 1.3T 1% / /dev/md0 99M 19M 76M 20% /boot tmpfs 4.0G 0 4.0G 0% /dev/shm [root at server ~]# Its barebones

I'am running CentOS 4.3 on an (Intel) with one SATA disk (/dev/sda). The output of fdisk -l: Disk /dev/sda: 81.9 GB, 81964302336 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9964 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 19 152586 83 Linux /dev/sda2 20 2569