similar to: CentOS 6.5 driver for a Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 chipset

Hello there! I was running CentOS 6.4 system on my Dell Latitude E6530 flawlessly, until I upgraded to CentOS 6.5. Now the wifi doesn't show up (it's a Broadcom Wifi BT4313, 14e4:4727), I tried to follow the steps from http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom but when attempting to compile the Broadcom driver module, the make command fails in a way that is not described

Hello All, ?I have a Dell Vostro 1550 laptop. i3 core, 64 bit, 8gb ram etc etc. I had a nic interface, but some how the wired nic is not working. So I am trying to use the BCM 4313 wireless chip, of this system, to connect to the internet. ?I have Cent os 6.5 (64 bit) installed with the required libraries and kernel sources, headers etc. I got the source code of the driver,

Hi, I've been using in the past the broadcom wifi card BCM4322 with Centos 7.1 one in the past, with kernel 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7 and driver 6_30_223_248 and it worked well. Now I updated Centos to 7.2 and the driver is not compiling any more under kernel 3.10.0-327.3.1.el7. Neither driver 6_30_223_238 nor 6_30_223_271. Does any body experienced the same issues? Cheers, Roberto Nebot --

Dear All, I'm having trouble on 2 laptops Lenovo B580 since upgrading to Centos6.5. ( Because it's a Lenovo I cannot switch the network card for a better supported network card. ) There on the latest kernel : root at jac network-scripts]# uname -a Linux jac.cawdekempen 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 13 13:06:13 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux With the help of

Hey All! I've validated the Broadcom chipset 4321 on 7.3 with the latest 64-bit Broadcom driver(6_30_223_271) if someone with edit capability can update the table please: https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom https://wiki.centos .org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom#head-5b5da35ce5cedf2cddd2e815739a64758e341ab8 Table entry: Chip: BCM4321 EL version: CentOS 7.3 Kernel:

Hi all, I'm a complete newbie in Linux and am trying to get my Broadcom BCM4313 working in my Lenovo S10-3t netbook (CentOS 6.3 installed from LiveCD). I followed the steps in the wiki, which lead me to ELRepo: wl-kmod. I followed the instructions there until Step 2: $ mkdir -p ~/rpmbuild/{BUILD,RPMS,SPECS,SOURCES,SRPMS} $ echo -e "%_topdir $(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild\n%dist .el$(lsb_release

Dear All, I'm trying to configure wireless card on a Dell Vostro 1540. I had a look at this site : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom?action=show wireless card :# /sbin/lspci | grep Broadcom 12:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller (rev 01) I decided to follow the ELrepo instructions suggested on the site :

Hello, I noticed that with latest kernel (2.6.32-573.7.1.el6.centos.plus.x86_64), my laptop's Wifi doesn't work, whereas with previous kernel (2.6.32-504.30.3.el6.centos.plus.x86_64), it works fine. Is this a known issue or did I miss something new? BTW, `lspci` says: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01) Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part

Wanted to report success, following this procedure: https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom At the bottom, I see something of a compatibility matrix, but a line representing my specific setup does not exists. So I offer the following data to show that it works in my environment. [erik at localhost ~]$ uname -r 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 [erik at localhost ~]$ cat

Hello, The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac since 2.6.39). But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? Thanks, -- Philippe Naudin

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 7:17 AM, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > > I noticed that with latest kernel (2.6.32-573.7.1.el6.centos.plus.x86_64), > my laptop's Wifi doesn't work, whereas with previous kernel > (2.6.32-504.30.3.el6.centos.plus.x86_64), it works fine. > > Is this a known issue or did I miss something new? > > BTW, `lspci` says:

The hybrid feature in fisher.test looks to me like an excellent way to analyze my two-way tables. The only problem is that it does not seem to be implemented. Am I right about this? An example is pasted below. I note that I get the warning message only when I shouldn't: for a 2x2 table hybrid seems to be ignored without warning. In no case does fisher.test seem to be checking Cochran

Hi John: Thanks! Below is the data using your suggestion. I used "ggplot" to make a graph. I am not too happy with it. I am looking for something simpler and cleaner. Plot is attached. I also tried "lattice" package, but nothing got plotted with "xyplot" command, because it is looking for a numeric variable on x-axis. ggplot(TrialData4, aes(x=Income, y=Percent,

Btw, I think "lattice" graphics will provide a better solution than "ggplot", because it puts appropriate (space saving) markers on the axes and does axes labels well. However, I cannot figure out how to do it in "lattice". On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 15:11, Anupam Tyagi <anuptyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John: > > Thanks! Below is the data using your

On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 15:21, Anupam Tyagi <anuptyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > Btw, I think "lattice" graphics will provide a better solution than > "ggplot", because it puts appropriate (space saving) markers on the axes > and does axes labels well. However, I cannot figure out how to do it in > "lattice". You will need to convert Income to a

Hallo Anupam I do not see much difference in ggplot or lattice, they seems to me provide almost identical results when removing theme part from ggplot. library(ggplot2) library(lattice) ggplot(TrialData4, aes(x=Income, y=Percent, group=Measure)) + geom_point() + geom_line() + facet_wrap(~Measure) xyplot(Percent ~ Income | Measure, TrialData4, type = "o", pch = 16, as.table =

Thanks! You are correct, the graphs look very similar, except ggplot is scaling the text font to make it more readable. Is there a way to scale down the x-axis labels, so they are readable? On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 12:02, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > Hallo Anupam > > I do not see much difference in ggplot or lattice, they seems to me > provide almost identical

Hi, I have hybrid smp running with autoxlate. However, without autoxlate, I am running into issues realted to TLB flush. The guest in this case makes multicalls as part of which cache is flushed (__do_update_va_mapping, etc..). However, the guest is using VPIDs and it is getting complicated. I can just xen not do any TLB management and let the guest just do it after return from the hypercall.

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Lukas Wunner <lukas at wunner.de> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:03:26AM +0000, Mike Lothian wrote: >> On 12 February 2018 at 03:39, Lukas Wunner <lukas at wunner.de> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:35:51AM +0000, Mike Lothian wrote: >> > > I've not been able to reproduce the original problem you're

Hi Ian/Stefano: I changed over to the PV clock for hybrid liked we talked at the hackathon. I still have the hang in update_wall_time() after dom0 switches to xen as clocksource. The source of hang seems to be in xen stime_local_stamp in cpu_time that suddenly jumps to a large 64bit value. I''ve been chasing to figure where that happens, and why for the hybrid and not PV. It appears the