similar to: OEM suggestions

Folks, My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that Evolution claims to, but.... It's got to be able to set dates, etc. Can Evolution? Any other suggestions? mark

Hi, Has anyone on this list had any success with installing and using Open Cobol on RH or CentOS? Any pointers would be very welcome. I have Googled and am working with Vince on the Open Cobol mailing list to try to resolve installation problems. ChrisG

Y'know, I was just reading an article about a Spanish Linux group filing a complaint with the EU regulators about UEFI, and I was struck by a thought: why is it that the OEM does not provide the UEFI key with the hardware FOR THAT BOARD AND UEFI, rather than have it provided by M$? Any clues (or should I just assume it's more M$ kickbacks...)? mark

Does anyone have a collection of stupid hold music? Y'know, the sort of thing that would drive a person mad? Silly songs, repetative tunes etc? The best I can come up with is; I know a song that drives everyone up the wall I know a song that drives everyone up the wall I know a song that drives everyone up the wall And this is how it goes I know a song that drives everyone up the wall I

Got a HBS (y'know, Honkin' Big Server, one o' them technical terms), a Dell 720 with two Tesla GPUs. I updated the o/s, 6.5, and I cannot get the GPUs recognized. As a last resort, I d/l NVidia's proprietary driver/installer, 325, and it builds fine... I've yum removed the kmod-nvidia I had on the system, nouveau is blacklisted, and when I reboot, lsmod shows me nvidia loaded,

Hi, Any folks on this list who have installed CentOS 6.3 on the new Dell Poweredge R815 servers? How was your experience? Thanks -Surya -- Surya Saha Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Cornell University, NY, USA http://www.linkedin.com/in/suryasaha

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:38:23AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > + /* Read the umask. */ > > + if (read (fd[0], &mask, sizeof mask) != sizeof mask) { > > + perrorf (g, "read"); > > + close (fd[0]); > > + return -1; > > Oops - this strands a child process. You have to reap the child, even > if the read() failed. Bleah that was

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, November 2, 2017 11:21 am, hw wrote: >> Richard Zimmerman wrote: >>> hw wrote: >>>> Next question: you want RAID, how much storage do you need? Will 4 or >>>> 8 >>>> 3.5" drives be enough (DO NOT GET crappy 2.5" drives - they're *much* >>>> more expensive than the 3.5" drives,

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:10:14AM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I just updated a system - as in minutes ago, and log back in after it >> reboots, and this is in dmesg: >> [ 88.202272] systemd-readahead[484]: >> open(/var/tmp/dracut.fP4yj1/initramfs/usr/bin/loginctl) failed: Too many >> levels of symbolic links >> [

There was an upgrade on a couple of our servers yesterday, mid-afternoon our time, of httpd and httpd-devel, and suddenly SiteMinder (bleah) stopped working correctly, and is now pegging a cpu, according to top. So, as a last resort, I tried downgrading both of them. When I did so, the server that uses ssl *erased* mod-ssl, not downgrading it, and I'll have to find where I can get the previous

OK, general question for the community -- what''s the coolest startup using Rails? I don''t think "37 Signals" is a fair answer. I''m curious as to what kind of other developments are happening. Are there a lot of startups using Rails in the first place? Or do most of you who are lucky enough to do Rails for a living (I''m coding Java, bleah) work in large

John R Pierce wrote: > On 10/7/2015 3:14 PM, Matt wrote: >> I have 3 4TB WD drives I want to put in a RAID1 array. >> >> Two WD4000FYYZ >> >> and >> >> One WD4000F9YZ >> >> All enterprise class but two are WD Re and one is WD Se. I ordered >> the first two thinking 2 drives in the raid array would be sufficient >> but later

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:03 -0500, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Reid, > > First, thanks for the excellent overview. This seems like it will be very > useful. > > I have a question about dist-check. > > You mention that it will triple the amount of disk space I am using. I am > guessing its because it does the following: > > 11. runs make dist > > 12.

> ps: my little suggestion: if we add some parameters at smb.conf like > protected dir = /home/share, /home/user1 ; > trashcan dir = /smbtrash ; Such an addon to samba would make me weep tears of joy. The trashcan is a "security blanket" feature that Windows/MacOS/OS2/BeOS users now take for granted. Convincing them that this is now impossible because we've

Hi Reid, > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:03 -0500, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > It it necessary for dist-check to run make dist? > > Y'know, when I typed that, I knew you were going to ask that. It > doesn't make sense to me either. Seems a bit overkillish to me. I think a `make distcheck' should do a `make dist' because it checks that a tarball can reproduce itself.

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:09:04PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > >> Not intending to contradict (if that ends up as pain, it will be > >> your pain anyway ;-) but I would go higher with specs if you intend > >> to use Linux on it. Linux tends to grow its

Posted on behalf of Mark (m.roth at 5-cent.us) who is currently experiencing technical difficulties with his Internet connection --------------------------------- > On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > >> I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the project, rather than being a backseat driver and griping at every change ........

Robert Heller wrote: > At Tue, 29 May 2018 06:47:06 -0700 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > wrote: >> On 05/29/2018 06:33 AM, Robert Heller wrote: >> > >> >> The UUID in the EFI boot options is >> >> 99E275E7-75A0-4B37-A2E6-C5385E600CB, which >> >> does not to match anything, but the system is only happy booting the >>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:04:39AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/14/2016 07:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:38:23AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >>> + /* Read the umask. */ > >>> + if (read (fd[0], &mask, sizeof mask) != sizeof mask) { > >>> + perrorf (g, "read"); > >>> + close (fd[0]);

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:48:11AM -0700, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/02/2017 03:38 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:09:04PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > >>> Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Not intending to contradict (if that ends up as pain,