similar to: Blosxom + Markdown problem: randomised email links break RSS, Atom

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Blosxom + Markdown problem: randomised email links break RSS, Atom"

2016 Aug 25
2
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On 08/25/2016 10:44 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >> smoketest environments -- match the production environment > > > I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: > > http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html Great resource!
2016 Aug 25
3
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On 08/24/2016 07:53 PM, Peter wrote: > On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote: >> To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any >> version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been >> using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I >> need to be able to test and use the builds. We'll be
2024 Mar 15
2
RSS Feed of NEWS needs a hand
Hi! Thanks for this service! It is very helpful to know what is being developed. I distribute the content to other venues and I noticed some times that the updates are duplicated. For example, the sentence "?is.R()? is deprecated as no other S dialect is known to be in use (and this could only identify historical dialects, not future ones)." is duplicated in different days: Day 1:
2016 Aug 25
0
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- > smoketest environments -- match the production environment I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html
2016 Aug 26
0
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On 26/08/16 06:18, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >>> smoketest environments -- match the production environment >> >> >> I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: >> >>
2016 Aug 26
1
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On 08/25/2016 06:26 PM, Peter wrote: > On 26/08/16 06:18, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >>>> smoketest environments -- match the production environment >>> >>> >>> I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB:
2024 Apr 02
2
RSS Feed of NEWS needs a hand
On 02/04/2024 8:50 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 2 April 2024 at 07:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | On 2 April 2024 at 08:21, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > | | I have just added R-4-4-branch to the feeds. I think I've also fixed > | | the \I issue, so today's news includes a long list of old changes. > | > | These feeds can fussy: looks like you triggered
2009 Oct 15
1
R RSS feed
I was trying to subscribe to an RSS feed from <http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html> but IE chokes on DTDs and Firefox also has trouble with this feed. (I'm not sure if it has trouble with DTDs in general.) I went to one of our web developers to see what I should use to read the feed, and he pointed out that the mix of RSS 2.00 and rss-0.91 looks like a mistake: <!--
2007 Jul 09
1
CRANberries -- An RSS feed about New and Updated CRAN packages
Announcing CRANberries -- An RSS feed about New and Updated CRAN packages A new RSS feed [1] is now available that summarizes uploads to CRAN. This makes it possibly to quickly obtain concise information about which (of the now over one thousand !!) packages were added or updated at CRAN and its mirrors. To this end, two basic variants are provided: - a feed for new packages where we display
2007 Jul 09
1
CRANberries -- An RSS feed about New and Updated CRAN packages
Announcing CRANberries -- An RSS feed about New and Updated CRAN packages A new RSS feed [1] is now available that summarizes uploads to CRAN. This makes it possibly to quickly obtain concise information about which (of the now over one thousand !!) packages were added or updated at CRAN and its mirrors. To this end, two basic variants are provided: - a feed for new packages where we display
2024 Mar 15
1
RSS Feed of NEWS needs a hand
Years ago Duncan set up a nightly job to feed RSS based off changes to NEWS, borrowing some setup parts from CRANberries as for example the RSS 'compiler'. That job is currently showing the new \I{...} curly protection in an unfavourable light. Copying from the RSS reader I had pointed at this since the start [1], for today I see (indented by four spaces) CHANGES IN R-devel
2015 Sep 01
3
Has the changelog for R-devel and R-patched moved?
Hello. There used to be changelog of sorts for R-devel [1] and R-release [2]. Neither have been updated since 2015-07-24. Have these moved elsewhere, or are they no longer being updated? Thank you, Avi [1] <http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS> [2] <http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-3-2-branch/NEWS>
2015 Feb 18
3
Color Coding in R-devel/NEWS
On this feed, which I think is the place we should monitor upcoming changes: http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS What is the significance of the green and pink highlighting? Thanks, Bryan
2015 Sep 01
2
Has the changelog for R-devel and R-patched moved?
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01 Sep 2015, at 16:21 , Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> There used to be changelog of sorts for R-devel [1] and R-release [2]. >> Neither have been updated since 2015-07-24. Have these moved >> elsewhere, or are they no longer
2020 May 15
2
Daily News about R-devel/NEWS is not updating
Hi: The "Daily News about R-devel/NEWS" webpage at http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS seems to not be updating. As of today, the latest entry is Tue, 14 Apr 2020. Thanks. Jen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2008 Dec 06
1
R 2.8.1 ?
Duncan's 'R changes' feed at http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel showed a steady flow of bugfixes and patches in 2.8.0 yet http://developer.r-project.org/ is silent on the topic. Is there any expectation of a point release before 2.9.0 rolls around in April? Cheers, Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
2016 Jan 03
1
Wrong bug ID & URL in Daily News about R-devel/NEWS
I was browsing some recent R news at http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS/2016/01/03#n2016-01-03 And reading this item: "tapply() has been made considerably more efficient without changing functionality, thanks to proposals from Peter Haverty and Suharto Anggono. (PR#16488)" But I found that the link in the item goes to a page about the GUI, not tapply:
2023 Nov 17
1
Regenerate news feeds?
The news feeds (e.g. https://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS) have some stray "\abbr" floating around. Do they need generating with a more recent version of R-devel? I've run tools::Rd2txt on https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/doc/NEWS.Rd and r85550 does seem to remove these abberations (compared to the same function calling on an unpatched 4.3.2 where they
2013 Sep 15
1
FOSS licence with BuildVignettes: false
Dear All, I have been checking the metafor package against R-devel. R CMD check --as-cran metafor yields one note: FOSS licence with BuildVignettes: false Yes, I have 'BuildVignettes: FALSE' in my DESCRIPTION file. I see at http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 CHANGES IN R-devel UTILITIES 'R CMD check --as-cran' warns about a false
2012 May 11
1
Passing externalptr to .C()
Greetings. 2.15.0 added this behavior http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS/2012/03/29#n2012-03-29 o Passing R objects other than atomic vectors, functions, lists and environments to .C() is now deprecated and will give a warning. Most cases (especially NULL) are actually coding errors. NULL will be disallowed in future. This seems to make sense,