Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Invalid seqno and short packets"
2011 Jan 03
1
Tinc improvements
Dear Guus,
I've attached my first git commit to your repository.
It does not contain any new functionalities, but it is a first try to
interact with your git copy.
Could you please verify, if you can push this commit to your repository?
If it works, I'll send you the rest of my work, which contains:
1) some small improvements in logging
(using flags instead of counters)
2) the
2019 Jul 19
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 005/171] drm/virtio: set seqno for dma-fence
From: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit efe2bf965522bf0796d413b47a2abbf81d471d6f ]
This is motivated by having meaningful ftrace events, but it also
fixes use cases where dma_fence_is_later is called, such as in
sync_file_merge.
In other drivers, fence creation and cmdbuf submission normally
happen atomically,
mutex_lock();
fence = dma_fence_create(...,
2019 Jul 19
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 004/141] drm/virtio: set seqno for dma-fence
From: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit efe2bf965522bf0796d413b47a2abbf81d471d6f ]
This is motivated by having meaningful ftrace events, but it also
fixes use cases where dma_fence_is_later is called, such as in
sync_file_merge.
In other drivers, fence creation and cmdbuf submission normally
happen atomically,
mutex_lock();
fence = dma_fence_create(...,
2015 Dec 22
0
Invalid packet seqno: 58073 != 0 from host5
This smells like https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/pull/104 - are you
sure you're using latest HEAD? How often does this occur? Does it
correlate with other events such as nodes joining or leaving? Does it
occur more often if you reduce the value of KeyExpire?
On 22 December 2015 at 16:10, Florent B <florent at coppint.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With latest Tinc 1.1 git code, I have
2016 Sep 07
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Skip fence context seqno check if notifies are enabled
If the fence context has notifies enabled, each of the fences'
FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT will be updated from the interrupt. We can rely
on this status for reporting the current fence_is_signaled() and so
avoid an expensive uncached read.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc:
2005 Sep 08
0
cvs head and seqno 102 (Critical Response) messages for Cisco 7960
I've being using the same non-nat config for a 7960 for about a year with no
issues.
I have just upgraded cvs head from the 16th of July to todays.
About a minute after I make a call I get the message
chan_sip.c:1132 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission
000b46a0-8661007f-5c457e72-2b0dba2c@192.168.123.20 for seqno 102 (Critical
Response)
I don't get this for other
2004 Aug 20
0
Max retries exceeded on call - seqno 102 (critical request)
I've seen other request info on this config before.
I've got the system up and running, Zap/Modem has been working for
several days, no errors/warnings.
Simply added info for broadvoice and I can dial into my system via the
remote, but dial out from my box renders the following:
I get one ring on the remote line, then on the console
chan_sip.c:675 retans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded
2010 Sep 20
0
No subject
+0100
From: Daniel Schall <tinc-devel at mon-clan.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 17:00:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Improved PMTU discovery
diff --git a/lib/dropin.c b/lib/dropin.c
index 52fb5b8..2b803b1 100644
--- a/lib/dropin.c
+++ b/lib/dropin.c
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@
#endif
=20
#ifdef HAVE_MINGW
-int usleep(long usec) {
- Sleep(usec / 1000);
- return 0;
-}
+//int usleep(long usec) {
+//
2014 Aug 08
0
tinc1.1pre10 for Windows
Hi,
I am a big fan of your project.
Recently, I was trying to upgrade from tinc 1.1pre9 to pre10, and activating
the experimental protocol, but a few things are not working.
First of all, required libraries are missing in the windows installer, e.g.
zlib.dll.
Luckily, I still got them lying around from earlier versions (I don't
remember, where I got them exactly.)
I don't recall
2005 Oct 11
0
CESA-YYYY:NNN <level> CentOS 4 axp <package> - <short explanation>
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory YYYY:NNN
<url>
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
files:
-----------------------------------------------------------
The above will present the format of CentOS-4.2/alpha
CESA-announcements. Here the 'alpha' is for axp and arch is labeled as
'axp' on subjects as 'alpha'
2015 Aug 19
0
Seeing: "Got REQ_KEY from XXX while we already started a SPTPS session!"
I'm running tinc 1.1pre11 with AutoConnect set to 'yes' and I recently
started seeing lots of these messages on my VPN and cannot connect to
various hosts from other hosts:
(I have obscured the hostnames and vpn name, but otherwise this is a direct
paste from syslog)
Aug 19 14:51:51 AAA tinc.nnn[2217]: Got REQ_KEY from XXX while we already
started a SPTPS session!
Aug 19 14:51:54 AAA
2016 Feb 22
0
Invalid packet seqno: 58073 != 0 from host5
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Florent B wrote:
> I still have this "bug"... any idea of what's going wrong ?
There are some situations where keys are being renegotiated that can
cause two peers to be very briefly out of sync. If that happens when
there is VPN traffic, it could cause that message to pop up. If it only
happens once in a while and you don't notice
2015 Dec 10
2
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
Hello,
Guus Sliepen, on Wed 02 Dec 2015 13:53:37 +0100, wrote:
> That's great! It would be good though to split
> handle_incoming_vpn_data() into a function that does the actual
> recvfrom/mmsg() and one that processes each individual packet, to reduce
> the level of indentation and make the functions a bit more readable.
> Then I'll merge it :)
Here it is.
Samuel
2015 Dec 10
0
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
10.12.2015 03:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
[]
I suggest reducing ifdeffery in handle_incoming_vpn_data(), especially
the error checking code.
The function isn't that large now, it might be much better to have
two different implementations. Like this (untested, patch attached):
void handle_incoming_vpn_data(int sock) {
#ifdef HAVE_RECVMMSG
#define MAX_MSG 256
vpn_packet_t
2007 Dec 11
1
Asterisk not sending 200 OK
We're trying to get a SIP peer going between our asterisk box and our
provider. It should then ring our phone.
The call does come in and it does execute the extension in the dial
plan. But the provider says they never get a 200 OK back and therefore
they send another INVITE and then after a few seconds drop the call.
Here's our setup:
sip.conf
[ngt-trunk]
type=peer
qualify=yes
port=5060
2007 Mar 29
3
Asterisk hangs up SIP call after 6 200 retransmits
I have the following scenario:
PSTN gateway (202.180.nnn.nnn) -> OpenSER 1.0.1 (147.202.nnn.nnn) -> Asterisk 1.2.16
(203.89.nnn.nnn)
When an incoming call is received, often (but not always) Asterisk repeatedly sends a SIP 200 OK message and eventually hangs up the call.
sip.conf
[general]
port = 5060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all
2008 Jun 27
2
Megatec and Belkin F6H550-UPS
Hi Jayson,
I forward your request to the right place.
Carlos (or some other) will have an answer, or at least some questions for you.
-- Arnaud
2008/6/27 Jayson Anderson <jayson.anderson at gmail.com>:
> Greetings Arnaud,
>
> I wrote you some time ago about whether NUT would support the Belkin
> F6H550-UPS device in the future.
>
> You had replied and mentioned to send
2007 Aug 14
0
Maximum retries for seqno 102 when re-inviting.
We have an interesting issue:
One of our providers has two softswitches. Calls coming from the
first one are handled fine by asterisk, calls coming from the second
one and going through the first one are euhm... dropped half a
second into the RTP stream.
I have opened a ticket at Digium for it:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10449
The output of "sip debug" is funny from line
2004 Sep 28
1
Sep 28 17:52:28 WARNING[163850]: chan_sip.c:673 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call 2bda648025dbf8c52fd293515d98d2c2@216.252.176.45 for seqno 102 (Non-critical Request)
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5921 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040928/74245e28/attachment.jpeg
2005 Jul 04
2
Extensions will not go to voicemail
I have a remote installation that connects via IAX from my office pbx.
When I call an extension on the remote pbx, after the dial period, the
call is terminated. Nothing I do in configuration of that extension
seems to matter:
-- Executing NoOp("IAX2/netconcepts@nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn:4569-5", ""Dial
710"") in new stack
-- Executing