similar to: Any plans to support standardized authenticated encryption?

Hello, Are there any known efforts to implement RFC 5647 i.e. AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell Transport Layer Protocol for OpenSSH? If not, would OpenSSH project be interested in such feature? Thanks.

Hello, I have a UPS unit attached to the "D-Link 320 ShareCenter", a SOHO 2-bay NAS. I set up the UPS in "Master Mode". Unfortunately it doesn't supply any kind of useful info in the web interface, so I had to connect via ?nc' to port 3493 to get the proper UPS name. I manage to to issue a successful ?upsc? command: root at galois:~# upsc megatec at 192.168.3.6

Hello, I have a UPS unit attached to the "D-Link 320 ShareCenter", a SOHO 2-bay NAS. I set up the UPS in "Master Mode". Unfortunately it doesn't supply any kind of useful info in the web interface, so I had to connect via ?nc' to port 3493 to get the proper UPS name. I manage to to issue a successful ?upsc? command: root at galois:~# upsc megatec at 192.168.3.6

Galois, Inc. is pleased to announce the immediate release of the Haskell Lightweight Virtual Machine (or HaLVM), version 1.0. The HaLVM is a port of the GHC runtime system to the Xen hypervisor, allowing programmers to create Haskell programs that run directly on Xen''s "bare metal." Internally, Galois has used this system in several projects with much success, and we hope

I was able to root the NAS using this howto[1] - from a rather sketchy blog, full of clickbaits - and found out the default configuration: [root] password = 123 upsmon master [client] password = 123 upsmon slave I bet these are the defaults for every DNS-3xx series out there. I wonder why they did not put the info on the manual. I?m posting this for the ?future generations?.. In case anyone

05.07.2020, 05:22, "Roman Lebedev" <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Shawn Landden via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>  Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more. >> >>  This proposal is to add a

Hi, I just stepped on a strange and very annoying bug in rsync-3.1.0 as shipped with SuSE Linux Enterprise 12, but verified the bug also with rsync-HEAD-20170123. I tried to copy some of my movie collection to a usb disk that our TV could read, so it was formatted with vfat. I forgot that vfat can't handle files > 4 GB, and some of the movies were larger. rsync worked for 3 hours copying

<div> </div><div><div><p>Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more.</p><p>This proposal is to add a <code>llvm.clmul</code> instruction. Or if that is contentious, <code>llvm.experimental.bitmanip.clmul</code> instruction.

(As per IRC discussion) I understand that the carry-less multiplication algorithm has it's uses since/and it is implemented as an instruction in many architectures and that adding it as a general-purpose intrinsic will allow us to drop target-specific intrinsics as by-product. What i do *NOT* understand is: what is the actual/main goal/driving factor of adding an LLVM intrinsic for it? The

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre10. Here is a summary of the changes: * Added a benchmark tool (sptps_speed) for the new protocol. * Fixed a crash when using Name = $HOST while $HOST is not set. * Use AES-256-GCM for the new protocol. * Updated support for Solaris. * Allow running tincd without a private ECDSA key present when ExperimentalProtocol is not

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre10. Here is a summary of the changes: * Added a benchmark tool (sptps_speed) for the new protocol. * Fixed a crash when using Name = $HOST while $HOST is not set. * Use AES-256-GCM for the new protocol. * Updated support for Solaris. * Allow running tincd without a private ECDSA key present when ExperimentalProtocol is not

On 05.07.20 12:21, Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev wrote: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Shawn Landden via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more. >> >> This proposal is to add a

Hi Sam, I've not actually gotten to the linking process with my runtime, as I've compiled it with clang -emit-llvm -c, and then archived it with llvm-ar and llvm-ranlib. I'm also not producing a GC plugin, as I'm using the builtin "shadow-stack" strategy. My current build process looks like this: 1. build the compiler 2. build the runtime using clang -emit-llvm -c

Forgot to CC the list. ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: Trevor Elliott <trevor at galois.com> > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 7:33:15 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM GC > > Hi Trevor, > > Are you linking with LibStdC++ or LibC++? That is a requirement for running > code that has been compiled from C++

Hello folks: The introduction: Great product this Samba! The problem: I am trying to migrate an HP LaserJet 4 printer in our office off a VMS system and hang it directly off the back of a UNIX machine. I have created the new entry in the printcap (see below) file on that machine and can print from UNIX - no problem. I created the share in Samba with what I think works pretty well (see below).

Hi, I am sorry for sending this query again here, but maybe I sent it to wrong list yesterday. I am trying to compile LonestarGPU-rev2.0 <http://iss.ices.utexas.edu/?p=projects/galois/lonestargpu/download> benchmark suite with LLVM/CLANG. This suite has a following piece of code (more info here

Hi there, is it possible to use such encryption like SSL/TLS for authenticating users on a mountpoint? I can't find somethin like that in the docmentation and it would be nice to have such a mechanism like that, because all passwords will be transmitted in PLAIN text. This is not very secure, because anyone can see the usernames and passwords in his sniffer program. Would be pleased if

Parke, Thank you for your suggestion, but I am already using those subnet settings. And how could they be wrong if the two peers start communicating at some point without changing the settings? Henk -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: tinc [mailto:tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org] Namens Parke Verzonden: vrijdag 22 december 2017 23:20 Aan: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Onderwerp: Re: Having problems

Hello, I've recently set up Samba (4.12.3) on Arch Linux as the target for Time Machine backups for a couple of Macs. Shortly thereafter I started seeing OOMs whenever a backup would start. I stumbled upon disabling encryption on the server (i.e. changing "smb encrypt" from "required" to "off") to prevent this issue. After further digging, I'm able to

Hi Thomas, On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:43:28AM +0200, Thomas B. Ruecker wrote: > Do players support https? obviously not. But the implementation of SSL in a player isn't that hard. In a matter of fact, SSL isn't the best solution for a public stream, but I want to use it for a private stream, where every user has the knowledge how to use a player with ssl. :-) > You could simply set