similar to: Tinc1.1pre10 on Windows 8.1?

Hello, we currently set up a large tinc network with 2 central Nodes (these nodes connecting to each other). All satellites (ca 40) connect to these both machines. All containing two ConntectTo fields (for backup) e.g. (satellite) Name = nfp_hy Device = /dev/tun PrivateKeyFile = /etc/tinc/nfp_hy/rsa_key.priv ConnectTo = nfp_f_vpn ConnectTo = nfp_c_vpn If the count of satellites reaches

Hi there I have the following setup Home - Main Tinc server with public IP running on PfSense work - tinc client running behind a CISCO ASA firewall with public IP running on Windows 10 offsite - tinc client running on tomato router behind a double NAT Home & offsite connect & i can see all PCs & devices & connect to them easily, on either side work to Home or offsite connects

Hello, I have been reading through the documentation and trying to set up a very small VPN as a test for a larger rollout that I would like to complete in the future but cannot get this working. The configuration seems like it should be relatively simple, so I'm most likely missing something basic but I just cannot see what I'm doing wrong. At the moment I am trying to get this working

Hello, I'm trying to test a tinc vpn between two Linux hosts on the same ethernet. If I start tinc on both sides as 'tinc -n test --bypass-security --debug=5' I can ping both machines from each other and tcpdump shows that the packets pass through the tun-device created by tinc. Connection from 192.168.192.17 port 32852 Sending ID to (null) (192.168.192.17 port 32852): 0 helix 17

Hello list, I try to install puppet agent on Debian Lenny. I got following error. Seems the repo is broken : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- node001:~# wget http://apt.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs-release-lenny.deb --2012-10-12 02:12:12-- http://apt.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs-release-lenny.deb

Hello, I am tying to create tinc vpn for the ~1000 nodes and was thinking why meta connections are needed at all if I only need static configuration where every node knows addresses of other hosts and due to the amount of traffic any indirect connections will not work, so DirectOnly=yes is a must and then passing around routing information is not needed, right? Currently I have 10 nodes

I have now got the tinc demons (on network OFFICES) on BranchB and BranchA talking to each other, see below for log from BranchB. For some trouble shouting issues relating to OsX see at the end of my e-mail. However, I have not yet achieved the network connectivity/routing that I would like. The aim is: BranchB is a laptop I would like to connect it (via tinc) to my office network, so that

Hello! I have encountered a bug using tincd with Microsoft Windows: Below you'll find my Setup and my Logs. In short, i do the following: 1. office running tincd 1.0.7 and waiting for connections (no ConnectTo, but this does not resolve the issue) 2. the supporter starts up tincd 1.0.7 on windows (native) 3. ping from windows ("support") to the office: Here the error occours:

Hi, We want to deploy a tinc VPN, with more than 50 sites connected all arround the world. But we cannot trust all our sites with the same level, so the tinc solution (automatic full mesh) is "too automatic" for us : *any* node can add a new node which will be connected directly to others. A solution could be TLS (signing public keys), but create a PKI is another issue for us.

I have about 15 nodes running 1.1pre15 connected and running quite well. I don't remember why I installed 1.1preX originally. Possibly because I added a router with custom firmware to the network (Tomato Shibby firmware for my ASUS router) which included 1.1pre14. Now I'm trying to add an Openwrt device and it includes 1.0.33 only. This will replace the Tomato Shibby device with

I discovered that IPv6 is sort of working when I got an email rejection from Comcast for not having an IPv6 PTR record. I discovered I could telnet to port 25 on their MX server over IPv6! I then found I could tracroute6 to them, but I couldn't to my Linode VPS in Fremont. It gets to the data center and stops. Going the other way, my Linode can traceroute6 almost to my AT&T-hosted

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using tinc to connect a couple of ipv6 capable machines using a mix of upd6, udp4, tcp6 and tcp4. Now I wanted to add an linux embedded device, which has no ipv6 support at all. Tinc did compile and configuration is fine (tested on other machine), but after connecting the embedded device to other hosts tinc instances, it suddenly crashes.

I use dovecot on several servers. One of them uses a self-signed cert, it's just me. It worked fine until yesterday when I upgraded my desktop (NOT the server) to CentOS 7.4 Now thunderbird complains when it starts up, and won't let me confirm the security exception. On the server the following error occurs in the log: Sep 25 20:17:49 librelamp dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no

Hi, I am a big fan of your project. Recently, I was trying to upgrade from tinc 1.1pre9 to pre10, and activating the experimental protocol, but a few things are not working. First of all, required libraries are missing in the windows installer, e.g. zlib.dll. Luckily, I still got them lying around from earlier versions (I don't remember, where I got them exactly.) I don't recall

Hi, I was previously using tinc-1.1pre8 and it worked just fine, but after upgrading to tinc-1.1pre10 my Windows machine is unable to connect to my tinc network, as it fails to complete the handshake. Steps to reproduce: - Set up a Linux node with tinc-1.1pre10 using "tinc init" - Set up a Windows node with tinc-1.1pre10 using "tinc init", and try to make it connect to the

I'm not running any A/V software, and the same version of dovecot on servers with CA signed certs (komodo) - the client connects to them just fine. On 09/25/2017 01:40 PM, Tony wrote: > It does look like a client issue. Do you also have some kind of AV > running? There are some AV software that can sometimes interfere with > mail sessions. See if you might be running into a similar

Dynamic DNS updating is failing (which is bizarre, because I could have sworn I'd had it working before). Help? Setup: Samba 4 DC running bind 9.9.2, Samba 3.6.3 member The output of "net -d10 ads join" is attached, compressed. Interesting portions of named.conf: options { (no allow-updates section) ... tkey-gssapi-keytab "/var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab";

TL;DR: a proposal for a new tinc feature that allows nodes to filter ADD_SUBNET messages based on the metaconnection on which they are received, so that nodes can't impersonate each other's VPN Subnets. Similar to StrictSubnets in spirit, but way more flexible. BACKGROUND: THE ISSUE OF TRUST IN A TINC NETWORK In terms of metaconnections (I'm not discussing data tunnels here), one of

With the current Thunderbird I can not connect to one of my IMAP servers that uses a self-signed cert. Virtually identical IMAP servers that use CA signed certs work I was a bit out of date when I updated to 7.4 and was running Thunderbird 45.6.x and it worked. When I connected from evolution (which I do not like) it worked. When I connected with my laptop still running 45.6.x it works. so

Hallo, Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) waehring (1.1) | +-------------------+--------------+ | | | vpnhub1 (1.1) igor (1.1) turing (1.0) | | | +-------------------+--------------+ | tokamak Whenever another node outside of the graph connects to vpnhub or igor