Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "BindToAddress stopped working in 1.1pre10"
2014 Feb 07
2
[Announcement] Tinc version 1.1pre10 released
With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre10. Here is a
summary of the changes:
* Added a benchmark tool (sptps_speed) for the new protocol.
* Fixed a crash when using Name = $HOST while $HOST is not set.
* Use AES-256-GCM for the new protocol.
* Updated support for Solaris.
* Allow running tincd without a private ECDSA key present when
ExperimentalProtocol is not
2014 Feb 07
2
[Announcement] Tinc version 1.1pre10 released
With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre10. Here is a
summary of the changes:
* Added a benchmark tool (sptps_speed) for the new protocol.
* Fixed a crash when using Name = $HOST while $HOST is not set.
* Use AES-256-GCM for the new protocol.
* Updated support for Solaris.
* Allow running tincd without a private ECDSA key present when
ExperimentalProtocol is not
2016 May 06
1
Lots of Flushing x bytes to y would block messages
The server has a 1G symmetrical fibre line. It has been speedtested to
various local servers to be close to 800-900M. When there is only a single
client, there isn't much problem and as soon as the connection is made, the
ping time through to tunnel is a respectable 30ms. As soon as a few more
clients are connected, ping time degrades to hundreds and sometimes seconds
and with dropped packets.
2009 May 26
1
BindToAddress: TCP connections originate from random source address.
Hi,
I've stumbled upon a problem which I can't solve easily with the
available options in tinc - at least as far as I see. If enlightenment
is all I need, I'll happily accept pointers ;)
I try to establish a connection between two hosts. Each host has
multiple addresses assigned to it's internet interface. A stripped down
list would be:
Host 1:
2001:780:0:1e::1
2015 Apr 23
2
Strange Traffic Problem
I'm been experiencing a very very odd problem for the past several weeks and
am throwing it out in case someone can shed some light on it for me.
There is a single box on our tinc mesh which can be pinged from all hosts,
but cannot ping any. It is not limited to ping, the box cannot communicate
over tinc. tinc is running in router mode for this mesh. ~30 other nodes
function normally,
2016 Jul 25
0
How does tinc server handle the case one client's key file is removed after connection
Thanks Guus for the quick answer, I will give a try now.
Рысь,
In my case we don't want to restart tinc "server" at all, therefore what
might
happen is that the client is still connected to server while its public key
was already
removed from server.
I will try the signal approach.
Heng
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:42 PM, <tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org> wrote:
> Send tinc
2018 Apr 11
0
Route certain trafic via a tinc node that is not directly connected.
Hello again :)
Thank you all for your reply's. Below are the config files of the 3 hosts.
I use tinc in router mode. I do not have a kernel mode config lines
anywhere so tinc must be using the default settings here.
I added the ipaddressx to subnets on hostc and this works. Traffic to
that ip is now routed via hostc.
But since this ipaddressx address changes often I need to resolve it
2016 Feb 12
0
Tinc Router Mode - PING RESULT is destination host unreachable
El 12 de febrero de 2016 16:51:59 CET, Eric Yau <ericyaukhy at hotmail.com> escribi?:
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home
>network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration
>for
>your reference.
>
>
>
>Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1,
>10.0.0.1)
2016 Jan 22
1
Error starting tinc
No parameters using DNS.
- tinc.conf content
Name = sito1
AddressFamily = ipv4
BindToAddress = <IPPUB>:665
BindToInterface = int
Device=/dev/net/tun
Interface = vpndrif
Mode = router
PingInterval = 60
PingTimeout = 5
ProcessPriority = normal
- host/sito1 content
Address = <IPPUB>:665
Subnet = <IPLOCAL>/<NETMASK>
Port = 655
-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----
...
-----END
2017 Sep 30
1
Configuration working with 2 hosts but not with 3
Hi there,
I would need some help with my configuration. I have tried a long time,
but did not find my error. Thus I would really appreciate your help.
There are three hosts:
1. h181
2. h182: Should ConnectTo h181
3. h183: Should ConnectTo h181
*Files under /etc/tinc/vpn0/hosts*
[h181:]
Address = 94.130.108.xxx
Subnet = 172.16.1.1/32
-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----
***
-----END RSA PUBLIC
2018 Apr 11
1
Route certain trafic via a tinc node that is not directly connected.
On 11 April 2018 at 11:30, Hans de Groot <hansg at dandy.nl> wrote:
> Hello again :)
>
> Thank you all for your reply's. Below are the config files of the 3 hosts.
> I use tinc in router mode. I do not have a kernel mode config lines
> anywhere so tinc must be using the default settings here.
>
> I added the ipaddressx to subnets on hostc and this works. Traffic
2013 May 10
1
ARP resolution not done from one end
Folks,
We have a setup where each mobile node connects with 1 or more tinc instances (over different links) to a central node. tinc is running in switch mode. The link is chosen by setting the IP address on the active link's interface, and the central node sees this after the first packet on the link, and moves the MAC address to a different 'ethernet port' (link). This works really
2012 Dec 05
1
[Announcement] Version 1.1pre4 released
With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.1pre3. Here is a
summary of the changes:
* Added the "AutoConnect" option which will let tinc automatically select
which nodes to connect to.
* Improved performance of VLAN-tagged IP traffic inside the VPN.
* Ensured LocalDiscovery works with multiple BindToAddress statements and/or
IPv6-only LANs.
* Dropped dependency on
2012 Dec 05
1
[Announcement] Version 1.1pre4 released
With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.1pre3. Here is a
summary of the changes:
* Added the "AutoConnect" option which will let tinc automatically select
which nodes to connect to.
* Improved performance of VLAN-tagged IP traffic inside the VPN.
* Ensured LocalDiscovery works with multiple BindToAddress statements and/or
IPv6-only LANs.
* Dropped dependency on
2002 Aug 15
4
tinc-1.0pre7-i386-1.tgz
Beste tinc-developer,
Ik moet van mijn baas een aantal VPN's aanleggen en ben nu thuis bezig om te
testen. Ik heb 2 computers in een thuisnetwerkje (totaal 6 computers)
geinstalleerd met SuSe 7.3, daar de klanten dit ook hebben. De computers zijn
verbonden met een switch.
Dit is de inhoud van mijn bestanden:
Op computer 1 genaamd suse met ip 192.168.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0
2016 Feb 02
0
Multiple Tinc servers HA cross multiple regions
Hi,
I spend some time to investigate tinc to see how use it, Tinc is really
good.
I met some wired issue, maybe some guys can do me a favor.
In my case, there are 3 regions, and 2 servers in each region, total 6
servers.
each of servers will connect the servers in other regions, but no
connection to server in same region in configuration.
Region us-east
Region us-west
Region uk
tinc.conf like:
2010 Apr 14
1
ipv6 via tinc
Hi,
At my provider (xs4all) I've got an ipv6 tunnel working. Now I would
like to distribute ipv6 via the tinc tunnel.
My tinc.conf:
------------
Name=server
AddressFamily=ipv4
Device=/dev/net/tun
PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/fvhglobalnet/rsa_key.priv
GraphDumpFile=|/usr/bin/dot -Tpng -o /var/www/htdocs.keetweej.vanheusden.com/stats/tinc-fvh-network-graph.png
Mode=switch
KeyExpire=299
2002 Apr 25
1
Routing between two tunnels
Hi!
Me and two friends are trying to get a VPN working, but we cant get routing
between two tunnels.
This is how it looks, all servers (192.168.*.1) are running IP Masquerade to
enable the other computers behind them to access the internet.
Both elayne and glenn are connecting to melc, and the tunnel between melc
and glenn are running TCPOnly because that glenn doesnt have a public IP
(it's
2016 Dec 28
1
Performance issue with TunnelServer mode
Hi,
We have a tinc network of about ~200 hosts and in the full mesh
configuration we've had a lot of problems with the edge propagation storms
taking the entire network down. Recently we had a setup with a small number
of "hubs" to which all the other nodes connected to, which limited the
number of meta connections, but that didn't help much with the edge
propagation issues.
2016 May 03
2
Lots of Flushing x bytes to y would block messages
We run tinc in a linux environment in which it sits there waiting for
connections from the clients. All clients are configured to only have one
ConnectTo which points to this server.
We're seeing in the server log that as soon as a client's connection is
activated, a whole bunch of "Flushing x bytes to that host would block" is
logged and the whole vpn is bogged down and has