similar to: Is netname used in metadata connections ?

Greetings all, I've setup a new gretap device as per Herbert Xu's new patches and it works as expected for smaller MTU. I'm wondering if gretap tunnels handle fragmentation at all or if this might be a bridge related issue. The same setup works quite well if I use vtun with a tap device however, so while this isn't entirely bridge-related, Maybe someone here might have

First off, thanks to all who have made tinc possible and continue to work developing it. I hope perhaps in time I can become a useful part of this community. :) I'm having an interesting issue with tincctl and was hoping someone could shed some light on it. Everything seems to work correctly when I build for OSX; however on linux and windows builds, I always receive connection

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:02:24PM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > The self contained example is tricky because I created 4 ip-address on > the eth0 device (192.168.1.30/31/32/33) so I could test a 4 node VPN > that lives entirely within a single server. That's quite hard to do, it's far easier to run four instances of tinc on four different ports on the same machine. >

systemctl enable tincd at NETNAME systemctl: command not found Please help? Regards Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at hotmail.com> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > systemctl enable tincd at NETNAME for example > > -- > brgds > Max > On Feb 8, 2016 12:15 AM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: >

Hi all, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090722/30afa9ee/attachment.htm

http://bfy.tw/48zr -- brgds Max On Feb 8, 2016 7:39 AM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: Im running ubuntu 14.04. Regards Yazeed Fataar On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: systemctl enable tincd at NETNAME systemctl: command not found Please help? Regards Yazeed Fataar On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Maxim

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:25:28AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote: > But I have a question regarding "Subnet=" possibilities. When I have more than > one Server acting as host for VMs and need to have automatic routing to > all VMs on these servers, can I use tinc to create this routing automatically? > > My idea is to have a script which is started when a VM is

Hi, I have multiple ppp interfaces that does not correspond to the same network usage. Do you know anything about trying to set definitively the ppp+ name ? or anything to adapt automagically iptables to the real network which is behind each ppp+ interface ? I''ve tooken a look into the IFNAME env var... but it doesn''t seems to work :c/ regards, -- BeTa

I am hoping that someone with more experience and knowledge than I can assist me in finding a solution ;) We have a RedHat AS4 box with 5 interfaces. Two interfaces serve two different networks and two interfaces connect to two different uplinks. The fifth interface is our management interface. Since a picture is worth a thousand words I attempted to come up with a diagram:

Hi, Tinc experts I’m on-boarding for Tinc for just quite a few days, and trying to setup the connection between one client to multiple server, where multiple vpn tunnels from the client to different server. From the documentation, it indicate the tinc.conf can support multiple ConnecTo, also the tinc can support multiple netname, like /etc/tinc/net1, /etc/tinc/net2. My question is, for my above

greetings All, I have been reading over the Tinc manual and have become very interested in the "4.2 Multiple Networks" section of the manual. In particular, I am wondering if I read this correctly in that by using: `-n, --net=netname' Use configuration for net netname. then I can have multiple daemons running on the same machine. If I have 3 machines A, B, and C with A being

Options given on the command line have precedence over configuration from files. This can be useful, for example, for a roaming node, for which 'ConnectTo' and <host>.Address depends on its location. --- This patch is against stable branch. Merging this patch to the 1.1 branch is trivial. I use this patch on my Debian for several weeks. Here is the ifupdown script I use (some

Hi list ... I just observed a stange segfault: It seems tinc doesn't like my surname. # tincd -n Sattler -K Segmentation fault I tried several other netnames, there is no problem. The segfault only hap- pens with "Sattler" (capital "S"). I'm using tinc-1.0.22-r2 from Gentoo. Thomas

I think this is probably my first post to this mailing list, so hello! Occasionally I log in to my servers from IP addresses without reverse DNS configured, so sometimes I'll see an IP I don't recognise because I can't remember what I did the day before and get a bit spooked until I WHOIS the IP and find the netname reminds me I logged in from that IP. I set out prepared to script

I found a tincd crash caused by having two "Port" statements in a host's file. I realize this is a bug in an old version of tinc that may be fixed but I spent the past few hours tracking it down so I'm sharing it in hopes others can make use of this info. I was "cleaning" up my Tinc VPN of a collection of OpenWrt routers and tincd started crashing with "Got fatal

Hi, Etienne Thanks for your clarification, and this helped a lot. And in order to get a better understanding for the mechanism of Tinc and the purpose of ConnectTo statement, can I think the ConnectTo is the way to get the node into the Tinc VPN domain, instead of establish VPN connection between nodes. Once any node ConnectTo the Tinc VPN domain, it learns all other nodes, subnets, and

topology : two guest connected to physical LAN (vlan 620 and vlan 621) on host : 1) creating bridge br0 2) creating bridge for guest 1 and guest 2 - to separate traffic 3) virtual network1 : I have default NAT 192.168.122.x DHCP feeding IP to eth1 4) virtual network2 : I want to use 192.168.0.0 for eth0 my question is what would be my virtual network2 looks like : following is default xml :

Hi ! I want to setup tinc 1.0 pre4 with kernel 2.4.5 I didn't find information about settings of tun/tap device I did in kernel - [*] Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers Network device support <M> Universal TUN/TAP device driver support in /etc/modules.conf - alias char-major-10-200 tun mknod -m 600 /dev/tun c 10 200 chown 0.0 /dev/tun In mailing list archive I

Hi there, I would need some help with my configuration. I have tried a long time, but did not find my error. Thus I would really appreciate your help. There are three hosts: 1. h181 2. h182: Should ConnectTo h181 3. h183: Should ConnectTo h181 *Files under /etc/tinc/vpn0/hosts* [h181:] Address = 94.130.108.xxx Subnet = 172.16.1.1/32 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- *** -----END RSA PUBLIC

(Second try to send this. I wonder if the first one gotten eaten by a spam filter; I'll link to patches instead of attaching them.) Here are the tincctl patches I've been working on. They apply to http://www.tinc-vpn.org/svn/tinc/branches/1.1@1545. I intend to commit them once the crypto stuff's fixed. Since they're basically done, I'm emailing them now for review and in case