Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Spurious Interrupts on guest OS"
2002 Jul 22
2
rSync on RTOS
Hi All,
I need one information
How much effort is required to port the the rSync utility to
any of the RTOS available? (how much is the linux dependent
code in the implementattion?)
regards
Thanks in Advance
Biju
--
Biju Perumal
HCL Technologies Ltd. Voice +91-44-3728366 (Xtn-1134)
http://san.hcltech.com
2019 Jun 27
2
LLVM on bare-metal
Hi Tim.
Thank you for taking to time to comment on the background!
I will definitely study lldb and remote JIT for ideas. I worry that I
will not be able to pre-link on the host side because the host cannot(?)
know the final memory layout of code on the client side, especially when
there are multiple plugins being loaded in different combinations on the
host and client. Is that an
2007 May 21
2
Using Dropbear for RTOS which is not POSIX complaint?
Hi,
We have a proprietary RTOS which is *not* POSIX complaint. We want to port
SSH server and SCP client onto our platform. How difficult it would be, to
port Dropbear into our platform? We would like to integrate our CLI with the
SSH.
Any recommendations on using Dropbear for our platform? Appreciate sharing
your experiences with Dropbear.
---
Thanks,
Mohan
2017 May 11
0
Playing FLAC Files on Audi MMI
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:45 AM, elio manes <elioarmando at optonline.net>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am hoping that perhaps you know the answer to my car audio question, or
> can at least point me in the right direction. I own a 2013 Audi S4 that
> has the 3G-Plus Multi Media Interface (MMI) with the Bang & Olufsen Sound
> System.
>
>
> The MMI is able to
2019 Jun 27
2
LLVM on bare-metal
Would you say that embedding the LLVM linker is a practical way to get
the required dynamic linking capabilities on the bare-metal side?
Orthogonal Devices
Tokyo, Japan
www.orthogonaldevices.com
On 27/06/2019 19:06, Peter Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 10:36, Brian Clarkson via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Hi Tim.
>>
>> Thank you for
2006 Jul 20
1
[RTLWS8-CFP] Eighth Real-Time Linux Workshop 2nd CFP
We apologize for multiple receipts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eighth Real-Time Linux Workshop
October 12-15, 2006
Lanzhou University - SISE
Tianshui South Road 222
Lanzhou, Gansu 730000
2019 Jun 27
2
LLVM on bare-metal
Hi Peter
Thank you for your helpful comments, especially on the RPI. Since my
use case is lot simpler than compiling all of Clang, I hopefully can
take your experience as a good sign.
The RTOS that TI provides for the AM335x actually has pretty complete
posix layer and other standard libraries. However, I am working without
any virtual memory subsystem, so no mmap. However, I was under
2013 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
I've been chasing down a bug for a few days in some RTOS code I'm building with clang. In the end it comes down to this code:
void external(void);
void test(char *x)
{
x--;
if (!x)
{
external();
}
}
When compiled for ARM with TOT clang (r183249) at -O1 or greater, no calls to 'external()' appear in the output code at all. I have an example
2007 Jul 30
1
QEMU 0.9.0 packages available for Solaris 8 (-SDL, use vnc), 9&10 (+SDL)
All,
I''ve posted some QEMU 0.9.0 packages for x86_64 and SPARC on my website at
http://www.thoughtwave.net/downloads.html
Some of these include libSDL support compiled in (The Solaris 10+ version),
but I did not have libSDL available on my Solaris 9 machine.
Some include MTOOLS 3.9.10 which is invaluable for building floppy disk
images for RTOS development.
The packages install in
2013 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
If this were a problem with an omitted statement involving a normal
variable, I'd guess you're missing a volatile qualifier. I'm not 100% sure
volatile is a valid qualifier for functions, but try it.
If RTOS stands for real time OS, then reading up on volatile would be a
really good idea.
P.S. Sorry Carl, you're going to receive this twice. I forget to CC the
list.
--------------
2002 Apr 18
1
xxx_kex possible memory leak?
Howdy,
I'm working on porting the portable version of OpenSSH to the Nucleus RTOS.
So far I've had a great deal of success. However, I've run into a possible
memory leak, and I'm not sure whether I need to write my own cleanup
function for it or not. The xxx_kex global (defined in sshd.c) seems to not
get freed. I've had difficulty finding a cleanup routine for it. I've
2000 Aug 17
1
Compiling Samba for LynxOS?
When I attempted to build Samba (v2.0.7) on a LynxOS (v3.1) box I was
told that configure could determine my operating system.
LynxOS, for those that don't know, is a Unix-like RTOS. It comes with
a binary version of Samba, but a) it's old and b) it's not built for
encrypted passwords which means I can't access it from WinNT.
Can anyone advise me on what it would take to build
2013 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Tyler Hardin <tghardin1 at catamount.wcu.edu> wrote:
> If this were a problem with an omitted statement involving a normal variable, I'd guess you're missing a volatile qualifier. I'm not 100% sure volatile is a valid qualifier for functions, but try it.
Well, yes, if I change the signature to:
void test(char * volatile x)
It works, but
2002 Aug 05
1
Problems compiling on QNX
Hi All,
Im a newbie here, and im sorry if im repeating the question.
Im trying to compile samba 2.2.5 on QNX RTOS 6.2.0 x86pc. I am getting the following error.
Compiling printing/print_generic.c
Compiling printing/lpq_parse.c
Compiling printing/load.c
Compiling profile/profile.c
profile/profile.c: In function `profile_setup':
profile/profile.c:93: storage size of `shm_ds' isn't
2002 Sep 05
1
EXT3 Corruption Question
Greetings Everyone,
A group in my office is designing/integrating what I would loosly label as an "embedded system". In that, it performs a dedicated task and is not a general purpose workstation or server. It operates in a harsh environment, particularly a questionable power environment and they are extremely concerned about inadvertent shutdown and recovery. They were totally
2006 Jul 17
3
mini-os under xen 3.0.2
Hello all,
I have successfully installed xen 3.0.2 on a dual celeron system. Linux in
dom0 works fine. Now, I would like to play with the mini-os (my ultimate goal
is to implement a small RTOS as guest in Xen, so mini-os looks like an ideal
starting point). However, I can''t seem to get it to run as (I think) it
should: It boots up, but as far as I understand the source code and the
2008 Feb 22
1
Patch for Analog Devices compiler & fixed-point AGC
Robin Getz a ?crit :
>> As I told you, bank is a reserved keyword in Analog Devices compiler for
>> Blackfin architecture.
>
> This seems lame, and maybe you need to change the header files inside VDSP++.
> (This is pretty common for VDSP users to do when name space clashes occur
> with open source software).
>
> Poking at the VDSP docs, says that it uses bank()
2017 May 10
2
Playing FLAC Files on Audi MMI
Hello,
I am hoping that perhaps you know the answer to my car audio question,
or can at least point me in the right direction. I own a 2013 Audi S4
that has the 3G-Plus Multi Media Interface (MMI) with the Bang & Olufsen
Sound System.
The MMI is able to playback lossy, compressed audio files (MP3, WMA and
AAC), but does not have native support for FLAC, ALAC, or WMA Lossless.
2016 Jan 04
1
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:41:28PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +#define fence() metag_fence()
> > +#else
> > +#define fence() do { } while (0)
> > #endif
>
> James, it strikes me as odd that fence() is a no-op instead of a
> barrier() for UP, can
2019 Jun 27
4
LLVM on bare-metal
Hello!
Q1
Are there any resources or examples on embedding LLVM into an ARM-based
bare-metal application? Searching in this area only turns up
information on how to use LLVM to target bare-metal when I want to
compile LLVM for linking against a bare-metal application.
Q2
Are there any memory usage benchmarks for LLVM across the common tasks
(especially loading bytecode, doing the