similar to: WebRTC meeting Norfolk, 15 October 2014

I've now prepared a blog about my experience setting up Asterisk 11 with repro as a SIP proxy for WebSocket clients: http://danielpocock.com/using-resiprocate-to-connect-asterisk-webrtc In particular, the focus is on the use of packages because that makes it faster for more people to deploy identical working systems. To get the demo running for the WebSocket client, I really only needed

Hello Opus community, I'd like to ask you for advice and recommendations. WebRTC uses Opus, and I noticed https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/5549004 started referring to currently internal Opus headers. This is possible because for Chromium the Opus sources are just checked in, so any header can be #included. I detected this when trying to package Chromium for Linux distributions with

I've created a blog entry about my XCP on Debian wheezy experiences http://danielpocock.com/migrating-to-xen-cloud-platform-on-debian-wheezy Please let me know if anything is inaccurate or could be explained better. I'm quite happy to add links out to other resources that are up to date.

I honestly couldn't tell you if it would resolve it but there aren't many people going to be willing to help problem solve anything if you're running 13 - you'll get more support on 17 for example. Very easy to bring up a new instance or VM in the grand scheme of things to test the theory and get it working on most recent version of Asterisk On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:37 AM

Hi, I've run into a slight issue when using WebRTC and two Asterisk boxes. I am using SIPml as the test WebRTC client. My two asterisk boxes, one of them is configured for WebRTC with websockets, etc (asteriskrtc.local) and the other is just a standard asterisk server (asteriskgary.local). Dealing with just the WebRTC asterisk server, asteriskrtc.local, I am able to log in to the SIPml

Toufic Khreish (Gmail) wrote: > Hello, > > Webrtc stopped after upgrading firefox from version 36 to version37. > I have been running webrtc with freepbx 12 and asterisk 13.2 or 13.3 and > firefox version 36 without any issues until firefox was upgraded to version > 37. > Unfortunately Chrome works well in one direction (from chrome to any > extension) but calling from an

First things first, upgrade from 13 - WebRTC has moved a long a lot since then. If you can't upgrade everything to 13 then run another asterisk specifically for WebRTC and bridge to your other Asterisk Is this just an audio conference? On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:21 PM Teijo <g.aloitus at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > Has somebody get combination Asterisk (I'm

Hello, Webrtc stopped after upgrading firefox from version 36 to version37. I have been running webrtc with freepbx 12 and asterisk 13.2 or 13.3 and firefox version 36 without any issues until firefox was upgraded to version 37. Unfortunately Chrome works well in one direction (from chrome to any extension) but calling from an extension to a webrtc on chrome has one way voice. Could someone try

Thank you much for yor reply. 2016-02-18 13:30 GMT+01:00 Simon Hohberg <simon.hohberg at mcs-datalabs.com>: > Hi Oliver, > > On 02/18/2016 12:10 PM, Olivier wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to have my first calls with WebRTC. > My server has asterisk 13.7.0. > > I'm following the instructions from the wiki [1]. > So I'm using [2] live demo from

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:40 AM Carlos Chavez <cursor at telecomab.mx> wrote: > > On 9/26/2018 4:46 AM, Olivier wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative > > to softphone deployment. > > > > For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for > > installation and

Hi, I spent the past week experimenting with webrtc + asterisk 11.9.0-rc1 + opus/vb8 codec patch. This is interesting technology and I try to find out how to connect all the moving parts. Firefox: Neither sipml5 or jssip works with calls to asterisk, audio/video doesn't matter. WARNING[977][C-00000005] chan_sip.c: Rejecting secure audio stream without encryption details: audio 35684

Hello, Currently audio conference. Should upgrading Asterisk from 13 to newer version resolve webrtc/iOS problem? Best regards, Teijo Dan Jenkins kirjoitti 28.4.2020 klo 12.18: > First things first, upgrade from 13 - WebRTC has moved a long a lot since > then. If you can't upgrade everything to 13 then run another asterisk > specifically for WebRTC and bridge to your other

For the client: JSSIP and Sipml5. If you are going to be coding something up yourself I like the JSSIP 0.5.x javascript interfaces. If you are simply going to use a pre-canned one then sipml5 works pretty well and remembers your settings in localstorage. I haven't used any closed source versions since the above works really well for us. For the server: If you are using Asterisk 1.8

The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain web browser specially VP8 codecs so a friend of mine

The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain web browser specially VP8 codecs so a friend of mine

Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain

Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain

Dear All, I use sipml5 to register two users from browser and the two clients are successfully connected. But when I made a call from one of the users, the other user doen'st have call notification and for a while the calling process ended. I check the /var/log/asterisk/messages got the following log: [Dec 17 14:54:11] WARNING[11471][C-00000000] chan_sip.c: Received SAVPF profle in audio

Hello, This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative to softphone deployment. For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for installation and configuration. Also, Softphones must be carefully choosen if Deskphone-like quality is expected. Now that WebRTC becomes ubiquitous, it might make sense to trade Softphone features (call history, BLF, ...) for

I'm having the same issue! The difference in my case is Asterisk server has a public IPv4 and the browser is behind a single NAT. I'm forwarding my configuration below (which I posted previously on asterisk-users). How can we debug ICE negotiation? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Vinicius Fontes <vinicius at aittelecom.com.br> Date: 2015-07-27 13:54 GMT-03:00