similar to: bash - safely pass untrusted strings?

if i would save the content of a textarea into mysql i eventually have to mask things like ,"/\ and so on. in php there are the add- and stripslashes functions you could use. is there somthing compareable like this in the string object of prototype? if not, it would very nice to have, i think. function addslashes(str) { str=str.replace(/\''/g,''\\\'''');

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:14:07AM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > ssh server.example.com /usr/bin/do/something > r=$? > if [ $r -eq 0 ] ; then > echo success > elif [ $r -eq 255 ] ; then > echo ssh failed > else > echo command failed > fi ssh remoteserver exit 255 Hmm :-) exit(-1) aka exit(255) is a pretty standard "generic failure code" for many

hi: at RHEL 7.4 we had used "map untrusted to domain = yes". so users can login with "username" instead of "sam-dom\username". after upgrade to RHEL 7.5, samba version upgrade from 4.6 to 4.7. now "map untrusted to domain = yes" or "map untrusted to domain = auto" are not working. can we still let user to use "usename" instead

Hey there, I have a FCKeditor(a WYSIWYG online html editor) and i want to bring it to a page by Ajax and JSON by a php request-catcher. I have sth like this in my ajax request: new Ajax.Request(''myactions.php'', { method:''get'', parameters: {action:''bringeditor'', id:<?php echo $uid; ?>}, onSuccess: function(transport){

Hi I have a question/problem about winbind and the "map untrusted to domain" (=yes) parameter. I use samba 3.6.0 on FreeBSD 8.2 with the following configuration: [global] encrypt passwords = yes map untrusted to domain = yes allow trusted domains = yes client ntlmv2 auth = yes client use spnego = yes client lanman auth = yes client plaintext auth = no winbind enum

For awhile, at least a week and probably more, aptitude has been complaining that R packages are untrusted. I'm using the amd64 architecture. The packages are r-cran-{cluster,mass,zoo,matrix,digest}. There have been a couple of recent threads that seem related, but I'm having trouble interpreting them or their relevance. i386 is apparently unsigned, but I'm on amd64. There is some

2018-06-29 15:12 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:56:33 +0800 > d tbsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> hi: >> >> at RHEL 7.4 we had used "map untrusted to domain = yes". so users >> can login with "username" instead of "sam-dom\username". >>

Hello, I just upgraded Samba on a fileserver from 4.6.8 to 4.7.0; this fileserver is joined to a Samba4 AD Domain. I have configured the following options to allow guest access to a share: [global] guest account = nobody map to guest = Bad User [Share] guest ok = yes When attempting to connect from a local account on a Windows 7 client (the client is joined to the domain but the

----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:54:17 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Cannot authenticate as guest to domain-joined Samba 4.7.0 fileserver when map untrusted to domain = > auto > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:47:57 -0500 (CDT) > Andrew Martin

I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are "untrusted". With some general websearching reveals that this is a *GNome3* so-called "security" issue (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f5348). I found a thread on the CentOS Forums (I don't have an account

----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:29:59 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Cannot authenticate as guest to domain-joined Samba 4.7.0 fileserver when map untrusted to domain = > auto > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:53:41 -0500 (CDT) > Andrew Martin

How can I get ssh to use "untrusted" cookies (see xauth(1), X11-SECURITY-Extension) with forwarded X clients? Cheers. Aurelio.

Hello everyone, Samba 3.6.9 on CentOS 6.4. With "security = ads", winbind doesn't authenticate requests that prepend a not-existent domain to the username. Users that have logged into the domain authenticate transparently to squid with NTLM (format is domain\username), but not users that are logged in locally or into another domain with the same username and password (format is

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Whose responsibility is it supposed to be to check types for legality? > The BCReader? Or perhaps the verifier? It's pretty easy to resolve using the rule "assertions should never trigger": if the bitcode reader triggers an assertion, it's a bug in the bitcode reader. -Eli

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-03-31 05:13 ------- we should perhaps vis(3) wrap log calls. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Suppose I had a program that would receive bitcode and do something with it other than run it, and for performance I this program is built Release-Asserts. Currently, illegal types are caught by the AsmParser and again by some assertions in Type.cpp. However, a .bc file could contain an illegal type like [5 x void] and without assertions enabled, this actually gets created in the IR. Also,

At Sun, 28 Apr 2019 18:53:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 12:11 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop > > machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are > >

We have a windows domain "AD" and a samba domain "SAD" running Samba 4.9 in AD-mode. We also have an old NT4 domain called "Samba" running Samba 3.6 + OpenLDAP. We have the same users and passwords in all three. The user objects in the "SAD"-domain have the same uidNumber as in the "Samba"-domain. Workstations and users log on to the windows

For some weeks I've been trying to devise a way to connect multiple users in various parts of the city and state, and I found out that most likely Tinc is the only daemon that does the kind of meshing I want. I was successful in connecting some servers of mine around in switch mode, but now comes the hard part: How can I authenticate clients on my network? I would also need to direct static

In the changelog, there is an entry: 20001129 - (djm) Back out all the serverloop.c hacks. sshd will now hang again if there are background children with open fds. Does this mean that this is regarded as expected (and correct) behavior, that should not change in the future, or does it mean that this behavior is a known problem that someone will eventually fix? --Adam -- Adam McKenna