similar to: Realtime integration: Unregistered clients showing as registered?

Greetings, I've noticed a problem that might originate from my Asterisk configuration, could use a hand in sorting it out. Problem is a 488 response from Asterisk whenever it gets RTP/SAVPF profile in the SDP. My current setup has Asterisk Kamailio realtime integration, and Kamailio uses dispatcher to route calls for Asterisk to handle. Now I have only one Asterisk, on the same machine as

Hello, I'm trying to get calls working between websocket clients and sip clients. For clients I have sip.js based clients on chrome, Zoipers and a Grandstream phone. Challenge here is I'd like to have Kamailio and rtpengine to handle the bridging between different rtp profiles but Asterisk changes them in the sdp bodies along the way. I'm using Asterisk 11.11.0. Is there a way to

Hello, I'd appreciate your comments on the following problem I'm having, please forgive me if this is something obvious, I've been scratching my head on this for a while: I have Asterisk+Kamailio setup where I'm currently testing inbound calls from outside. I have both webrtc and sip clients, where webrtc peers are defined according to sip.js instructions (

Hello, I noticed a strange thing while testing my Asterisk-Kamailio Realtime setup. In an INVITE the From and To headers contain the same number when calling through a Realtime integration setup. This happens when the INVITE leaves Asterisk. Can you guys tell me what might be causing this? I have 660 at testers.com as a websocket client and 700 at testers.com (caller) using a Zoiper client (db

Hello, I have a problem with a call between 2 webrtc clients. Asterisk removes the ice-related lines from the sdp when it sends the INVITE out, and the called webrtc client rejects the INVITE due to the missing ice lines. Both webrtc clients are defined exactly the same way, same values in all fields except the number of the peer. There's probably something I've changed that causes this

Hello all, I have an Asterisk installation with Kamailio using realtime integration. I have gotten my clients to register, but there is something odd about the sip message flow with some of my clients. My clients are Zoiper and Asterisk is 11.10.2. When I set 'Subscribe to MWI' value to 'both', after a normal, successful registration Asterisk begins to send REGISTER messages to

I am currently preparing a kamailio-asterisk combination. The asterisk installation uses realtime for SIP. The kamailio configuration was based on the reference at http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb but has been heavily modified. Currently asterisk runs on localhost and only listens on SIP/RTP at 127.0.0.1 . Therefore, all of the SIP traffic appears to

Hello, Got a question regarding custom announcements in Asterisk. My goal is to allow my users record their own queue announcements and choose which announcements they want to use in each queue. I have several Asterisk servers and a Kamailio server which dispatches call traffic between the Asterisks. Question is, is it possible to have something like a NSF disk shared between several asterisk

For those that were interested I have attached the kamailio.cfg which we have working with Kamailio 4.2.1 and Asterisk 1.8.23/32. Specifically, the following yum packages: kamailio.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms kamailio-auth-ephemeral.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms kamailio-bdb.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms

Hello all, Just wondering on a behavior I noticed while testing with realtime sip peers with names like 111.222 at mydomain.com. Using Kamailio as outbound proxy, it sends Asterisk a sip message where To header value is < sip:111.222 at mydomain.com> and From header has value "username" < sip:111.333 at mydomain.com;transport=UDP>;tag=fc609171. When Asterisk sends out the

Hi, I want to have Kamailio in front of one or more Asterisk boxes. I don't think it is necessary for Kamailio and Asterisk to register with one another. I'd like for PJSIP to recognise Kamailio by its IP address. I have two boxes, both have public IP addresses, they also have private IP addresses and can communicate with each other. I have a Snom phone accessing Kamailio via its

Works for me.... Thanks, Hristo Benev -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alexandru Oniciuc Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:29 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] R: new way of asterisk and kamailio(openser) realtime integration

I have a setup with asterisk-11.7.0 and kamailio-4.1.1. I am following the setup guide at http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb . I want to run asterisk and kamailio on the same server, with SIP realtime configuration (MySQL database) so that kamailio authenticates and then forwards the registration to asterisk on localhost. The setup calls for asterisk to be

Hello, I put together a new tutorial about asterisk realtime integration with kamailio (openser). This time the database used is the one of asterisk, also call routing logic is controlled by asterisk, here is the link: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.0.x-asterisk-1.6.2-astdb Practically is an easier way to scale starting from existing asterisk installations. The other

Hi all, I saw Matt Jordan's recent Kamailio world talk and was interested in the idea he proposed of stripping out authentication and registration from asterisk and letting Kamailio handle it. All of the tutorials I've seen (e.g. on asipto) show Kamailio forwarding registrations to asterisk. In order to do what Matt suggested would I be correct in assuming I would have to use the

Hi all Have recently watched Matt Jordan's session on Kamailio World 2014 On slides 26-29 of his presentation (http://www.kamailio.org/events/2014-KamailioWorld/day1/09-Matt.Jordan-Asterisk12-And-PJSIP.pdf) he speaks about a (completely new, for me at least) approach to build scalable telephony systems, using N instances of Kamailio and N instances of Asterisk Are there any

Hello Im using Asterisk as a SIP client of Kamailio with RTPproxy. Asterisk is behind NAT. X-Lite and SNOM phones behind NAT work fine. But when I try to connect with an Asterisk behind NAT, the Asterisk client doesn't receive sound. I already tried in 2 different NATs, with no firewalls. This is my Asterisk config: [kamailio] type=peer host=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx disallow=all allow=ulaw

Hi, We have a Kamailio and Asterisk cluster, both machines being on a real 103.x IP address and also on a 172.x OpenVPN address. The problem is that when Kamailo receives a call from the VPN and forwards it to the Asterisk server on it's 103.x address, Asterisk never sees the call. If Kamailio receives a call from the VPN and forwards the call to the Asterisk server on it's 172.x

Hi, We have some Asterisk servers that we are moving behind a NAT to preserve public addresses and make room for growth. This is Asterisk 1.4 NAT works very good with the externip/localnet-setting when we are connected directly to our teleco. But when I try to use NAT and put them behind our Kamailio something interesting happens: The media-address in the SDP is the internal ip and not the

OK, it stopped working. It turns out the transport and endpoints in PJSIP are ok. I can send an invite from my unregistered snom phone and I can see some activity in the CLI. However, when I dial from my snom to Kamailio and have it pass the message to asterisk, PJSIP seems to ignore the sip messages even though they are there. Is there something wrong in the invite that I'm missing? U