similar to: JABBER_STATUS issue

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "JABBER_STATUS issue"

2014 Oct 01
1
JABBER_STATUS CODE 7
Hi all,I hope to find a solution with the help of the list, I'm trying to get the status of my extensions with ejabberd , the idea is to visualize my users ejabberd incoming calls or missed. I'm testing with my operator extension with this code but only get the missed call notification does not show me where the call is coming. my piece of code [operadora] exten =>
2004 Oct 06
1
Asterisk to BabyTel VoIP SIP Provider
Hi, Does anyone has configured Asterisk to connect to BabyTel (a SIP Provider in Canada) ? Here is my sip.conf (I'm behind a firewall and I already opened port 5060 and 5065 (udp and tcp) to my Asterisk server): [general] port = 5065 context = Test insecure = very register => 1514XXXXXXX:password@sip.babytel.ca When starting Asterisk, the sip registration failed after 5 connecting
2017 Dec 03
2
PJSIP OPTIONS
If understand correctly type=identify is more for sip trunk configuration ? ;[mytrunk] ;type=identify ;endpoint=mytrunk ;match=198.51.100.1 ;match=198.51.100.2 In chan_sip it was just reply 200 OK on keepalive packet without need define trunks. volga629 On Sun, 3 Dec, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017, at 10:42 AM, volga629 at
2017 Dec 14
2
PJSIP OPTIONS
Hello Joshua, What will be example of endpoint configuration that not require authentication from specific ip ? volga629 On Sun, 3 Dec, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017, at 10:55 AM, volga629 at networklab.ca wrote: >> If understand correctly type=identify is more for sip trunk >> configuration ? >> >>
2017 Dec 03
2
PJSIP OPTIONS
Right now it reply 401 Unauthorized with message in log "No matching endpoint ..." on Content 0 should reply 200 OK I guess <--- Received SIP request (376 bytes) from UDP:10.30.100.41:5060 ---> OPTIONS sip:10.30.100.27:5080 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.100.41;branch=z9hG4bKf5eb.1ac76487000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:10.30.100.27:5080> From: <sip:vprx00 at
2015 Feb 16
1
SIP show peers: UNREACHABLE
I'm trying to configure SIP trunking. Now, I'm referencing "Asterisk the definitive guide", 4th ed. While I don't have the page handy, I was reading the suggestion to try SIP to SIP before proceeding to outside connectivity. I'm aware that SIP trunking is a construct, but am, obviously, learning the system. What I'd like to do is from the CLI "ping"
2015 Mar 20
0
UNREACHABLE peer
Turn on sip debugging for this peer and watch for the options sending and response. If you are getting a response to your options asterisk shouldn't be marking the peer as unavailable. is your asterisk behind a firewall? On 20 March 2015 at 13:42, thufir <hawat.thufir at gmail.com> wrote: > I wasn't able to get much out of babytel, beyond the fact that I was, > apparently,
2015 Mar 20
4
UNREACHABLE peer
I wasn't able to get much out of babytel, beyond the fact that I was, apparently, sending options which is why I'm not getting 200 OK. How can I, generally speaking, ping/telnet or otherwise test the connection to get more data? A connection to this peer directly from a softphone, Jitsi, works fine. linux-k7qk*CLI> linux-k7qk*CLI> sip show peer testcarrier * Name :
2017 Dec 03
2
PJSIP OPTIONS
Hello Everyone, How to configure PJSIP to reply 200 OK from upstream sip proxy on keepalive packet ? proxy ~> Keepalive OPTIONS ~> asterisk <~ 200 OK <~ volga629 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171203/8b9bc701/attachment.html>
2015 Feb 16
0
LAN sip-to-sip
It looks as if that is more of a question/issue with your router, rather than Asterisk. I have SIP devices working on my LAN, all hardwired, and have no need to open any ports or have the router address SIP in any way My switch is not managed, and the router ports on the LAN side are all unmanaged, just a huge Ethernet "wirenut" You SHOULD be able to communicate between devices on the
2015 Feb 16
3
LAN sip-to-sip
I'm reading the O'Reilly "Asterisk the definitive guide", 4th ed, with a starfish on it. In some ways, astonishing that it's not really that definitive, it's more general -- and it only clocks in at one ream of paper! In any event, I'm having some port problems on my home network: http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/81752/ I need to open ports for
2015 Mar 23
0
trying to connect to asterisk with softphone (logs, etc)
In the Asterisk log I see: --- [Mar 23 19:25:29] VERBOSE[4067] chan_sip.c: [Mar 23 19:25:29] <--- SIP read from UDP:198.38.7.34:5065 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK To: <sip:16046289850 at sip.babytel.ca>;tag=sd3D4swKRc From: <sip:16046289850 at sip.babytel.ca>;tag=as07c833c5 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 96.48.217.39:5060;branch=z9hG4bK13c68eb7;rport Call-ID:
2015 Apr 09
0
dial out with channel variable; sub-string usage
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:10:30 -0700 thufir <hawat.thufir at gmail.com> wrote: > I want to do something like: > > > exten => _NXXXNxxxxxx,1,Dial(${BABY}/${EXTEN}) > exten => _Nxxxxxx,1,Dial(${BABY}/${EXTEN}) > exten => _1NXXNxxxxxx,1,Dial(${BABY}/${EXTEN}) > exten => _011.,1,Dial(Dial({TOLL}/${EXTEN}) > exten => _9NXXXNxxxxxx,1,Dial(${BABY}/${EXTEN})
2013 Nov 22
1
Res corosync.
Hello Everyone, I setup res corosync for distributed events and constantly see this message. [2013-11-22 15:26:37] WARNING[3147]: res_corosync.c:316 ast_event_cb: CPG mcast failed (6) [2013-11-22 15:26:37] WARNING[3147]: res_corosync.c:316 ast_event_cb: CPG mcast failed (6) Any information will be helpful. Slava. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2009 Nov 27
1
Asterisk 1.6.2.0-rc6 + Teliax = First Part Of Audio File Playback Cut Off
Good evening all, hope everyone in the US had a nice Thanksgiving! On one of our internal servers, I decided to make the leap from 1.4.2x to 1.6.2.0-rc6 so I could start learning about the changes and new features that have been implemented. I upgraded all the configs, removed all the deprecated stuff, etc -- well went well. However, I noticed after the upgrade, when dialing into an
2012 Sep 14
1
Issues with routing IPv6 to KVM Guests
Hi People, I have some issues with routing ipv6 to my kvm guests. I use a bridge interface with bridge-utils like recommended in the most howtos. Bridge conf: http://fpaste.org/hh9U/ ip -6 route show output: http://fpaste.org/c5Rd/ sysctl.conf: http://fpaste.org/oMjD/ Thanks for your help in advance. If you need more informations just let me know. David Hackl
2005 Jan 18
0
Canadian Content: Telus and Shaw...
>I called Telus before Christmas requesting some sort of VOIP connection. >We are going with babytel. I'll advise how that works when it is up and >running, hopefully next week. [plug] www.thinktel.ca I know the guys they are competent they will sell IAX. Peered thru GT in Downtown Edmonton.
2015 Feb 19
0
sipsak: 404 error
Hi, I **think** that I have user of thufir101, because I get a 200 response below, but I also get a 404. It seems to depend on how I send the ip address/fqdn? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201 password 201 default No Yes
2015 Feb 20
0
sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?
On 2/20/15 6:15 AM, thufir wrote: > What's the difference between user "123" and "devries"? Based on the > output here, they seem the same..? > > tleilax*CLI> > tleilax*CLI> sip show users > Username Secret Accountcode > Def.Context ACL Forcerport > 201 password 201 > default
2015 Feb 20
2
sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?
What's the difference between user "123" and "devries"? Based on the output here, they seem the same..? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201 password 201 default No Yes 123